Ethical Processes and Dilemmas during Research with Youth on Cyber-Risk

IF 0.7 Q3 Social Sciences
Jay Cavanagh, Michael Adorjan, Rosemary Ricciardelli
{"title":"Ethical Processes and Dilemmas during Research with Youth on Cyber-Risk","authors":"Jay Cavanagh, Michael Adorjan, Rosemary Ricciardelli","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.21.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we reflect on the ethical processes and dilemmas we encountered in almost a decade of qualitative research with teenagers about digital technologies and cyber-risk. Our research underscores both the opportunities and challenges of teenagers’ engagements with digital technologies, including cyberbullying and image-based sexual harassment and abuse (i.e., non-consensual sexting), on popular social media platforms. Our current research explores teenagers’ experiences with cyber-risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, including managing homeschooling (due to lockdowns), online addiction, mental health challenges, and encounters with disinformation and misinformation. We discuss our experiences with focus group facilitation and one-to-one semi-structured interviews, specifically our reflections on ethical processes encountered in the field, such as fostering rapport with young participants given the significant age gaps and our lack of knowledge at times, regarding digital technologies or topics like image-based sexual abuse. We also discuss our experiences conducting research with teenagers under the new capacity to consent ethical framework, which positions children and youth as often having agency to consent to research independently from their parents or legal guardians. Here, we detail reflections on navigating a new approach and highlight some of the considerations arising from ascertaining assent and consent. Centralizing issues of developing rapport, trust, and ethical processes related to interactional dynamics during interviews, the paper provides insights and possible strategies for those conducting research with children and youth.","PeriodicalId":53708,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Sociology Review","volume":"21 3","pages":"48-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/qualit/article/download/27437/27063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.21.3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we reflect on the ethical processes and dilemmas we encountered in almost a decade of qualitative research with teenagers about digital technologies and cyber-risk. Our research underscores both the opportunities and challenges of teenagers’ engagements with digital technologies, including cyberbullying and image-based sexual harassment and abuse (i.e., non-consensual sexting), on popular social media platforms. Our current research explores teenagers’ experiences with cyber-risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, including managing homeschooling (due to lockdowns), online addiction, mental health challenges, and encounters with disinformation and misinformation. We discuss our experiences with focus group facilitation and one-to-one semi-structured interviews, specifically our reflections on ethical processes encountered in the field, such as fostering rapport with young participants given the significant age gaps and our lack of knowledge at times, regarding digital technologies or topics like image-based sexual abuse. We also discuss our experiences conducting research with teenagers under the new capacity to consent ethical framework, which positions children and youth as often having agency to consent to research independently from their parents or legal guardians. Here, we detail reflections on navigating a new approach and highlight some of the considerations arising from ascertaining assent and consent. Centralizing issues of developing rapport, trust, and ethical processes related to interactional dynamics during interviews, the paper provides insights and possible strategies for those conducting research with children and youth.
青少年网络风险研究中的伦理过程与困境
在这篇文章中,我们反思了近十年来我们对青少年关于数字技术和网络风险的定性研究中遇到的伦理过程和困境。我们的研究强调了青少年参与数字技术的机遇和挑战,包括网络欺凌和基于图像的性骚扰和虐待(即,未经同意的性短信),在流行的社交媒体平台上。我们目前的研究探讨了青少年在COVID-19大流行期间面临网络风险的经历,包括管理在家上学(由于封锁)、网瘾、心理健康挑战以及遇到虚假信息和错误信息。我们讨论了我们在焦点小组指导和一对一半结构化访谈方面的经验,特别是我们对在该领域遇到的道德过程的思考,例如在数字技术或基于图像的性虐待等话题上,鉴于年龄差距很大,我们有时缺乏知识,如何培养与年轻参与者的关系。我们还讨论了我们在新的同意能力伦理框架下与青少年进行研究的经验,该框架使儿童和青少年经常拥有独立于父母或法定监护人同意研究的机构。在这里,我们详细介绍了对导航新方法的思考,并强调了确定同意和同意所引起的一些考虑。本文集中讨论了在访谈过程中与互动动态相关的发展融洽关系、信任和道德过程的问题,为那些进行儿童和青少年研究的人提供了见解和可能的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qualitative Sociology Review
Qualitative Sociology Review Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: For a long time, we have observed an increased interest in qualitative sociology, and the use of an interpretive frame to understand human actions, social processes, meanings and definitions, and new social theory generally. In order to enable a free flow of information and to integrate the community of qualitative sociologists, we have decided to create an open-access, international scientific journal. Qualitative Sociology Review publishes empirical, theoretical and methodological articles applicable to all fields and specializations within sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书