Perinatal outcomes in severe preeclampsia with peritoneal ascites - a single tertiary center experience.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Huriye Ezveci, Sukran Doğru, Fatih Akkuş, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Melike Sena Harmancı, Ülfet Sena Metin, Ali Acar
{"title":"Perinatal outcomes in severe preeclampsia with peritoneal ascites - a single tertiary center experience.","authors":"Huriye Ezveci, Sukran Doğru, Fatih Akkuş, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Melike Sena Harmancı, Ülfet Sena Metin, Ali Acar","doi":"10.48095/cccg2026109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with severe preeclampsia (PE) with and without peritoneal ascites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 76 pregnant women diagnosed with severe PE between January 2019 and January 2024 were evaluated, including 23 with peritoneal ascites and 53 without. Maternal demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters including neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with severe PE and peritoneal ascites had higher rates of previous preeclampsia (30.4 vs. 7.5%; P = 0.009), visual symptoms (52.2 vs. 22.6%; P = 0.011), and maternal blood transfusion (47.8 vs. 13.2%; P = 0.001). They also exhibited significantly higher urea levels and proteinuria (P < 0.05). In terms of neonatal outcomes, the ascites group delivered earlier (31.5 ± 3.9 vs. 33.8 ± 3.1 weeks; P = 0.008), had lower birth weights (median 1,400 g vs. 1,990 g; P = 0.015), and higher NICU admission (60.9 vs. 34.0%; P = 0.029) with longer NICU stays (P = 0.003). One case of HELLP syndrome was observed in the ascites group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presence of peritoneal ascites in severe PE is associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including increased transfusion requirement and adverse perinatal indicators. Detection of ascites may serve as an important clinical marker of disease severity, highlighting the need for closer surveillance and timely intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"91 2","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2026109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with severe preeclampsia (PE) with and without peritoneal ascites.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 76 pregnant women diagnosed with severe PE between January 2019 and January 2024 were evaluated, including 23 with peritoneal ascites and 53 without. Maternal demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters including neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: Women with severe PE and peritoneal ascites had higher rates of previous preeclampsia (30.4 vs. 7.5%; P = 0.009), visual symptoms (52.2 vs. 22.6%; P = 0.011), and maternal blood transfusion (47.8 vs. 13.2%; P = 0.001). They also exhibited significantly higher urea levels and proteinuria (P < 0.05). In terms of neonatal outcomes, the ascites group delivered earlier (31.5 ± 3.9 vs. 33.8 ± 3.1 weeks; P = 0.008), had lower birth weights (median 1,400 g vs. 1,990 g; P = 0.015), and higher NICU admission (60.9 vs. 34.0%; P = 0.029) with longer NICU stays (P = 0.003). One case of HELLP syndrome was observed in the ascites group.

Conclusion: Presence of peritoneal ascites in severe PE is associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including increased transfusion requirement and adverse perinatal indicators. Detection of ascites may serve as an important clinical marker of disease severity, highlighting the need for closer surveillance and timely intervention.

严重子痫前期伴腹膜腹水的围产期结局-单一三级中心经验。
目的:本研究旨在评估伴有或不伴有腹膜腹水的重度先兆子痫(PE)妇女的孕产妇和新生儿结局。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,对2019年1月至2024年1月期间诊断为严重PE的76名孕妇进行了评估,其中23名患有腹膜腹水,53名没有腹水。比较两组的产妇人口学、临床和实验室参数,包括新生儿结局。结果:有严重PE和腹膜腹水的妇女有较高的先兆子痫发生率(30.4比7.5%,P = 0.009)、视觉症状发生率(52.2比22.6%,P = 0.011)和母体输血发生率(47.8比13.2%,P = 0.001)。它们的尿素水平和蛋白尿水平也显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。在新生儿结局方面,腹水组分娩时间较早(31.5±3.9周对33.8±3.1周,P = 0.008),出生体重较低(中位1,400 g对1,990 g, P = 0.015),新生儿重症监护病房入院率较高(60.9对34.0%,P = 0.029),新生儿重症监护病房住院时间较长(P = 0.003)。腹水组出现HELLP综合征1例。结论:严重PE患者腹膜腹水的存在与较差的孕产妇和新生儿结局相关,包括输血需求增加和不良围产期指标。腹水的检测可以作为疾病严重程度的重要临床标志,强调需要更密切的监测和及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书