Recovering Attached Crude Oil from Hydrodesulfurization Spent Catalysts

Q4 Environmental Science
Hong Xin, Jingyi Chen, Jing Wei, Wenjie Wu, Ziyan Yang, Jing Chen, Shuchen Sun, Faxin Xiao, Ganfeng Tu
{"title":"Recovering Attached Crude Oil from Hydrodesulfurization Spent Catalysts","authors":"Hong Xin, Jingyi Chen, Jing Wei, Wenjie Wu, Ziyan Yang, Jing Chen, Shuchen Sun, Faxin Xiao, Ganfeng Tu","doi":"10.3390/recycling10010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As environmental awareness grows, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts have become crucial in petroleum refining, yet their use results in oil-laden waste, poses environmental risks, and complicates subsequent treatment. Efficient oil removal is thus critical for processing spent catalysts. This study systematically compares three de-oiling methods, extraction, chemical thermal washing, and pyrolysis, to identify the optimal de-oiling method. In the experiments, extraction achieves a 94.12% oil removal rate at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g, a temperature of 45 °C, and a time of 60 min, maintaining around 90% efficiency after five cycles of solvent recovery. Chemical thermal washing achieves an oil removal rate of 96.26% after 4 h at 90 °C, with 0.15 wt.% SDS, 3.0 wt.% NaOH, and a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g. The heavy oil emulsion is then decomposed with 4% CuO and 5% H2O2. The pyrolysis method removes 96.19% of oil at 600 °C in 60 min. While the extraction and chemical thermal washing methods are effective, they produce wastewater, raising environmental concerns. In contrast, the pyrolysis method is more environmentally friendly. SEM, EDS, and FT-IR analyses show that after oil removal, the metal structures on the alumina support of the spent HDS catalyst are clearly exposed, facilitating the subsequent recovery of valuable metals.","PeriodicalId":35467,"journal":{"name":"Resource Recycling","volume":"10 1","pages":"10-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/10/1/10/pdf?version=1736924550","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As environmental awareness grows, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts have become crucial in petroleum refining, yet their use results in oil-laden waste, poses environmental risks, and complicates subsequent treatment. Efficient oil removal is thus critical for processing spent catalysts. This study systematically compares three de-oiling methods, extraction, chemical thermal washing, and pyrolysis, to identify the optimal de-oiling method. In the experiments, extraction achieves a 94.12% oil removal rate at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g, a temperature of 45 °C, and a time of 60 min, maintaining around 90% efficiency after five cycles of solvent recovery. Chemical thermal washing achieves an oil removal rate of 96.26% after 4 h at 90 °C, with 0.15 wt.% SDS, 3.0 wt.% NaOH, and a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g. The heavy oil emulsion is then decomposed with 4% CuO and 5% H2O2. The pyrolysis method removes 96.19% of oil at 600 °C in 60 min. While the extraction and chemical thermal washing methods are effective, they produce wastewater, raising environmental concerns. In contrast, the pyrolysis method is more environmentally friendly. SEM, EDS, and FT-IR analyses show that after oil removal, the metal structures on the alumina support of the spent HDS catalyst are clearly exposed, facilitating the subsequent recovery of valuable metals.
从加氢脱硫废催化剂中回收附着原油
随着环保意识的增强,加氢脱硫催化剂在石油炼制中变得至关重要,但其使用会产生含油废物,带来环境风险,并使后续处理复杂化。因此,高效除油对于处理废催化剂至关重要。本研究系统比较了萃取、化学热洗和热解三种脱油方法,以确定最佳脱油方法。实验中,在液固比为10 mL/g、萃取温度为45℃、萃取时间为60 min的条件下,萃取除油率为94.12%,溶剂回收5次后萃取效率保持在90%左右。化学热洗在90℃条件下,SDS为0.15 wt.%, NaOH为3.0 wt.%,液固比为10 mL/g, 4 h后除油率为96.26%。然后用4% CuO和5% H2O2对稠油乳状液进行分解。热解法在600℃、60 min条件下,脱油率为96.19%。虽然萃取和化学热洗方法是有效的,但它们会产生废水,引起环境问题。相比之下,热解法更加环保。SEM, EDS和FT-IR分析表明,除油后,废HDS催化剂氧化铝载体上的金属结构明显暴露,有利于后续有价金属的回收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resource Recycling
Resource Recycling Environmental Science-Pollution
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书