Rethinking climate impacts and livestock emissions through transhumant pastoralism in Jammu and Kashmir

IF 3.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Irfan Ali Banka, M.A. Rashid, Ramesh Sahani
{"title":"Rethinking climate impacts and livestock emissions through transhumant pastoralism in Jammu and Kashmir","authors":"Irfan Ali Banka, M.A. Rashid, Ramesh Sahani","doi":"10.3389/past.2025.14926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconsiders the climate implications of transhumant pastoralism through an ethnographic case study of the Chopan pastoralists in the alpine grasslands of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Amid dominant global climate narratives that homogenize livestock systems and often portray them as ecologically harmful, this study highlights the need for differentiated assessments that recognize the distinctiveness of extensive, low-input systems. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in the high-altitude Trajan pasture, we demonstrate how Chopan pastoralism makes ecologically efficient use of marginal environments through adaptive mobility, rotational grazing, and traditional ecological knowledge. Contrary to assumptions of overgrazing and degradation, our analysis—grounded in forage yield estimates and carrying capacity calculations—suggests that current grazing pressure remains well within sustainable limits. Moreover, the Chopans contribute to regional food security, mediate human-wildlife interactions, and promote soil fertility through natural nutrient cycling. Yet, these pastoralists remain structurally marginalized in policy frameworks and face increasing constraints from land-use change, forest restrictions, and infrastructural encroachments. We argue for the inclusion of pastoralist perspectives in climate policy debates and for a revaluation of transhumant systems as viable models of low-impact, climate-resilient land use. The study advances broader discussions on sustainability, ecological justice, and the role of traditional livelihoods in contemporary environmental governance.","PeriodicalId":46166,"journal":{"name":"Pastoralism-Research Policy and Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/pastoralism-research-policy-and-practice/articles/10.3389/past.2025.14926/pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoralism-Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/past.2025.14926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article reconsiders the climate implications of transhumant pastoralism through an ethnographic case study of the Chopan pastoralists in the alpine grasslands of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Amid dominant global climate narratives that homogenize livestock systems and often portray them as ecologically harmful, this study highlights the need for differentiated assessments that recognize the distinctiveness of extensive, low-input systems. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in the high-altitude Trajan pasture, we demonstrate how Chopan pastoralism makes ecologically efficient use of marginal environments through adaptive mobility, rotational grazing, and traditional ecological knowledge. Contrary to assumptions of overgrazing and degradation, our analysis—grounded in forage yield estimates and carrying capacity calculations—suggests that current grazing pressure remains well within sustainable limits. Moreover, the Chopans contribute to regional food security, mediate human-wildlife interactions, and promote soil fertility through natural nutrient cycling. Yet, these pastoralists remain structurally marginalized in policy frameworks and face increasing constraints from land-use change, forest restrictions, and infrastructural encroachments. We argue for the inclusion of pastoralist perspectives in climate policy debates and for a revaluation of transhumant systems as viable models of low-impact, climate-resilient land use. The study advances broader discussions on sustainability, ecological justice, and the role of traditional livelihoods in contemporary environmental governance.
重新思考查谟和克什米尔地区的气候影响和牲畜排放
本文通过对印度查谟和克什米尔高山草原上的Chopan牧民的民族志案例研究,重新考虑了迁移畜牧业对气候的影响。在主流的全球气候叙事中,畜牧业系统同质化,并经常将其描述为生态有害的,本研究强调有必要进行差异化评估,以认识到粗放、低投入系统的独特性。通过在高海拔的图拉真牧场进行的实地调查,我们展示了Chopan畜牧业如何通过适应性流动、轮牧和传统生态知识有效地利用边缘环境。与过度放牧和退化的假设相反,我们基于饲料产量估算和承载能力计算的分析表明,目前的放牧压力仍在可持续的范围内。此外,Chopans还有助于区域粮食安全,调节人类与野生动物的相互作用,并通过自然养分循环促进土壤肥力。然而,这些牧民在政策框架中仍然处于结构性边缘化地位,并面临土地利用变化、森林限制和基础设施侵占等日益严重的制约。我们主张在气候政策辩论中纳入牧民的观点,并重新评估迁移系统作为低影响、气候适应型土地利用的可行模式。该研究推动了对可持续性、生态正义以及传统生计在当代环境治理中的作用的更广泛讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice is an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal on extensive livestock production systems throughout the world. Pastoralists rely on rangelands and livestock for their livelihoods, but exhibit different levels of mobility and market involvement, and operate under a variety of different land tenure regimes. Pastoralism publishes research that influences public policy, to improve the welfare of these people and better conserve the environments in which they live. The journal investigates pastoralism from a variety of disciplinary perspectives across the biophysical, social and economic sciences. This is not applied research in the traditional sense, but relevant research, sometimes even basic research, with the capacity ultimately to change the way practical people do business. Predicting what kind of research will fulfil this role is virtually impossible. What we can do is keep policy makers, practitioners and pastoralists talking to scientists and researchers and aware of each others'' concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书