Simulation of bubbly flow in non-Newtonian fluids using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model based on the entire turbulent energy spectrum
Xiaokai Yang, Dawei Qu, Tianyuan Xia, Yongfeng Liu
{"title":"Simulation of bubbly flow in non-Newtonian fluids using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model based on the entire turbulent energy spectrum","authors":"Xiaokai Yang, Dawei Qu, Tianyuan Xia, Yongfeng Liu","doi":"10.1063/5.0303266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the effects of interfacial force models and the coalescence and breakup models for bubbly flow simulation in non-Newtonian fluids, visualization experiments were conducted in a rectangle bubble column. Particle image velocimetry and shadowgraphy were employed to measure bubbly flow in shear-thinning fluids. By extending the kernel functions to the entire turbulent energy spectrum, the simulation accurately captured bubble coalescence and breakup behaviors, leading to improved predictions of bubble size distribution. The results indicate that the Liao and Lehr models underestimated bubble coalescence frequency, while the Luo model overestimated it. The Prince–Blanch model provided the most accurate description of bubble size and distribution. The primary mechanisms driving bubble coalescence in the system were identified as buoyancy-driven motion, wake entrainment, and viscous shear. A comparison of drag force models developed for non-Newtonian fluids in previous literature revealed that, at low superficial gas velocities, the differences in predicted velocity fields and bubble sizes among various drag models were minimal. However, the HosenB and Li models predicted larger liquid velocity. As the superficial gas velocity increased, these discrepancies became more pronounced, with all models except HosenB underestimating the velocity. Additionally, other interfacial forces, including lift force, turbulent dispersion force, and wall lubrication force, were compared, revealing that lift force and turbulent dispersion force significantly influenced the simulation outcomes.","PeriodicalId":20066,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0303266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To investigate the effects of interfacial force models and the coalescence and breakup models for bubbly flow simulation in non-Newtonian fluids, visualization experiments were conducted in a rectangle bubble column. Particle image velocimetry and shadowgraphy were employed to measure bubbly flow in shear-thinning fluids. By extending the kernel functions to the entire turbulent energy spectrum, the simulation accurately captured bubble coalescence and breakup behaviors, leading to improved predictions of bubble size distribution. The results indicate that the Liao and Lehr models underestimated bubble coalescence frequency, while the Luo model overestimated it. The Prince–Blanch model provided the most accurate description of bubble size and distribution. The primary mechanisms driving bubble coalescence in the system were identified as buoyancy-driven motion, wake entrainment, and viscous shear. A comparison of drag force models developed for non-Newtonian fluids in previous literature revealed that, at low superficial gas velocities, the differences in predicted velocity fields and bubble sizes among various drag models were minimal. However, the HosenB and Li models predicted larger liquid velocity. As the superficial gas velocity increased, these discrepancies became more pronounced, with all models except HosenB underestimating the velocity. Additionally, other interfacial forces, including lift force, turbulent dispersion force, and wall lubrication force, were compared, revealing that lift force and turbulent dispersion force significantly influenced the simulation outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Physics of Fluids (PoF) is a preeminent journal devoted to publishing original theoretical, computational, and experimental contributions to the understanding of the dynamics of gases, liquids, and complex or multiphase fluids. Topics published in PoF are diverse and reflect the most important subjects in fluid dynamics, including, but not limited to:
-Acoustics
-Aerospace and aeronautical flow
-Astrophysical flow
-Biofluid mechanics
-Cavitation and cavitating flows
-Combustion flows
-Complex fluids
-Compressible flow
-Computational fluid dynamics
-Contact lines
-Continuum mechanics
-Convection
-Cryogenic flow
-Droplets
-Electrical and magnetic effects in fluid flow
-Foam, bubble, and film mechanics
-Flow control
-Flow instability and transition
-Flow orientation and anisotropy
-Flows with other transport phenomena
-Flows with complex boundary conditions
-Flow visualization
-Fluid mechanics
-Fluid physical properties
-Fluid–structure interactions
-Free surface flows
-Geophysical flow
-Interfacial flow
-Knudsen flow
-Laminar flow
-Liquid crystals
-Mathematics of fluids
-Micro- and nanofluid mechanics
-Mixing
-Molecular theory
-Nanofluidics
-Particulate, multiphase, and granular flow
-Processing flows
-Relativistic fluid mechanics
-Rotating flows
-Shock wave phenomena
-Soft matter
-Stratified flows
-Supercritical fluids
-Superfluidity
-Thermodynamics of flow systems
-Transonic flow
-Turbulent flow
-Viscous and non-Newtonian flow
-Viscoelasticity
-Vortex dynamics
-Waves