Investigating the mechanism of luteolin in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease based on network pharmacology, normal mode analysis and experimental validation

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Yi Xin, Wenlu Chang, Qing Wang
{"title":"Investigating the mechanism of luteolin in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease based on network pharmacology, normal mode analysis and experimental validation","authors":"Yi Xin, Wenlu Chang, Qing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.lddd.2025.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore the therapeutic mechanism of luteolin in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by integrating in vitro experiments, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and normal mode analysis. The impacts of luteolin on cell toxicity and survival were assessed by a CCK-8 assay using a LPS-induced HT-29 cell model of inflammation. Flow cytometry was utilized to analyze cell apoptosis. Levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were quantified using commercially available test kits, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected via flow cytometric analysis. Putative targets of luteolin were sourced from the ECTM and SuperPred databases, while genes related to IBD were acquired from the GeneCards database. Common genes between the candidate targets of luteolin and those associated with IBD were discerned by employing a Venn diagram. Subsequent functional enrichment analyses, covering both Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, were executed using the DAVID platform. A network of protein-protein interactions (PPI) was constructed with the STRING database and graphically represented in Cytoscape software (v3.10.2) to identify central targets. Molecular docking investigations were conducted using AutoDockTools 1.5.7, and normal mode analysis was performed on the iMODS server. The results indicated that 2.0 μg/mL of luteolin inhibited cell viability (83.66 % vs 100 %, P < 0.05); therefore, subsequent experiments utilized concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/mL. In comparison with the LPS model group, 0.5 and 1.0 μg/mL of luteolin enhanced cell viability (92.67 % vs 78.00 %, 97.00 % vs 78.00 %, P < 0.05) and SOD levels (18.00 U/mg vs 10.00 U/mg, 21.00 U/mg vs 10.00 U/mg, P < 0.05), while reducing apoptosis (15.00 % vs 29.00 %, 8.00 % vs 29.00 %, P < 0.05), MDA content (13.33 mmol/mg vs 20.00 mmol/mg, 10.50 mmol/mg vs 20.00 mmol/mg, P < 0.05), and ROS levels (27.50 % vs 41.50 %, 14.16 % vs 41.50 %, P < 0.05). No significant differences in these indices were observed with the treatment with 0.1 μg/mL of luteolin ( P > 0.05). Network pharmacology analysis identified 25 common targets for luteolin and IBD targets. These key targets were primarily associated with signaling pathways, such as the PI3K-AKT pathway, cancer, and cellular aging. Further, the results revealed a high binding affinity between luteolin and the AKT1 protein. The findings suggest that luteolin may exert its therapeutic effects on IBD by targeting AKT1 and modulating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress injury.","PeriodicalId":18059,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Drug Design & Discovery","volume":"22 11","pages":"100222-100222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Drug Design & Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lddd.2025.100222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the therapeutic mechanism of luteolin in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by integrating in vitro experiments, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and normal mode analysis. The impacts of luteolin on cell toxicity and survival were assessed by a CCK-8 assay using a LPS-induced HT-29 cell model of inflammation. Flow cytometry was utilized to analyze cell apoptosis. Levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were quantified using commercially available test kits, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected via flow cytometric analysis. Putative targets of luteolin were sourced from the ECTM and SuperPred databases, while genes related to IBD were acquired from the GeneCards database. Common genes between the candidate targets of luteolin and those associated with IBD were discerned by employing a Venn diagram. Subsequent functional enrichment analyses, covering both Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, were executed using the DAVID platform. A network of protein-protein interactions (PPI) was constructed with the STRING database and graphically represented in Cytoscape software (v3.10.2) to identify central targets. Molecular docking investigations were conducted using AutoDockTools 1.5.7, and normal mode analysis was performed on the iMODS server. The results indicated that 2.0 μg/mL of luteolin inhibited cell viability (83.66 % vs 100 %, P < 0.05); therefore, subsequent experiments utilized concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/mL. In comparison with the LPS model group, 0.5 and 1.0 μg/mL of luteolin enhanced cell viability (92.67 % vs 78.00 %, 97.00 % vs 78.00 %, P < 0.05) and SOD levels (18.00 U/mg vs 10.00 U/mg, 21.00 U/mg vs 10.00 U/mg, P < 0.05), while reducing apoptosis (15.00 % vs 29.00 %, 8.00 % vs 29.00 %, P < 0.05), MDA content (13.33 mmol/mg vs 20.00 mmol/mg, 10.50 mmol/mg vs 20.00 mmol/mg, P < 0.05), and ROS levels (27.50 % vs 41.50 %, 14.16 % vs 41.50 %, P < 0.05). No significant differences in these indices were observed with the treatment with 0.1 μg/mL of luteolin ( P > 0.05). Network pharmacology analysis identified 25 common targets for luteolin and IBD targets. These key targets were primarily associated with signaling pathways, such as the PI3K-AKT pathway, cancer, and cellular aging. Further, the results revealed a high binding affinity between luteolin and the AKT1 protein. The findings suggest that luteolin may exert its therapeutic effects on IBD by targeting AKT1 and modulating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress injury.
