Clinical effectiveness of progesterone in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Ashish Rai, Jitendra Singh Shekhawat, Gaurav Jain, Sripadma P.V.
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of progesterone in acute traumatic spinal cord injury","authors":"Ashish Rai, Jitendra Singh Shekhawat, Gaurav Jain, Sripadma P.V.","doi":"10.33962/roneuro-2024-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: With only limited treatment options in acute spinal cord injury (SCI) currently available, we aimed to investigate the effect of progesterone on neurological recovery after acute SCI. Material and Methods: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled single-centre trial on 128 patients of acute SCI (within 24 hours of injury) was conducted at our institute with the approval of the ethics committee. Eligible patients were allocated to the progesterone or placebo arm. Of 133 eligible patients, one from the placebo arm expired in the acute phase while 4 were lost to follow-up, leaving 128 patients in the study.68 patients remained in the progesterone arm and 60 in placebo. Patients in the progesterone arm received intramuscular progesterone while those in the placebo received intramuscular isotonic saline twice daily for five consecutive days. Neurological assessment was done at baseline, day six, first and sixth months using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score and motor and sensory actual neural recovery (ANR) scores. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At the end of six months, significant improvement occurred in motor and sensory ASIA scores in the progesterone arm (p=<0.01). Compared with the placebo, motor scores were significantly higher in the progesterone arm at 6 months while sensory scores were not (p= <0.01 and p= 0.59 respectively). Additionally, at 6 months, motor ANR was significantly higher in the progesterone arm vs placebo (p=<0.01 vs 0.65). Early progesterone administration (within six hours of injury) was associated with significantly higher motor and sensory ASIA scores at 6 months (p= <0.01vs0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Administration of intramuscular progesterone within 24 hours in acute SCI was associated with better neurological recovery. Further multicentric studies are required to shed more light on the strength and consistency of this improved outcome.","PeriodicalId":30188,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Neurosurgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/download/2605/1840","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2024-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: With only limited treatment options in acute spinal cord injury (SCI) currently available, we aimed to investigate the effect of progesterone on neurological recovery after acute SCI. Material and Methods: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled single-centre trial on 128 patients of acute SCI (within 24 hours of injury) was conducted at our institute with the approval of the ethics committee. Eligible patients were allocated to the progesterone or placebo arm. Of 133 eligible patients, one from the placebo arm expired in the acute phase while 4 were lost to follow-up, leaving 128 patients in the study.68 patients remained in the progesterone arm and 60 in placebo. Patients in the progesterone arm received intramuscular progesterone while those in the placebo received intramuscular isotonic saline twice daily for five consecutive days. Neurological assessment was done at baseline, day six, first and sixth months using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score and motor and sensory actual neural recovery (ANR) scores. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At the end of six months, significant improvement occurred in motor and sensory ASIA scores in the progesterone arm (p=<0.01). Compared with the placebo, motor scores were significantly higher in the progesterone arm at 6 months while sensory scores were not (p= <0.01 and p= 0.59 respectively). Additionally, at 6 months, motor ANR was significantly higher in the progesterone arm vs placebo (p=<0.01 vs 0.65). Early progesterone administration (within six hours of injury) was associated with significantly higher motor and sensory ASIA scores at 6 months (p= <0.01vs0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Administration of intramuscular progesterone within 24 hours in acute SCI was associated with better neurological recovery. Further multicentric studies are required to shed more light on the strength and consistency of this improved outcome.
黄体酮治疗急性外伤性脊髓损伤的临床疗效
目的:由于目前急性脊髓损伤(SCI)的治疗方案有限,我们旨在研究黄体酮对急性脊髓损伤后神经功能恢复的影响。材料与方法:经伦理委员会批准,在我院对128例急性SCI(损伤后24小时内)患者进行随机双盲安慰剂对照单中心试验。符合条件的患者被分配到黄体酮组或安慰剂组。在133名符合条件的患者中,安慰剂组的1名患者在急性期死亡,4名患者失去随访,剩下128名患者在研究中。68名患者留在黄体酮组,60名患者留在安慰剂组。黄体酮组患者接受肌肉注射黄体酮,而安慰剂组患者接受肌肉注射等渗盐水,每天两次,连续5天。使用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)评分和运动和感觉实际神经恢复(ANR)评分在基线、第6天、第1和第6个月进行神经学评估。结果:两组间基线特征具有可比性。6个月后,黄体酮组运动和感觉ASIA评分显著改善(p=<0.01)。与安慰剂组相比,孕酮组6个月时运动评分显著提高,而感觉评分无显著差异(p= <;0.01和p= 0.59)。此外,在6个月时,黄体酮组的运动ANR明显高于安慰剂组(p=<0.01 vs 0.65)。早期黄体酮治疗(损伤6小时内)与6个月时运动和感觉ASIA评分显著升高相关(p= <0.01vs0.04)。结论:急性脊髓损伤患者24小时内肌注黄体酮可改善神经功能恢复。需要进一步的多中心研究来进一步阐明这种改善结果的强度和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书