Analisis Komparatif Performa AES-GCM dan ChaCha20-Poly1305 dalam Enkripsi Dokumen PDF Berbasis AEAD

Muhammad Patria, Dea Andini Andriati
{"title":"Analisis Komparatif Performa AES-GCM dan ChaCha20-Poly1305 dalam Enkripsi Dokumen PDF Berbasis AEAD","authors":"Muhammad Patria, Dea Andini Andriati","doi":"10.29240/arcitech.v5i1.13645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation in electronic document services demands encryption mechanisms that are not only cryptographically secure but also performance-efficient. While AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are widely adopted AEAD algorithms, prior research has largely focused on their use in communication protocols or IoT devices, rather than in encrypting PDF documents. This study addresses that gap by empirically comparing both algorithms in real-world digital document processing scenarios. A quantitative experimental method was applied across two scenarios: mass processing of 5,000 small-to-medium PDF files (100KB–8MB), and individual processing of large files (1MB–200MB). Five performance metrics were analyzed: encryption time, decryption time, total processing time, stability, and throughput. Results show that AES-GCM consistently outperformed ChaCha20-Poly1305 across all metrics, offering faster processing and greater stability. Both algorithms produced a constant file size overhead of 28 bytes, which was negligible in terms of storage efficiency. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence to guide the selection of encryption algorithms in high-performance digital document storage systems.","PeriodicalId":479269,"journal":{"name":"Arcitech Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"5 1","pages":"49-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/arcitech/article/download/13645/3611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arcitech Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/arcitech.v5i1.13645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital transformation in electronic document services demands encryption mechanisms that are not only cryptographically secure but also performance-efficient. While AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are widely adopted AEAD algorithms, prior research has largely focused on their use in communication protocols or IoT devices, rather than in encrypting PDF documents. This study addresses that gap by empirically comparing both algorithms in real-world digital document processing scenarios. A quantitative experimental method was applied across two scenarios: mass processing of 5,000 small-to-medium PDF files (100KB–8MB), and individual processing of large files (1MB–200MB). Five performance metrics were analyzed: encryption time, decryption time, total processing time, stability, and throughput. Results show that AES-GCM consistently outperformed ChaCha20-Poly1305 across all metrics, offering faster processing and greater stability. Both algorithms produced a constant file size overhead of 28 bytes, which was negligible in terms of storage efficiency. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence to guide the selection of encryption algorithms in high-performance digital document storage systems.
基于AEAD的PDF文档加密中的AES-GCM和ChaCha20-Poly1305的比较性能分析
电子文档服务的数字化转型要求加密机制不仅要具有加密安全性,而且要具有高效的性能。虽然AES-GCM和ChaCha20-Poly1305是被广泛采用的AEAD算法,但之前的研究主要集中在它们在通信协议或物联网设备中的应用,而不是加密PDF文档。本研究通过在现实世界的数字文档处理场景中经验比较两种算法来解决这一差距。定量实验方法应用于两种场景:批量处理5000个中小型PDF文件(100KB-8MB)和单独处理大文件(1MB-200MB)。分析了五个性能指标:加密时间、解密时间、总处理时间、稳定性和吞吐量。结果表明,AES-GCM在所有指标上始终优于ChaCha20-Poly1305,提供更快的处理速度和更高的稳定性。这两种算法都会产生28字节的恒定文件大小开销,这在存储效率方面可以忽略不计。本研究通过提供经验证据来指导高性能数字文档存储系统中加密算法的选择,从而对文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书