EESB-FDO: enhancing the fitness-dependent optimizer through a modified boundary handling mechanism

IF 2 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Aram Kamal Faraj, Aso M. Aladdin, Azad A. Ameen
{"title":"EESB-FDO: enhancing the fitness-dependent optimizer through a modified boundary handling mechanism","authors":"Aram Kamal Faraj, Aso M. Aladdin, Azad A. Ameen","doi":"10.3389/fams.2025.1640044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fitness-dependent optimizer (FDO) has recently gained attention as an effective metaheuristic for solving different optimization problems. However, it faces limitations in exploitation and convergence speed. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces two enhanced variants: enhancing exploitation through stochastic boundary for FDO (EESB-FDO) and enhancing exploitation through boundary carving for FDO (EEBC-FDO). In addition, the ELFS strategy is proposed to constrain Levy flight steps, ensuring more stable exploration. Experimental results show that these modifications significantly improve the performance of FDO compared to the original version. To evaluate the performance of the EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO, three primary categories of benchmark test functions were utilized: classical, CEC 2019, and CEC 2022. The assessment was further supported by the application of statistical analysis methods to ensure a comprehensive and rigorous performance evaluation. The performance of the proposed EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO algorithms was evaluated through comparative analysis with several existing FDO modifications, as well as with other well-established metaheuristic algorithms, including the Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA), the Learner Performance-Based Behavior Algorithm (LPB), the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and the Fox-inspired Optimization Algorithm (FOX). The statistical analysis indicated that both EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO exhibit better performance compared to the aforementioned algorithms. Furthermore, a final evaluation involved applying EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO to four real-world optimization problems: the gear train design problem, the three-bar truss problem, the pathological igg fraction in the nervous system, and the integrated cyber-physical attack on a manufacturing system. The results demonstrate that both proposed variants significantly outperform both the FDO and the modified fitness-dependent optimizer (MFDO) in solving these complex problems.","PeriodicalId":36662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/applied-mathematics-and-statistics/articles/10.3389/fams.2025.1640044/pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2025.1640044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fitness-dependent optimizer (FDO) has recently gained attention as an effective metaheuristic for solving different optimization problems. However, it faces limitations in exploitation and convergence speed. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces two enhanced variants: enhancing exploitation through stochastic boundary for FDO (EESB-FDO) and enhancing exploitation through boundary carving for FDO (EEBC-FDO). In addition, the ELFS strategy is proposed to constrain Levy flight steps, ensuring more stable exploration. Experimental results show that these modifications significantly improve the performance of FDO compared to the original version. To evaluate the performance of the EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO, three primary categories of benchmark test functions were utilized: classical, CEC 2019, and CEC 2022. The assessment was further supported by the application of statistical analysis methods to ensure a comprehensive and rigorous performance evaluation. The performance of the proposed EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO algorithms was evaluated through comparative analysis with several existing FDO modifications, as well as with other well-established metaheuristic algorithms, including the Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA), the Learner Performance-Based Behavior Algorithm (LPB), the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and the Fox-inspired Optimization Algorithm (FOX). The statistical analysis indicated that both EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO exhibit better performance compared to the aforementioned algorithms. Furthermore, a final evaluation involved applying EESB-FDO and EEBC-FDO to four real-world optimization problems: the gear train design problem, the three-bar truss problem, the pathological igg fraction in the nervous system, and the integrated cyber-physical attack on a manufacturing system. The results demonstrate that both proposed variants significantly outperform both the FDO and the modified fitness-dependent optimizer (MFDO) in solving these complex problems.
EESB-FDO:通过修改的边界处理机制增强与适应度相关的优化器
适应度相关优化器(FDO)作为一种有效的元启发式算法,近年来得到了广泛的关注。然而,它在开发和收敛速度方面存在局限性。为了克服这些挑战,本研究引入了两种增强变体:通过随机边界增强FDO开发(EESB-FDO)和通过边界雕刻增强FDO开发(EEBC-FDO)。此外,提出了ELFS策略来限制Levy飞行步骤,确保更稳定的勘探。实验结果表明,与原始版本相比,这些改进显著提高了FDO的性能。为了评估EESB-FDO和EEBC-FDO的性能,我们使用了三大类基准测试函数:classic、CEC 2019和CEC 2022。评估工作还采用了统计分析方法,以确保进行全面和严格的绩效评估。通过与几种现有的FDO修改以及其他成熟的元启发式算法(包括算数优化算法(AOA)、基于学习者性能的行为算法(LPB)、鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)和FOX -inspired Optimization Algorithm (FOX))的比较分析,评估了所提出的eeb -FDO和EEBC-FDO算法的性能。统计分析表明,与上述算法相比,EESB-FDO和EEBC-FDO都表现出更好的性能。此外,最后的评估涉及将EESB-FDO和EEBC-FDO应用于四个现实世界的优化问题:齿轮系设计问题、三杆桁架问题、神经系统中的病理igg分数以及制造系统的综合网络物理攻击。结果表明,这两种变体在解决这些复杂问题时都明显优于FDO和改进适应度相关优化器(MFDO)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
117
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书