{"title":"Toward a memorial ethics of hope? Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum","authors":"Arleen Ionescu","doi":"10.1177/17506980251359580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking further Ann Rigney’s urge to expand her case study on memories of hope, this article investigates the positive turn in memory studies by focusing on Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum as a memorial ethics of hope yet pointing out the museum politics that prevents it from achieving its aim. After defining the concept of memorial ethics of hope, the next sections look into the Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum’s exhibiting strategies and tropes: first, how the narrative of the museum testifies to the alterity of the Other and the responsibility of those who offered the Jewish refugees the hope of living, and second, the way in which several artifacts that are generally associated in Holocaust museums with metonymies of death were re-semanticized in Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum as objects/memories of hope. The final section shows that the Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum’s reinterpretation of painful memories as memories of hope remains unconvincing to most Western visitors.","PeriodicalId":47104,"journal":{"name":"Memory Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980251359580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Taking further Ann Rigney’s urge to expand her case study on memories of hope, this article investigates the positive turn in memory studies by focusing on Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum as a memorial ethics of hope yet pointing out the museum politics that prevents it from achieving its aim. After defining the concept of memorial ethics of hope, the next sections look into the Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum’s exhibiting strategies and tropes: first, how the narrative of the museum testifies to the alterity of the Other and the responsibility of those who offered the Jewish refugees the hope of living, and second, the way in which several artifacts that are generally associated in Holocaust museums with metonymies of death were re-semanticized in Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum as objects/memories of hope. The final section shows that the Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum’s reinterpretation of painful memories as memories of hope remains unconvincing to most Western visitors.
期刊介绍:
Memory Studies is an international peer reviewed journal. Memory Studies affords recognition, form, and direction to work in this nascent field, and provides a critical forum for dialogue and debate on the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues central to a collaborative understanding of memory today. Memory Studies examines the social, cultural, cognitive, political and technological shifts affecting how, what and why individuals, groups and societies remember, and forget. The journal responds to and seeks to shape public and academic discourse on the nature, manipulation, and contestation of memory in the contemporary era.