A Closer Look at Coaching: What do Coaches and Teachers do in the MyTeachingPartner Coaching Model?

Manuela Jimenez Herrera
{"title":"A Closer Look at Coaching: What do Coaches and Teachers do in the MyTeachingPartner Coaching Model?","authors":"Manuela Jimenez Herrera","doi":"10.18130/v3382r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present dissertation takes a multi-study approach to explore coaches’ and teachers’ behaviors in the implementation of a coaching intervention, MyTeachingPartner (Pianta et al., 2008), and their association with positive changes in teachers’ practice. Study 1 assesses coaches’ ability to provide objective and valid ratings of teacher-child interactions. Study 1 finds that coaches do provide valid ratings of teacher-child interactions that correspond well with observers’ ratings of teacher-child interactions. However, coaches also show a tendency to rate teachers with whom they have higher-quality relationships as showing higher-quality teacher-student interactions. Study 2 examines the variation in coaches’ implementation of MyTeachingPartner by looking at specific features of the model, the association between this variation and changes in teachers’ ability to analyze their interactions with children, their self-efficacy and their observed teaching practice, and the ways in which these associations outcomes vary as a function of teachers’ years of education and their level of observed practice at the beginning of the intervention. Findings indicate that although variation in coaches’ implementation is minimal, it was significantly associated with changes in teachers’ outcomes. Study 3 looks to the teacher’s side of the coaching dyad by examining how teachers analyze their practice during coaching conferences, as well as the degree of change in teachers’ analysis and its associations with teacher and classroom characteristics, and changes in practice during the process. Study 3 finds that although teachers engage in certain features of analysis, most teachers did not assess the effectiveness of their practice during the coaching conference, and teachers’ display of analysis remained stable across the coaching conferences. Teachers that analyze their practice more were also found to have less years of experience and to be teaching more challenging classrooms.","PeriodicalId":33824,"journal":{"name":"Radzynski Rocznik Humanistyczny","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radzynski Rocznik Humanistyczny","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18130/v3382r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present dissertation takes a multi-study approach to explore coaches’ and teachers’ behaviors in the implementation of a coaching intervention, MyTeachingPartner (Pianta et al., 2008), and their association with positive changes in teachers’ practice. Study 1 assesses coaches’ ability to provide objective and valid ratings of teacher-child interactions. Study 1 finds that coaches do provide valid ratings of teacher-child interactions that correspond well with observers’ ratings of teacher-child interactions. However, coaches also show a tendency to rate teachers with whom they have higher-quality relationships as showing higher-quality teacher-student interactions. Study 2 examines the variation in coaches’ implementation of MyTeachingPartner by looking at specific features of the model, the association between this variation and changes in teachers’ ability to analyze their interactions with children, their self-efficacy and their observed teaching practice, and the ways in which these associations outcomes vary as a function of teachers’ years of education and their level of observed practice at the beginning of the intervention. Findings indicate that although variation in coaches’ implementation is minimal, it was significantly associated with changes in teachers’ outcomes. Study 3 looks to the teacher’s side of the coaching dyad by examining how teachers analyze their practice during coaching conferences, as well as the degree of change in teachers’ analysis and its associations with teacher and classroom characteristics, and changes in practice during the process. Study 3 finds that although teachers engage in certain features of analysis, most teachers did not assess the effectiveness of their practice during the coaching conference, and teachers’ display of analysis remained stable across the coaching conferences. Teachers that analyze their practice more were also found to have less years of experience and to be teaching more challenging classrooms.
教练的近观:教练和老师在“我的教学伙伴”教练模式中做什么?
本论文采用多研究方法来探索教练和教师在实施教练干预MyTeachingPartner (Pianta et al., 2008)时的行为,以及它们与教师实践中积极变化的关系。研究1评估教练对师生互动提供客观有效评分的能力。研究1发现教练确实提供了有效的师生互动评级,与观察者对师生互动的评级很好地对应。然而,教练也倾向于评价与他们有更高质量关系的教师,因为他们表现出更高质量的师生互动。研究2考察了教练实施MyTeachingPartner的差异,通过观察模型的具体特征,这种差异与教师分析与儿童互动的能力、自我效能感和观察到的教学实践的变化之间的关联,以及这些关联结果作为教师受教育年限和干预开始时观察到的实践水平的函数的变化方式。研究结果表明,尽管教练实施的差异很小,但它与教师结果的变化显著相关。研究3通过考察教师如何在教练会议上分析他们的实践,以及教师分析的变化程度及其与教师和课堂特征的关联,以及在此过程中实践的变化,来关注教练二极体中的教师一方。研究3发现,尽管教师参与了一定的分析特征,但大多数教师在教练会期间没有评估其实践的有效性,并且教师在教练会期间的分析表现保持稳定。研究还发现,更多地分析实践的教师经验年限更短,教的课程更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书