基于网络药理学、正态分析和实验验证探讨木犀草素治疗炎症性肠病的机制
本研究旨在通过体外实验、网络药理学、分子对接、正常模式分析等手段,探讨木犀草素在炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗中的作用机制。采用lps诱导的HT-29炎症细胞模型,采用CCK-8法评估木犀草素对细胞毒性和存活的影响。流式细胞术检测细胞凋亡。超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和丙二醛(MDA)水平用市售试剂盒定量,细胞内活性氧(ROS)通过流式细胞术分析检测。推测的木草素靶点来自ECTM和SuperPred数据库,而与IBD相关的基因来自GeneCards数据库。木犀草素候选靶点和与IBD相关的基因之间的共同基因通过使用维恩图来识别。随后的功能富集分析,包括基因本体(GO)术语和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径,使用DAVID平台执行。利用STRING数据库构建蛋白-蛋白相互作用(PPI)网络,并在Cytoscape软件(v3.10.2)中进行图形化表示,以确定中心靶点。使用AutoDockTools 1.5.7进行分子对接调查,在iMODS服务器上进行正态分析。结果表明,2.0 μg/mL木犀草素对细胞活力有抑制作用(83.66% vs 100%, P < 0.05);因此,后续实验采用0.1、0.5和1.0 μg/mL的浓度。与LPS模型组相比,0.5和1.0μg / mL的木樨草素增强细胞活力(92.67% vs 78.00%、97.00%和78.00%,P < 0.05), SOD水平(18.00 U / mg vs 10.00 U /毫克,21.00 U / mg vs 10.00 U /毫克,P < 0.05),同时减少细胞凋亡(15.00% vs 29.00%、8.00%和29.00%,P < 0.05), MDA含量(13.33更易毫克vs 20.00更易毫克,更易与10.50毫克vs 20.00更易毫克,P < 0.05),和ROS水平(27.50% vs 41.50%、14.16%和41.50%,P < 0.05)。0.1 μg/mL木犀草素处理对上述指标均无显著影响(P < 0.05)。网络药理学分析确定了25个木犀草素和IBD的共同靶点。这些关键靶点主要与信号通路相关,如PI3K-AKT通路、癌症和细胞衰老。此外,结果显示木犀草素与AKT1蛋白之间具有高结合亲和力。研究结果提示木犀草素可能通过靶向AKT1,调节PI3K-AKT信号通路,从而抑制氧化应激损伤,从而发挥对IBD的治疗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Letters in Drug Design & Discovery publishes letters, mini-reviews, highlights and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of rational drug design and discovery including medicinal chemistry, in-silico drug design, combinatorial chemistry, high-throughput screening, drug targets, and structure-activity relationships. The emphasis is on publishing quality papers very rapidly by taking full advantage of latest Internet technology for both submission and review of manuscripts. The online journal is an essential reading to all pharmaceutical scientists involved in research in drug design and discovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书