Educational programmes improving nurses' ethical competence: A scoping review.

IF 3.8 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-12 DOI:10.1177/09697330251403137
Farzaneh Mohamadnezhad, Mahin Gheibizadeh, Neda Sayadi, Alireza Irajpour, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Morteza Nasiri
{"title":"Educational programmes improving nurses' ethical competence: A scoping review.","authors":"Farzaneh Mohamadnezhad, Mahin Gheibizadeh, Neda Sayadi, Alireza Irajpour, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Morteza Nasiri","doi":"10.1177/09697330251403137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhancing ethical competence in nursing has become a crucial educational focus due to growing ethical challenges in clinical settings. However, systematic knowledge about the design and impact of relevant educational programs remains limited. This scoping review seeks to address that gap by examining the scope, variety, and characteristics of such programs, highlighting their educational strategies and content, and proposing directions for future research to inform more effective ethical competence development in nursing. The review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed across five international databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar between 2000 and 2024. Of 25,868 initial sources, 35 studies were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed four main educational approaches utilized: e-learning, simulation and role-playing, group discussions, and traditional lectures. Ethical content focused on fundamental ethical principles, professional codes, ethical reasoning, and ethical challenges. Although most studies reported improvements in ethical sensitivity or ethical decision-making, significant gaps persist in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the effectiveness of these programs. While ethics education can facilitate ethical development in nurses, the absence of standardized evaluations and evidence-based frameworks limits the generalizability of findings. This review outlines the current state of ethics education in nursing, highlighting the crucial need for future research to develop robust, culturally appropriate, and evidence-based programs that truly enhance nurses' ethical competence. All stages of this review adhered to valid scientific research principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1796-1816"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251403137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing ethical competence in nursing has become a crucial educational focus due to growing ethical challenges in clinical settings. However, systematic knowledge about the design and impact of relevant educational programs remains limited. This scoping review seeks to address that gap by examining the scope, variety, and characteristics of such programs, highlighting their educational strategies and content, and proposing directions for future research to inform more effective ethical competence development in nursing. The review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed across five international databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar between 2000 and 2024. Of 25,868 initial sources, 35 studies were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed four main educational approaches utilized: e-learning, simulation and role-playing, group discussions, and traditional lectures. Ethical content focused on fundamental ethical principles, professional codes, ethical reasoning, and ethical challenges. Although most studies reported improvements in ethical sensitivity or ethical decision-making, significant gaps persist in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the effectiveness of these programs. While ethics education can facilitate ethical development in nurses, the absence of standardized evaluations and evidence-based frameworks limits the generalizability of findings. This review outlines the current state of ethics education in nursing, highlighting the crucial need for future research to develop robust, culturally appropriate, and evidence-based programs that truly enhance nurses' ethical competence. All stages of this review adhered to valid scientific research principles.

提高护士道德能力的教育计划:范围审查。
由于临床环境中日益增长的伦理挑战,提高护理伦理能力已成为一个至关重要的教育重点。然而,有关相关教育计划的设计和影响的系统知识仍然有限。本综述旨在通过检查此类项目的范围、种类和特征,突出其教育策略和内容,并为未来的研究提出方向,以提供更有效的护理伦理能力发展信息,从而解决这一差距。评估使用Arksey和O'Malley框架进行,并根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。在2000年至2024年间,对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE、谷歌Scholar等5个国际数据库进行了系统检索。在25,868个初始来源中,选择了35个研究进行最终分析。调查结果揭示了四种主要的教育方法:电子学习、模拟和角色扮演、小组讨论和传统讲座。伦理内容侧重于基本的伦理原则、职业准则、伦理推理和伦理挑战。尽管大多数研究报告了伦理敏感性或伦理决策方面的改进,但在这些项目的设计、实施和有效性评估方面仍存在重大差距。虽然道德教育可以促进护士的道德发展,但缺乏标准化的评估和基于证据的框架限制了研究结果的普遍性。这篇综述概述了护理伦理教育的现状,强调了未来研究的关键需求,即开发强大的、文化上合适的、以证据为基础的项目,真正提高护士的伦理能力。本综述的所有阶段均遵循有效的科学研究原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书