Decomposition–Quantum Hybrid Model for Accurate Reservoir Inflow Prediction: A Case Study on Khoda Afarin Dam

IF 2.3 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Solid Earth Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI:10.3390/earth7020035
Erfan Abdi, Mohammad Taghi Sattari, Saeed Samadianfard, Sajjad Ahmad
{"title":"Decomposition–Quantum Hybrid Model for Accurate Reservoir Inflow Prediction: A Case Study on Khoda Afarin Dam","authors":"Erfan Abdi, Mohammad Taghi Sattari, Saeed Samadianfard, Sajjad Ahmad","doi":"10.3390/earth7020035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reservoir management, flood control, and operational planning are the benefits of dam inflow forecasting. Decomposition algorithms can decompose complex inflow data into intrinsic components and reduce noise and fluctuations, while quantum machine learning models use features such as superposition and entanglement to manage large datasets and capture nonlinear hydrological behaviors. This study used three models: random forest (RF) as a classical benchmark, hybrid quantum neural network (HQNN) as a quantum approach, and sequential variational mode decomposition with HQNN (SVMD-HQNN) that integrates decomposition and quantum learning. The modeling was applied to forecast the inflow to Khoda Afarin Dam over 16 years (2009–2024) in two scenarios that included hydrological parameters (precipitation and evaporation) and reservoir parameters (water level, volume, and surface area). The data was divided into training and testing sets in a ratio of 70:30. The results showed that SVMD-HQNN achieved higher accuracy than the other two models with RMSE = 34.51, R2 = 0.93, NSE = 0.91, MAPE = 11.48%, and KGE = 0.89 in scenario (i) and RMSE = 25.74, R2 = 0.95, NSE = 0.94, MAPE = 8.98%, and KGE = 0.93 in scenario (ii). In the first scenario, this approach increased the prediction accuracy by 43.71%, and in the second scenario, it increased the prediction accuracy by 45.47% compared to the HQNN model. The proposed SVMD-HQNN framework is particularly effective under climate change conditions, where inflow fluctuations and instability are significant, and provides robust and generalizable predictions for reservoirs in similar environments.","PeriodicalId":21912,"journal":{"name":"Solid Earth","volume":"7 2","pages":"35-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/7/2/35/pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/earth7020035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservoir management, flood control, and operational planning are the benefits of dam inflow forecasting. Decomposition algorithms can decompose complex inflow data into intrinsic components and reduce noise and fluctuations, while quantum machine learning models use features such as superposition and entanglement to manage large datasets and capture nonlinear hydrological behaviors. This study used three models: random forest (RF) as a classical benchmark, hybrid quantum neural network (HQNN) as a quantum approach, and sequential variational mode decomposition with HQNN (SVMD-HQNN) that integrates decomposition and quantum learning. The modeling was applied to forecast the inflow to Khoda Afarin Dam over 16 years (2009–2024) in two scenarios that included hydrological parameters (precipitation and evaporation) and reservoir parameters (water level, volume, and surface area). The data was divided into training and testing sets in a ratio of 70:30. The results showed that SVMD-HQNN achieved higher accuracy than the other two models with RMSE = 34.51, R2 = 0.93, NSE = 0.91, MAPE = 11.48%, and KGE = 0.89 in scenario (i) and RMSE = 25.74, R2 = 0.95, NSE = 0.94, MAPE = 8.98%, and KGE = 0.93 in scenario (ii). In the first scenario, this approach increased the prediction accuracy by 43.71%, and in the second scenario, it increased the prediction accuracy by 45.47% compared to the HQNN model. The proposed SVMD-HQNN framework is particularly effective under climate change conditions, where inflow fluctuations and instability are significant, and provides robust and generalizable predictions for reservoirs in similar environments.
库区入流精确预测的分解-量子混合模型——以Khoda Afarin大坝为例
水库管理、防洪和业务规划是大坝入流预测的好处。分解算法可以将复杂的流入数据分解为内在成分,减少噪声和波动,而量子机器学习模型使用叠加和纠缠等特征来管理大型数据集并捕获非线性水文行为。本研究采用随机森林(random forest, RF)作为经典基准,混合量子神经网络(hybrid quantum neural network, HQNN)作为量子方法,结合分解和量子学习的HQNN序列变分模态分解(SVMD-HQNN)三种模型。应用该模型对Khoda Afarin大坝16年(2009-2024)来水量进行了水文参数(降水和蒸发)和水库参数(水位、体积和表面积)两种情景下的预测。数据按70:30的比例分为训练集和测试集。结果表明,SVMD-HQNN在情景(i)中RMSE = 34.51, R2 = 0.93, NSE = 0.91, MAPE = 11.48%, KGE = 0.89,在情景(ii)中RMSE = 25.74, R2 = 0.95, NSE = 0.94, MAPE = 8.98%, KGE = 0.93,均优于其他两种模型。在第一个场景中,该方法比HQNN模型的预测精度提高了43.71%,在第二个场景中,该方法比HQNN模型的预测精度提高了45.47%。所提出的SVMD-HQNN框架在气候变化条件下特别有效,其中流入波动和不稳定性显著,并为类似环境下的水库提供了稳健和可推广的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solid Earth
Solid Earth GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Solid Earth (SE) is a not-for-profit journal that publishes multidisciplinary research on the composition, structure, dynamics of the Earth from the surface to the deep interior at all spatial and temporal scales. The journal invites contributions encompassing observational, experimental, and theoretical investigations in the form of short communications, research articles, method articles, review articles, and discussion and commentaries on all aspects of the solid Earth (for details see manuscript types). Being interdisciplinary in scope, SE covers the following disciplines: geochemistry, mineralogy, petrology, volcanology; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics: numerical and analogue modeling of geoprocesses; geoelectrics and electromagnetics; geomagnetism; geomorphology, morphotectonics, and paleoseismology; rock physics; seismics and seismology; critical zone science (Earth''s permeable near-surface layer); stratigraphy, sedimentology, and palaeontology; rock deformation, structural geology, and tectonics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书