In need of improvement: archaeological evidence of river management in South-Eastern Australia

Susan Lawrence, Peter Davies
{"title":"In need of improvement: archaeological evidence of river management in South-Eastern Australia","authors":"Susan Lawrence, Peter Davies","doi":"10.1007/s12685-024-00349-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patterns of river modification since settler invasion of southern Australia are the product of a specific set of deep-seated and implicit cultural values concerning the purpose and function of waterways. Rivers have been dammed, diverted, dredged and straightened to meet a range of human needs and objectives. Such changes are routinely described as ‘improvements’ but there is a lack of critical engagement with what ‘improvement’ might mean. Interventions carried out initially on an ad hoc basis, and later more systematically with state support, collectively shed light on the persistent underlying drive to ‘Improve’ nature and society that has permeated Western thought since the Enlightenment. Here we use the example of one river system, the Loddon, to analyse ways in which Improvement intersected with settler engagement with Australian rivers. We argue that settler interventions have been informed by a consistent set of understandings about the purpose of rivers. The characteristics of water management infrastructure along the Loddon reveal how the river fell short of the settler-colonial ideal and why they thought it needed to be Improved at all.","PeriodicalId":75314,"journal":{"name":"Water history","volume":"16 2-3","pages":"247-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12685-024-00349-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water history","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-024-00349-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Patterns of river modification since settler invasion of southern Australia are the product of a specific set of deep-seated and implicit cultural values concerning the purpose and function of waterways. Rivers have been dammed, diverted, dredged and straightened to meet a range of human needs and objectives. Such changes are routinely described as ‘improvements’ but there is a lack of critical engagement with what ‘improvement’ might mean. Interventions carried out initially on an ad hoc basis, and later more systematically with state support, collectively shed light on the persistent underlying drive to ‘Improve’ nature and society that has permeated Western thought since the Enlightenment. Here we use the example of one river system, the Loddon, to analyse ways in which Improvement intersected with settler engagement with Australian rivers. We argue that settler interventions have been informed by a consistent set of understandings about the purpose of rivers. The characteristics of water management infrastructure along the Loddon reveal how the river fell short of the settler-colonial ideal and why they thought it needed to be Improved at all.
需要改进:澳大利亚东南部河流管理的考古证据
自南澳大利亚移民入侵以来,河流的改造模式是一套关于水道目的和功能的特定的根深蒂固的隐含文化价值观的产物。河流被筑坝、改道、疏浚和拉直,以满足人类的一系列需求和目标。这些变化通常被描述为“改进”,但缺乏对“改进”可能意味着什么的批判性参与。最初的干预是在临时的基础上进行的,后来在国家的支持下更加系统地进行了干预,共同揭示了自启蒙运动以来一直渗透在西方思想中的“改善”自然和社会的持久潜在动力。在这里,我们以一个河流系统为例,Loddon,来分析改善与澳大利亚河流的定居者互动的方式。我们认为,定居者的干预是通过对河流用途的一套一致的理解来进行的。伦敦河沿岸水资源管理基础设施的特点揭示了这条河是如何不符合定居者-殖民理想的,以及为什么他们认为它需要改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书