Maximizing the detection probabilities of dusky grouse for population monitoring

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Elizabeth A. Leipold, Claire N. Gower, Lance B. McNew
{"title":"Maximizing the detection probabilities of dusky grouse for population monitoring","authors":"Elizabeth A. Leipold, Claire N. Gower, Lance B. McNew","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its status as a game species in the western USA, rigorous monitoring of dusky grouse Dendragapus obscurus populations is limited. Obtaining an adequate number of observations for effective population monitoring of dusky grouse is challenging due to difficult‐to‐reach montane habitats, cryptic behaviors, and limited personnel, time, and funds at conservation agencies. While habitat accessibility and survey effort constraints may be outside a manager's control, identifying the most effective protocols to better detect a target species is possible and will improve monitoring programs. Our objectives were to 1) evaluate field‐based protocols for maximizing dusky grouse detections and 2) identify survey conditions and timing that maximize the probability of detecting dusky grouse in western Montana. We conducted replicated point‐count surveys with and without electronic playback of grouse calls in spring and summer 2019, and spring surveys solely with electronic playback in 2020–2021. We used N‐mixture models to compare the probability of detecting dusky grouse in spring versus summer sampling and evaluate the effects of electronic playback of grouse calls, route type (off‐trail, trail, and road), weather, background noise, day, and time on probability of detection. Spring sampling yielded substantially more dusky grouse detections than summer sampling. The use of electronic playback of female sooty grouse calls in the spring increased detection probability but dusky grouse chick distress calls during the summer did not improve detection rates. The probability of detecting a dusky grouse was similar across the different route types (off‐trail, trail, and road), and maximized on clear days, with little wind and background noise, with surveys occurring 9–162 min post‐sunrise during 3–23 May. By examining the effects of different factors on dusky grouse probability of detection, our results provide necessary information for the development of effective protocols for field surveys for population monitoring of dusky grouse.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/wlb3.01411","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite its status as a game species in the western USA, rigorous monitoring of dusky grouse Dendragapus obscurus populations is limited. Obtaining an adequate number of observations for effective population monitoring of dusky grouse is challenging due to difficult‐to‐reach montane habitats, cryptic behaviors, and limited personnel, time, and funds at conservation agencies. While habitat accessibility and survey effort constraints may be outside a manager's control, identifying the most effective protocols to better detect a target species is possible and will improve monitoring programs. Our objectives were to 1) evaluate field‐based protocols for maximizing dusky grouse detections and 2) identify survey conditions and timing that maximize the probability of detecting dusky grouse in western Montana. We conducted replicated point‐count surveys with and without electronic playback of grouse calls in spring and summer 2019, and spring surveys solely with electronic playback in 2020–2021. We used N‐mixture models to compare the probability of detecting dusky grouse in spring versus summer sampling and evaluate the effects of electronic playback of grouse calls, route type (off‐trail, trail, and road), weather, background noise, day, and time on probability of detection. Spring sampling yielded substantially more dusky grouse detections than summer sampling. The use of electronic playback of female sooty grouse calls in the spring increased detection probability but dusky grouse chick distress calls during the summer did not improve detection rates. The probability of detecting a dusky grouse was similar across the different route types (off‐trail, trail, and road), and maximized on clear days, with little wind and background noise, with surveys occurring 9–162 min post‐sunrise during 3–23 May. By examining the effects of different factors on dusky grouse probability of detection, our results provide necessary information for the development of effective protocols for field surveys for population monitoring of dusky grouse.
最大化黑松鸡种群监测的检测概率
尽管它在美国西部是一种狩猎物种,但对黑松鸡种群的严格监测是有限的。由于难以到达山区栖息地,行为隐秘,以及保护机构人员、时间和资金有限,获得足够数量的观察结果以有效监测黑松鸡的种群是具有挑战性的。虽然栖息地的可达性和调查工作的限制可能不在管理者的控制范围之内,但确定最有效的方案来更好地检测目标物种是可能的,并将改善监测计划。我们的目标是1)评估最大限度地检测黑松鸡的野外方案,2)确定在蒙大拿州西部最大限度地检测黑松鸡的调查条件和时间。我们在2019年春季和夏季进行了有和没有松鸡叫声电子回放的重复点计数调查,并在2020-2021年进行了仅有电子回放的春季调查。我们使用N - mix模型来比较春季和夏季取样检测到黑松鸡的概率,并评估松鸡叫声的电子回放、路线类型(非小路、小路和公路)、天气、背景噪声、天数和时间对检测概率的影响。春季取样比夏季取样检测到更多的黑松鸡。在春季使用电子回放雌性黑松鸡的叫声增加了检出率,而在夏季使用黑松鸡雏鸟的求救叫声并没有提高检出率。在不同的路线类型(小路、小径和公路)中,发现黑松鸡的概率相似,在晴朗的日子里最大,风和背景噪音小,调查发生在5月3日至23日日出后9-162分钟。通过考察不同因素对黑松鸡检出率的影响,为制定有效的黑松鸡种群监测野外调查方案提供了必要的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书