A PCR-based assay for screening substrates for Aspergillus fumigatus for application in kiwi hatcheries

IF 0.7 4区 生物学 Q4 ORNITHOLOGY
Notornis Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.63172/129820gosmwr
S. Rowe, Matthew B. Stott, Bethany Brett, Manpreet K. Dhami
{"title":"A PCR-based assay for screening substrates for Aspergillus fumigatus for application in kiwi hatcheries","authors":"S. Rowe, Matthew B. Stott, Bethany Brett, Manpreet K. Dhami","doi":"10.63172/129820gosmwr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Captive facilities across New Zealand strive to mimic natural conditions for captive animals as closely as possible. In the case of the kiwi (Apteryx spp.), captive habitats are augmented with natural stimuli such as soils, leaf litter, bark, plants, logs, and mosses. Interaction with these introduced stimuli has been shown to encourage normal foraging behaviour and is speculated to aid in inoculating young animals with healthy microbial communities. However, introducing non-sterile natural stimuli into the captive environment also carries the risk of exposing kiwi to diseases such as aspergillosis, coccidiosis, and candidiasis. Aspergillosis is of particular concern to rearing facilities – the disease is most commonly attributed to exposure to Aspergillus fumigatus, an opportunistic fungal pathogen. Here we present a PCR-based screen to qualitatively detect the presence and/or absence of A. fumigatus in soils. Soil samples collected from nesting sites of rowi (Ōkārito brown kiwi, Apteryx rowi) in the Ōkārito region of the West Coast were screened for A. fumigatus using a species-specific primer set coupled with a basic DNA extraction. Willowbank Wildlife Reserve soil and substrate samples were also screened as a baseline comparison representing captive rearing facilities. Results from the assays showed that the extraction technique was effective at isolating A. fumigatus DNA at detectable levels from a variety of soils, and that Ōkārito soils did not harbour a higher abundance of A. fumigatus than those found at Willowbank. This preliminary screening method could be used by facilities in New Zealand to quickly and cheaply screen soils and substrates for A. fumigatus before introducing them to captive enclosures.","PeriodicalId":56046,"journal":{"name":"Notornis","volume":"70 1","pages":"31-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notornis","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.63172/129820gosmwr","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Captive facilities across New Zealand strive to mimic natural conditions for captive animals as closely as possible. In the case of the kiwi (Apteryx spp.), captive habitats are augmented with natural stimuli such as soils, leaf litter, bark, plants, logs, and mosses. Interaction with these introduced stimuli has been shown to encourage normal foraging behaviour and is speculated to aid in inoculating young animals with healthy microbial communities. However, introducing non-sterile natural stimuli into the captive environment also carries the risk of exposing kiwi to diseases such as aspergillosis, coccidiosis, and candidiasis. Aspergillosis is of particular concern to rearing facilities – the disease is most commonly attributed to exposure to Aspergillus fumigatus, an opportunistic fungal pathogen. Here we present a PCR-based screen to qualitatively detect the presence and/or absence of A. fumigatus in soils. Soil samples collected from nesting sites of rowi (Ōkārito brown kiwi, Apteryx rowi) in the Ōkārito region of the West Coast were screened for A. fumigatus using a species-specific primer set coupled with a basic DNA extraction. Willowbank Wildlife Reserve soil and substrate samples were also screened as a baseline comparison representing captive rearing facilities. Results from the assays showed that the extraction technique was effective at isolating A. fumigatus DNA at detectable levels from a variety of soils, and that Ōkārito soils did not harbour a higher abundance of A. fumigatus than those found at Willowbank. This preliminary screening method could be used by facilities in New Zealand to quickly and cheaply screen soils and substrates for A. fumigatus before introducing them to captive enclosures.
基于pcr的烟曲霉底物筛选方法在猕猴桃孵化场中的应用
新西兰各地的圈养设施都在努力尽可能地模仿圈养动物的自然条件。以几维鸟(Apteryx spp.)为例,圈养栖息地增加了自然刺激,如土壤、落叶、树皮、植物、原木和苔藓。与这些引入的刺激的相互作用已被证明可以促进正常的觅食行为,并被推测有助于给幼龄动物接种健康的微生物群落。然而,将非无菌的自然刺激引入圈养环境也有使猕猴桃暴露于曲霉病、球虫病和念珠菌病等疾病的风险。曲霉病是饲养设施特别关注的问题——该疾病最常见的原因是接触了烟曲霉,这是一种机会性真菌病原体。在这里,我们提出了一个基于pcr的筛选来定性检测土壤中烟曲霉的存在和/或不存在。在美国西海岸Ōkārito地区的褐猕猴鸟(Ōkārito brown kiwi, Apteryx rowi)筑巢地采集土壤样本,利用一种物种特异性引物组合和基本DNA提取技术对烟熏伊蚊(a . fumigatus)进行筛选。Willowbank野生动物保护区的土壤和基质样品也被筛选作为圈养饲养设施的基线比较。结果表明,该提取技术可有效地从多种土壤中分离出可检测水平的烟曲霉DNA,并且Ōkārito土壤中烟曲霉的丰度并不高于Willowbank土壤。这种初步筛选方法可用于新西兰设施在将烟曲霉引入圈养围栏之前快速廉价地筛选土壤和基质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Notornis
Notornis Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书