Stakeholder engagement in implementation research: a qualitative study of VA implementation scientist perspectives.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Karissa M Fenwick, Elizabeth M Yano, Susan M Frayne, Alison B Hamilton
{"title":"Stakeholder engagement in implementation research: a qualitative study of VA implementation scientist perspectives.","authors":"Karissa M Fenwick, Elizabeth M Yano, Susan M Frayne, Alison B Hamilton","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibag022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stakeholder engagement improves the quality, clinical relevance, and contextual fit of healthcare interventions. However, there is limited work characterizing how researchers approach stakeholder engagement in practice, and which organizational supports they most value.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to describe how experienced researchers engaged multilevel stakeholders in implementation studies, and the benefits, challenges, and needs they encountered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system researchers with histories of stakeholder-engaged implementation research through a combination of literature review and snowball sampling. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 28 participants in 2016. Two research team members analyzed interview data using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described how multilevel stakeholder input substantively improved their research. Common engagement approaches varied in intensity and included interviews and focus groups, advisory committees, and stakeholder membership on research teams. Although participants expressed a desire-even a moral imperative-to increase stakeholder engagement, their efforts were limited by organizational constraints. Participants suggested that VA can support stakeholder engagement in research by reconceptualizing funding mechanisms, providing resources, and fostering an organizational culture that aligns with engagement principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experienced researchers perceived multilevel stakeholder engagement as both critical for implementation research and difficult to achieve. Findings highlight that stakeholder engagement is shaped not only by researcher commitment and skill but also by organizational constraints, incentives, and power structures. Results offer actionable suggestions for improving alignment between engagement activities, professional incentives, and organizational infrastructure that may strengthen stakeholder-engaged implementation research in VA and other healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibag022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stakeholder engagement improves the quality, clinical relevance, and contextual fit of healthcare interventions. However, there is limited work characterizing how researchers approach stakeholder engagement in practice, and which organizational supports they most value.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to describe how experienced researchers engaged multilevel stakeholders in implementation studies, and the benefits, challenges, and needs they encountered.

Methods: We identified Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system researchers with histories of stakeholder-engaged implementation research through a combination of literature review and snowball sampling. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 28 participants in 2016. Two research team members analyzed interview data using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

Results: Participants described how multilevel stakeholder input substantively improved their research. Common engagement approaches varied in intensity and included interviews and focus groups, advisory committees, and stakeholder membership on research teams. Although participants expressed a desire-even a moral imperative-to increase stakeholder engagement, their efforts were limited by organizational constraints. Participants suggested that VA can support stakeholder engagement in research by reconceptualizing funding mechanisms, providing resources, and fostering an organizational culture that aligns with engagement principles.

Conclusions: Experienced researchers perceived multilevel stakeholder engagement as both critical for implementation research and difficult to achieve. Findings highlight that stakeholder engagement is shaped not only by researcher commitment and skill but also by organizational constraints, incentives, and power structures. Results offer actionable suggestions for improving alignment between engagement activities, professional incentives, and organizational infrastructure that may strengthen stakeholder-engaged implementation research in VA and other healthcare settings.

利益相关者参与实施研究:对VA实施科学家视角的定性研究。
背景:利益相关者参与可提高医疗干预的质量、临床相关性和情境契合度。然而,研究人员在实践中如何处理利益相关者的参与,以及他们最重视哪个组织的支持,这些工作都是有限的。目的:本研究的目的是描述经验丰富的研究人员如何在实施研究中涉及多层次利益相关者,以及他们遇到的好处、挑战和需求。方法:通过文献回顾和滚雪球抽样相结合的方法,我们确定了具有利益相关者参与实施研究历史的退伍军人事务(VA)医疗保健系统研究人员。2016年,我们对28名参与者进行了半结构化的电话采访。两名研究小组成员使用混合的归纳-演绎方法分析了采访数据。结果:参与者描述了多层次利益相关者的投入如何实质性地改善了他们的研究。常见的参与方法在强度上各不相同,包括访谈和焦点小组、咨询委员会和研究团队的利益相关者成员。尽管参与者表达了增加利益相关者参与的愿望——甚至是道德上的要求,但他们的努力受到了组织约束的限制。与会者建议,VA可以通过重新定义资助机制、提供资源和培养符合参与原则的组织文化来支持利益相关者参与研究。结论:经验丰富的研究人员认为,多层次利益相关者参与对实施研究至关重要,而且很难实现。研究结果强调,利益相关者的参与不仅受到研究人员的承诺和技能的影响,还受到组织约束、激励和权力结构的影响。结果为改善参与活动、专业激励和组织基础设施之间的一致性提供了可操作的建议,这些建议可能会加强VA和其他医疗保健环境中涉众参与的实施研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书