Evaluation of a self-instructional self-regulated learning material in mathematics

IF 2.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andreia Balan, Anders Jönsson
{"title":"Evaluation of a self-instructional self-regulated learning material in mathematics","authors":"Andreia Balan, Anders Jönsson","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2025.1507803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Success in school is closely linked to students’ ability to regulate their own learning. In mathematics, self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies can help students become more independent and proactive in their learning. However, there is limited research on how students can be effectively supported in developing and applying these strategies, especially for younger students. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a self-instructional SRL material. The material is designed in collaboration between researchers and teachers, and integrated into regular mathematics instruction. Specifically, we examine whether the use of the SRL material varies across schools and student groups. A quasi-experimental research design with pre- and post-tests was employed, involving 258 students in grades 5 and 6 from five different schools over the course of one semester. Data was collected through structured surveys measuring student engagement with the material, along with performance tracking before and after the intervention. The findings indicate that co-developing SRL materials with teachers, and embedding them in regular instruction, has clear advantages. The findings also show that while the material was used equally across genders and performance levels, variations remain due to school culture, socio-economic factors, and individual teacher influence. Notably, lower-performing students showed greater progress compared to high-performers, and girls engaged more actively with SRL strategies than boys. These findings have important implications for the design and implementation of SRL interventions. While integrating SRL support within everyday teaching fosters engagement, additional measures may be needed to address persistent disparities between schools and student groups.","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1507803/pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1507803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Success in school is closely linked to students’ ability to regulate their own learning. In mathematics, self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies can help students become more independent and proactive in their learning. However, there is limited research on how students can be effectively supported in developing and applying these strategies, especially for younger students. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a self-instructional SRL material. The material is designed in collaboration between researchers and teachers, and integrated into regular mathematics instruction. Specifically, we examine whether the use of the SRL material varies across schools and student groups. A quasi-experimental research design with pre- and post-tests was employed, involving 258 students in grades 5 and 6 from five different schools over the course of one semester. Data was collected through structured surveys measuring student engagement with the material, along with performance tracking before and after the intervention. The findings indicate that co-developing SRL materials with teachers, and embedding them in regular instruction, has clear advantages. The findings also show that while the material was used equally across genders and performance levels, variations remain due to school culture, socio-economic factors, and individual teacher influence. Notably, lower-performing students showed greater progress compared to high-performers, and girls engaged more actively with SRL strategies than boys. These findings have important implications for the design and implementation of SRL interventions. While integrating SRL support within everyday teaching fosters engagement, additional measures may be needed to address persistent disparities between schools and student groups.
一种数学自学教材的评价
在学校的成功与学生调节自己学习的能力密切相关。在数学学习中,自我调节学习策略可以帮助学生在学习中变得更加独立和主动。然而,关于如何有效地支持学生开发和应用这些策略的研究有限,特别是对于年轻学生。本研究的目的是评估一份自我指导的SRL材料的影响。这些材料是由研究人员和教师合作设计的,并整合到常规的数学教学中。具体而言,我们考察了SRL材料的使用是否因学校和学生群体而异。采用准实验研究设计,对来自5所不同学校的258名五年级和六年级学生进行了一个学期的前后测试。数据是通过结构化调查收集的,测量学生对材料的参与程度,以及干预前后的表现跟踪。研究结果表明,与教师共同开发SRL材料并将其嵌入常规教学中具有明显的优势。研究结果还表明,尽管这些材料在性别和表现水平上都是平等的,但由于学校文化、社会经济因素和教师个人的影响,差异仍然存在。值得注意的是,与表现优异的学生相比,表现较差的学生表现出更大的进步,女孩比男孩更积极地使用SRL策略。这些发现对SRL干预措施的设计和实施具有重要意义。虽然在日常教学中整合SRL支持可以促进参与,但可能需要采取其他措施来解决学校和学生群体之间持续存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书