Fate of key food-borne pathogens associated with intensive pig and poultry farming environments

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
H.N. Chinivasagam
{"title":"Fate of key food-borne pathogens associated with intensive pig and poultry farming environments","authors":"H.N. Chinivasagam","doi":"10.25913/5ea65d87d8474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive pig and poultry farming in Australia can be a source of pathogens with implications for food-safety and/or human illness. Seven studies were undertaken with the following objectives:  Assess the types of zoonotic pathogens in waste  Assess the transfer of pathogens during re-use both within the shed and externally in the environment  The potential for movement of pathogens via aerosols In the first and second studies the extent of zoonotic pathogens was evaluated in both piggery effluent and chicken litter and Salmonella and Campylobacter were detected in both wastes. In the third study the dynamics of Salmonella during litter re-use was examined and results showed a trend for lower Salmonella levels and serovar diversity in re-used litter compared to new litter. Thus, re-use within the poultry farming system posed no increased risk. The fourth study addressed the direct risks of pathogens to farm workers due to reuse of piggery effluent within the pig shed. Based on air-borne Escherichia coli (E. coli) levels, re-using effluent did not pose a risk. In the fifth study high levels of Arcobacter spp. were detected in effluent ponds and freshly irrigated soils with potential food-safety risks during the irrigation of food-crops and pasture. The sixth and seventh studies addressed the risks from aerosols from mechanically ventilated sheds. Staphylococci were shown to have potential as markers, with airborne levels gradually dropping and reaching background levels at 400 m distance. Salmonella was detected (at low levels) both inside and outside the shed (at 10 m). Campylobacter was detected only once inside the shed during the 3-year period (at low levels). Results showed there was minimal risk to humans living adjacent to poultry farms This is the first comprehensive analysis studying key food-safety pathogens and potential public health risks associated with intensively farmed pigs and poultry in Australia.","PeriodicalId":35552,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"http://era.daf.qld.gov.au/id/eprint/4852/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25913/5ea65d87d8474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Intensive pig and poultry farming in Australia can be a source of pathogens with implications for food-safety and/or human illness. Seven studies were undertaken with the following objectives:  Assess the types of zoonotic pathogens in waste  Assess the transfer of pathogens during re-use both within the shed and externally in the environment  The potential for movement of pathogens via aerosols In the first and second studies the extent of zoonotic pathogens was evaluated in both piggery effluent and chicken litter and Salmonella and Campylobacter were detected in both wastes. In the third study the dynamics of Salmonella during litter re-use was examined and results showed a trend for lower Salmonella levels and serovar diversity in re-used litter compared to new litter. Thus, re-use within the poultry farming system posed no increased risk. The fourth study addressed the direct risks of pathogens to farm workers due to reuse of piggery effluent within the pig shed. Based on air-borne Escherichia coli (E. coli) levels, re-using effluent did not pose a risk. In the fifth study high levels of Arcobacter spp. were detected in effluent ponds and freshly irrigated soils with potential food-safety risks during the irrigation of food-crops and pasture. The sixth and seventh studies addressed the risks from aerosols from mechanically ventilated sheds. Staphylococci were shown to have potential as markers, with airborne levels gradually dropping and reaching background levels at 400 m distance. Salmonella was detected (at low levels) both inside and outside the shed (at 10 m). Campylobacter was detected only once inside the shed during the 3-year period (at low levels). Results showed there was minimal risk to humans living adjacent to poultry farms This is the first comprehensive analysis studying key food-safety pathogens and potential public health risks associated with intensively farmed pigs and poultry in Australia.
与集约化养猪和家禽养殖环境相关的主要食源性病原体的命运
澳大利亚集约化的猪和家禽养殖可能是病原体的来源,对食品安全和/或人类疾病有影响。进行了七项研究,目的如下:评估废物中人畜共患病病原体的类型评估棚内和外部环境中重复使用期间病原体的转移评估病原体通过气溶胶移动的可能性在第一和第二项研究中,评估了猪舍废水和鸡窝中人畜共患病病原体的程度,并在两种废物中检测到沙门氏菌和弯曲杆菌。第三项研究考察了凋落物重复利用过程中沙门氏菌的动态变化,结果表明,与新凋落物相比,重复利用凋落物中沙门氏菌水平和血清型多样性有降低的趋势。因此,在家禽养殖系统内重复使用不会增加风险。第四项研究解决了猪舍内猪舍污水再利用对农场工人造成的病原体直接风险。根据空气传播的大肠杆菌(E. coli)水平,废水的再利用不构成风险。在第五项研究中,在粮食作物和牧草灌溉过程中,在污水池和新鲜灌溉土壤中检测到高水平的Arcobacter spp。第六和第七项研究解决了机械通风棚内气溶胶带来的风险。葡萄球菌具有作为标记物的潜力,其在空气中的水平逐渐下降,并在400米距离处达到背景水平。在棚内和棚外(10米处)均检测到沙门氏菌(低水平)。3年期间在棚内仅检出1例弯曲杆菌(低水平)。结果显示,居住在家禽养殖场附近的人类面临的风险很小。这是对澳大利亚集约化养殖的猪和家禽相关的主要食品安全病原体和潜在公共卫生风险进行的首次全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书