“The Biggest Problem With You…”: Racial Profiling and Canada’s Program of Extra-Territorial Migrant Interdiction

IF 0.5 Q2 LAW
Simon Wallace, Benjamin Perryman, Gábor Lukács, Sean Rehaag
{"title":"“The Biggest Problem With You…”: Racial Profiling and Canada’s Program of Extra-Territorial Migrant Interdiction","authors":"Simon Wallace, Benjamin Perryman, Gábor Lukács, Sean Rehaag","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, two Roma-Hungarian travellers were prevented from boarding their flight to Canada. Even though their documents were in order and their travel was legitimate, they were singled out for examination and extra scrutiny. This article—relying on new evidence produced in a series of legal proceedings—shows how Canada has implemented a de facto system of racial profiling in airports overseas. This program was not built overnight, but produced by a series of historical accretions, all organized around the idea that potential refugees can be detected by their race. This article shows how Canada, to deter asylum seekers, has conscripted private actors to screen out some migrants. In this study, we explain how this racial profiling regime operates and test its legality against international legal instruments. We argue that this law offends basic Canadian legal commitments and that the practice ought to end.","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4071&context=ohlj","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.4071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, two Roma-Hungarian travellers were prevented from boarding their flight to Canada. Even though their documents were in order and their travel was legitimate, they were singled out for examination and extra scrutiny. This article—relying on new evidence produced in a series of legal proceedings—shows how Canada has implemented a de facto system of racial profiling in airports overseas. This program was not built overnight, but produced by a series of historical accretions, all organized around the idea that potential refugees can be detected by their race. This article shows how Canada, to deter asylum seekers, has conscripted private actors to screen out some migrants. In this study, we explain how this racial profiling regime operates and test its legality against international legal instruments. We argue that this law offends basic Canadian legal commitments and that the practice ought to end.
“你最大的问题……”:种族定性和加拿大的域外移民拦截计划
2019年,两名罗姆-匈牙利旅行者被阻止登上飞往加拿大的航班。尽管他们的证件齐全,旅行也合法,但他们还是被挑出来接受检查和额外审查。这篇文章基于一系列法律程序中产生的新证据,展示了加拿大如何在海外机场实施事实上的种族定性系统。这个项目不是一夜之间建立起来的,而是由一系列的历史积累产生的,所有这些都围绕着一个理念,即潜在的难民可以通过他们的种族被发现。这篇文章展示了加拿大为了阻止寻求庇护者,是如何征召私人演员来筛选一些移民的。在这项研究中,我们解释了这种种族貌相制度是如何运作的,并根据国际法律文书检验了其合法性。我们认为,这项法律违反了加拿大的基本法律承诺,这种做法应该终止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书