Cultural and Socioeconomic Influences on Medicine Choice: A Comparative Review of Herbal and Pharmaceutical Drug Preferences

Ahmad Yani
{"title":"Cultural and Socioeconomic Influences on Medicine Choice: A Comparative Review of Herbal and Pharmaceutical Drug Preferences","authors":"Ahmad Yani","doi":"10.61194/jrkpk.v3i1.677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational stress among healthcare workers has become an urgent global concern, exacerbated by increased workloads, insufficient institutional support, and poor working conditions. This study aims to examine the primary stressors affecting medical professionals and evaluate existing interventions. A systematic review of peer reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was conducted, focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed empirical research on healthcare worker stress, while non English, non peer reviewed, and non empirical studies were excluded. The findings indicate that excessive workload, lack of workplace support, and emotional distress are major contributors to stress. High intensity settings such as intensive care units (ICUs) exhibit greater stress levels than primary care facilities. Healthcare workers in low resource environments experience disproportionately higher stress due to limited infrastructure and inadequate psychological support. Effective coping mechanisms include peer support, humor, and institutional interventions such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs). Digital mental health solutions and policy driven interventions have proven beneficial in reducing occupational stress. The study concludes that structured institutional support, mental health training, and flexible work policies are essential in mitigating stress among healthcare professionals. Further research should explore long term stress impacts and evaluate innovative interventions to improve workforce resilience and patient care quality.","PeriodicalId":509416,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Kualitatif dan Promosi Kesehatan","volume":"3 1","pages":"50-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://journal.sinergi.or.id/index.php/jrkpk/article/download/677/528","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Kualitatif dan Promosi Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61194/jrkpk.v3i1.677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational stress among healthcare workers has become an urgent global concern, exacerbated by increased workloads, insufficient institutional support, and poor working conditions. This study aims to examine the primary stressors affecting medical professionals and evaluate existing interventions. A systematic review of peer reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was conducted, focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed empirical research on healthcare worker stress, while non English, non peer reviewed, and non empirical studies were excluded. The findings indicate that excessive workload, lack of workplace support, and emotional distress are major contributors to stress. High intensity settings such as intensive care units (ICUs) exhibit greater stress levels than primary care facilities. Healthcare workers in low resource environments experience disproportionately higher stress due to limited infrastructure and inadequate psychological support. Effective coping mechanisms include peer support, humor, and institutional interventions such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs). Digital mental health solutions and policy driven interventions have proven beneficial in reducing occupational stress. The study concludes that structured institutional support, mental health training, and flexible work policies are essential in mitigating stress among healthcare professionals. Further research should explore long term stress impacts and evaluate innovative interventions to improve workforce resilience and patient care quality.
文化和社会经济对药物选择的影响:草药和药物偏好的比较回顾
卫生保健工作者的职业压力已成为全球迫切关注的问题,工作量增加、机构支持不足和工作条件恶劣加剧了这一问题。本研究旨在探讨影响医疗专业人员的主要压力源,并评估现有的干预措施。对PubMed、Scopus、b谷歌Scholar和Cochrane图书馆的同行评议文献进行了系统综述,重点关注2019年至2024年间发表的研究。纳入标准包括对医护人员压力的实证研究,而非英语、非同行评审和非实证研究被排除在外。研究结果表明,过度的工作量、缺乏工作场所的支持和情绪困扰是造成压力的主要原因。高强度环境,如重症监护病房(icu)比初级保健设施表现出更大的压力水平。由于基础设施有限和心理支持不足,资源匮乏环境中的卫生保健工作者承受着不成比例的更大压力。有效的应对机制包括同伴支持、幽默和机构干预,如员工援助计划(EAPs)。事实证明,数字心理健康解决方案和政策驱动的干预措施有助于减轻职业压力。该研究得出结论,结构化的机构支持、心理健康培训和灵活的工作政策对于减轻医疗保健专业人员的压力至关重要。进一步的研究应探讨长期压力的影响,并评估创新的干预措施,以提高劳动力弹性和病人护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书