Association between anxious depression and clinical outcomes in subjects with treatment-resistant depression: a comparative effectiveness research trial for antidepressant incomplete and non-responders with treatment-resistant depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Stefania Chaikali, Clotilde Guidetti, Silvia Ioannou, Madhukar H Trivedi, Richard C Shelton, Dan V Iosifescu, Michael E Thase, Manish K Jha, Sanjay J Mathew, Charles DeBattista, Mehmet E Dokucu, Olga Brawman-Mintzer, Glenn W Currier, William Vaughn McCall, Matthew Macaluso, Alexander Bystritsky, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Erik B Nelson, Albert S Yeung, Leslie C MacGregor, Thomas Carmody, Maurizio Fava, George I Papakostas
{"title":"Association between anxious depression and clinical outcomes in subjects with treatment-resistant depression: a comparative effectiveness research trial for antidepressant incomplete and non-responders with treatment-resistant depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD).","authors":"Stefania Chaikali, Clotilde Guidetti, Silvia Ioannou, Madhukar H Trivedi, Richard C Shelton, Dan V Iosifescu, Michael E Thase, Manish K Jha, Sanjay J Mathew, Charles DeBattista, Mehmet E Dokucu, Olga Brawman-Mintzer, Glenn W Currier, William Vaughn McCall, Matthew Macaluso, Alexander Bystritsky, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Erik B Nelson, Albert S Yeung, Leslie C MacGregor, Thomas Carmody, Maurizio Fava, George I Papakostas","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anxious depression is a negative prognostic factor linked to worse outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, its role in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains unclear. This secondary analysis of the ASCERTAIN-TRD trial investigates the role of anxious depression as a predictor or moderator of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety and Somatization Subscale score of at least 7 identified subjects with the anxious depressive subtype. Treatment response was evaluated based on changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores using mixed-effects models with repeated measures and included additional terms accounting for the presence or absence of anxious depression. Two hundred fifty-three patients, who had at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score were included in the analysis. Of them, 182 subjects presented anxious and 71 nonanxious depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment outcomes were similar across the three treatment groups regardless of anxious MDD status ( P -value > 0.5 for all comparisons) suggesting that anxious depression was not a significant predictor or moderator of treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that anxious depression alone may be prognostic rather than predictive. These findings may be a useful guidance for clinicians, suggesting that standard TRD treatments remain applicable in the anxious MDD subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anxious depression is a negative prognostic factor linked to worse outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, its role in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains unclear. This secondary analysis of the ASCERTAIN-TRD trial investigates the role of anxious depression as a predictor or moderator of treatment response.

Methods: A Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety and Somatization Subscale score of at least 7 identified subjects with the anxious depressive subtype. Treatment response was evaluated based on changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores using mixed-effects models with repeated measures and included additional terms accounting for the presence or absence of anxious depression. Two hundred fifty-three patients, who had at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score were included in the analysis. Of them, 182 subjects presented anxious and 71 nonanxious depression.

Results: Treatment outcomes were similar across the three treatment groups regardless of anxious MDD status ( P -value > 0.5 for all comparisons) suggesting that anxious depression was not a significant predictor or moderator of treatment outcome.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that anxious depression alone may be prognostic rather than predictive. These findings may be a useful guidance for clinicians, suggesting that standard TRD treatments remain applicable in the anxious MDD subtype.

难治性抑郁症患者焦虑性抑郁与临床结局之间的关系:一项针对难治性抑郁症患者抗抑郁药不完全和无反应的比较有效性研究试验(查明- trd)。
目的:焦虑性抑郁是与重度抑郁障碍(MDD)预后不良相关的负面预后因素。然而,其在难治性抑郁症(TRD)中的作用尚不清楚。这是对确定- trd试验的二次分析,研究焦虑抑郁作为治疗反应的预测因子或调节因子的作用。方法:采用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表焦虑和躯体化量表对至少7名焦虑抑郁亚型被试进行评分。治疗效果的评估基于蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表得分的变化,使用重复测量的混合效应模型,并包括考虑焦虑性抑郁存在或不存在的附加条款。253名患者至少有一个基线后蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表得分被纳入分析。其中182人表现为焦虑性抑郁,71人表现为非焦虑性抑郁。结果:无论焦虑性重度抑郁症状态如何,三个治疗组的治疗结果相似(所有比较的p值为>.5),这表明焦虑性抑郁不是治疗结果的显著预测因子或调节因子。结论:这些发现表明焦虑性抑郁本身可能是预后因素,而不是预测因素。这些发现可能为临床医生提供有用的指导,表明标准的TRD治疗仍然适用于焦虑型重度抑郁症亚型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书