Au Contact: French Infantry Tactics in the Maginot Line Advance Posts During the Phoney War, 4 September 1939 to 10 May 1940

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY
Kevin Passmore
{"title":"Au Contact: French Infantry Tactics in the Maginot Line Advance Posts During the Phoney War, 4 September 1939 to 10 May 1940","authors":"Kevin Passmore","doi":"10.1177/09683445251329056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historians’ preoccupation with explaining why France lost the Battle of France in May and June 1940 obscures worthwhile histories that are not relevant to the outcome. Generalisation from the battle on the Meuse, where elite German units faced poor French forces, exaggerates the superiority of German troops’ mission-oriented tactics relative to the top-down ‘methodical’ tactics of the French. This article shows that French infantry tactics were the object of permanent politicised controversy, and that in the course of patrolling and skirmishing in the no-man’s-land between French and German fortifications, the French substantially modified their tactics and organisation.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09683445251329056","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445251329056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Historians’ preoccupation with explaining why France lost the Battle of France in May and June 1940 obscures worthwhile histories that are not relevant to the outcome. Generalisation from the battle on the Meuse, where elite German units faced poor French forces, exaggerates the superiority of German troops’ mission-oriented tactics relative to the top-down ‘methodical’ tactics of the French. This article shows that French infantry tactics were the object of permanent politicised controversy, and that in the course of patrolling and skirmishing in the no-man’s-land between French and German fortifications, the French substantially modified their tactics and organisation.
《接触:假战争期间马其诺防线前哨的法军步兵战术》,1939年9月4日至1940年5月10日
历史学家专注于解释为什么法国在1940年5月和6月输掉了法兰西战役,这掩盖了与结果无关的有价值的历史。在默兹河战役中,精锐的德国部队面对孱弱的法军,由此得出的结论夸大了德军以任务为导向的战术相对于法军自上而下的“系统”战术的优势。本文认为,法军的步兵战术一直是政治争论的对象,在法军和德军工事之间的无人区巡逻和小规模战斗中,法军对其战术和组织进行了实质性的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
War in History
War in History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书