Learning from safeguarding adults for Transitional Safeguarding practice

IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Christine Cocker, Dez Holmes, Adi Cooper
{"title":"Learning from safeguarding adults for Transitional Safeguarding practice","authors":"Christine Cocker, Dez Holmes, Adi Cooper","doi":"10.56687/9781447365587-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 explores learning from adult safeguarding provision, which is very different to children's safeguarding. Adult safeguarding enquiry processes apply where adults have care and support needs and are unable to protect themselves because of those needs. For some young people, who have had safeguarding support as children, this can mean that there is a 'cliff edge' when they become 18 because they are not considered to have care and support needs, or because these are not deemed to prevent them being able to protect themselves. Despite the enabling preventative powers of the Care Act 2014 and underpinning 'well-being' principle, lack of legal literacy, pressures on services, and limited resources and capacity can all serve to limit the support offer to young people. MSP is the key approach that underpins adult safeguarding practice. It prioritises the involvement of the person in identifying their outcomes and focuses on what they want to achieve to be safe. MSP provides a way of working with young adults that can adapt to their personal developmental needs, ensures their active participation, and provides an inclusive safeguarding response. It is aligned to the principles of Transitional Safeguarding and can be 'drawn down' to use as an approach to safeguard young people aged 16-plus who are able to evaluate the risks that they face in their lives.","PeriodicalId":47631,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Politics","volume":"1 1","pages":"124-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447365587-010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 6 explores learning from adult safeguarding provision, which is very different to children's safeguarding. Adult safeguarding enquiry processes apply where adults have care and support needs and are unable to protect themselves because of those needs. For some young people, who have had safeguarding support as children, this can mean that there is a 'cliff edge' when they become 18 because they are not considered to have care and support needs, or because these are not deemed to prevent them being able to protect themselves. Despite the enabling preventative powers of the Care Act 2014 and underpinning 'well-being' principle, lack of legal literacy, pressures on services, and limited resources and capacity can all serve to limit the support offer to young people. MSP is the key approach that underpins adult safeguarding practice. It prioritises the involvement of the person in identifying their outcomes and focuses on what they want to achieve to be safe. MSP provides a way of working with young adults that can adapt to their personal developmental needs, ensures their active participation, and provides an inclusive safeguarding response. It is aligned to the principles of Transitional Safeguarding and can be 'drawn down' to use as an approach to safeguard young people aged 16-plus who are able to evaluate the risks that they face in their lives.
从过渡时期保护成人的实践中学习
第六章探讨了成人保障的学习,这与儿童保障有很大的不同。成人保护咨询程序适用于成年人有照顾和支持需要,而由于这些需要而无法保护自己的情况。对于一些从小就得到保护支持的年轻人来说,这可能意味着当他们18岁的时候会有一个“悬崖边缘”,因为他们不被认为有照顾和支持的需求,或者因为这些不被认为是阻止他们保护自己的能力。尽管《2014年关爱法案》(Care Act 2014)具有预防性的力量,并支持“福祉”原则,但缺乏法律知识、服务压力以及有限的资源和能力,都可能限制向年轻人提供的支持。MSP是支撑成人保护实践的关键方法。它优先考虑人们在确定他们的结果时的参与,并关注他们想要实现的安全。MSP提供了一种与年轻人一起工作的方式,可以适应他们的个人发展需求,确保他们的积极参与,并提供包容性的保障回应。它与过渡性保障原则相一致,可以“缩减”,作为一种方法来保护16岁以上的年轻人,他们能够评估他们在生活中面临的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书