Simulation of bubbly flow in non-Newtonian fluids using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model based on the entire turbulent energy spectrum

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Xiaokai Yang, Dawei Qu, Tianyuan Xia, Yongfeng Liu
{"title":"Simulation of bubbly flow in non-Newtonian fluids using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model based on the entire turbulent energy spectrum","authors":"Xiaokai Yang, Dawei Qu, Tianyuan Xia, Yongfeng Liu","doi":"10.1063/5.0303266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the effects of interfacial force models and the coalescence and breakup models for bubbly flow simulation in non-Newtonian fluids, visualization experiments were conducted in a rectangle bubble column. Particle image velocimetry and shadowgraphy were employed to measure bubbly flow in shear-thinning fluids. By extending the kernel functions to the entire turbulent energy spectrum, the simulation accurately captured bubble coalescence and breakup behaviors, leading to improved predictions of bubble size distribution. The results indicate that the Liao and Lehr models underestimated bubble coalescence frequency, while the Luo model overestimated it. The Prince–Blanch model provided the most accurate description of bubble size and distribution. The primary mechanisms driving bubble coalescence in the system were identified as buoyancy-driven motion, wake entrainment, and viscous shear. A comparison of drag force models developed for non-Newtonian fluids in previous literature revealed that, at low superficial gas velocities, the differences in predicted velocity fields and bubble sizes among various drag models were minimal. However, the HosenB and Li models predicted larger liquid velocity. As the superficial gas velocity increased, these discrepancies became more pronounced, with all models except HosenB underestimating the velocity. Additionally, other interfacial forces, including lift force, turbulent dispersion force, and wall lubrication force, were compared, revealing that lift force and turbulent dispersion force significantly influenced the simulation outcomes.","PeriodicalId":20066,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0303266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effects of interfacial force models and the coalescence and breakup models for bubbly flow simulation in non-Newtonian fluids, visualization experiments were conducted in a rectangle bubble column. Particle image velocimetry and shadowgraphy were employed to measure bubbly flow in shear-thinning fluids. By extending the kernel functions to the entire turbulent energy spectrum, the simulation accurately captured bubble coalescence and breakup behaviors, leading to improved predictions of bubble size distribution. The results indicate that the Liao and Lehr models underestimated bubble coalescence frequency, while the Luo model overestimated it. The Prince–Blanch model provided the most accurate description of bubble size and distribution. The primary mechanisms driving bubble coalescence in the system were identified as buoyancy-driven motion, wake entrainment, and viscous shear. A comparison of drag force models developed for non-Newtonian fluids in previous literature revealed that, at low superficial gas velocities, the differences in predicted velocity fields and bubble sizes among various drag models were minimal. However, the HosenB and Li models predicted larger liquid velocity. As the superficial gas velocity increased, these discrepancies became more pronounced, with all models except HosenB underestimating the velocity. Additionally, other interfacial forces, including lift force, turbulent dispersion force, and wall lubrication force, were compared, revealing that lift force and turbulent dispersion force significantly influenced the simulation outcomes.
基于全湍流能谱的计算流体动力学和种群平衡模型模拟非牛顿流体中的气泡流动
为了研究界面力模型和聚并破裂模型对非牛顿流体气泡流动模拟的影响,在矩形气泡柱中进行了可视化实验。采用粒子图像测速法和阴影法对剪切稀化流体中的气泡流动进行了测量。通过将核函数扩展到整个湍流能谱,模拟准确地捕获了气泡的聚并和破裂行为,从而改进了气泡尺寸分布的预测。结果表明,Liao和Lehr模型低估了气泡合并频率,而Luo模型高估了气泡合并频率。普林斯-布兰奇模型对气泡的大小和分布提供了最准确的描述。系统中驱动气泡合并的主要机制被确定为浮力驱动运动、尾迹夹带和粘性剪切。对以往文献中针对非牛顿流体开发的阻力模型的比较表明,在较低的表面气体速度下,各种阻力模型之间预测的速度场和气泡大小的差异很小。然而,HosenB和Li模型预测了更大的液体速度。随着表面气体速度的增加,这些差异变得更加明显,除了HosenB之外的所有模型都低估了速度。此外,还比较了升力、湍流弥散力和壁面润滑力等其他界面力,发现升力和湍流弥散力对模拟结果有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics of Fluids
Physics of Fluids 物理-力学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
41.30%
发文量
2063
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Physics of Fluids (PoF) is a preeminent journal devoted to publishing original theoretical, computational, and experimental contributions to the understanding of the dynamics of gases, liquids, and complex or multiphase fluids. Topics published in PoF are diverse and reflect the most important subjects in fluid dynamics, including, but not limited to: -Acoustics -Aerospace and aeronautical flow -Astrophysical flow -Biofluid mechanics -Cavitation and cavitating flows -Combustion flows -Complex fluids -Compressible flow -Computational fluid dynamics -Contact lines -Continuum mechanics -Convection -Cryogenic flow -Droplets -Electrical and magnetic effects in fluid flow -Foam, bubble, and film mechanics -Flow control -Flow instability and transition -Flow orientation and anisotropy -Flows with other transport phenomena -Flows with complex boundary conditions -Flow visualization -Fluid mechanics -Fluid physical properties -Fluid–structure interactions -Free surface flows -Geophysical flow -Interfacial flow -Knudsen flow -Laminar flow -Liquid crystals -Mathematics of fluids -Micro- and nanofluid mechanics -Mixing -Molecular theory -Nanofluidics -Particulate, multiphase, and granular flow -Processing flows -Relativistic fluid mechanics -Rotating flows -Shock wave phenomena -Soft matter -Stratified flows -Supercritical fluids -Superfluidity -Thermodynamics of flow systems -Transonic flow -Turbulent flow -Viscous and non-Newtonian flow -Viscoelasticity -Vortex dynamics -Waves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书