Characterizing P-glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein interactions of asciminib among other tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in chronic myeloid leukemia.
N E Verhagen, D C W Touw, J J M W van den Heuvel, P H van den Broek, N M A Blijlevens, J J W M Janssen, J B Koenderink, F G M Russel
{"title":"Characterizing P-glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein interactions of asciminib among other tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in chronic myeloid leukemia.","authors":"N E Verhagen, D C W Touw, J J M W van den Heuvel, P H van den Broek, N M A Blijlevens, J J W M Janssen, J B Koenderink, F G M Russel","doi":"10.1007/s00280-026-04891-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The distribution of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is influenced by the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP). While most TKI-transporter interactions are well established, limited information is available for the novel STAMP inhibitor asciminib, and divergent data exist for the role of P-gp in nilotinib and bosutinib efflux. This study used in vitro cellular and vesicular transport assays to evaluate the substrate and inhibitory profiles of all TKIs currently used in CML treatment. It was confirmed that asciminib is a substrate of both P-gp and BCRP, similar to imatinib and dasatinib, whereas bosutinib was modestly transported by P-gp only. For P-gp, asciminib appeared to be a weak inhibitor, comparable to dasatinib, whereas nilotinib remained the most potent inhibitor. Conversely, asciminib demonstrated notable potency against BCRP, ranking it among the strong inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib, while dasatinib and bosutinib were less effective. These findings provide further insight into the efflux transporter interactions of asciminib and updated evidence on nilotinib and bosutinib transport by P-gp, with implications for drug resistance and treatment optimization in CML.</p>","PeriodicalId":9556,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13167888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-026-04891-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The distribution of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is influenced by the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP). While most TKI-transporter interactions are well established, limited information is available for the novel STAMP inhibitor asciminib, and divergent data exist for the role of P-gp in nilotinib and bosutinib efflux. This study used in vitro cellular and vesicular transport assays to evaluate the substrate and inhibitory profiles of all TKIs currently used in CML treatment. It was confirmed that asciminib is a substrate of both P-gp and BCRP, similar to imatinib and dasatinib, whereas bosutinib was modestly transported by P-gp only. For P-gp, asciminib appeared to be a weak inhibitor, comparable to dasatinib, whereas nilotinib remained the most potent inhibitor. Conversely, asciminib demonstrated notable potency against BCRP, ranking it among the strong inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib, while dasatinib and bosutinib were less effective. These findings provide further insight into the efflux transporter interactions of asciminib and updated evidence on nilotinib and bosutinib transport by P-gp, with implications for drug resistance and treatment optimization in CML.
期刊介绍:
Addressing a wide range of pharmacologic and oncologic concerns on both experimental and clinical levels, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is an eminent journal in the field. The primary focus in this rapid publication medium is on new anticancer agents, their experimental screening, preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, single and combined drug administration modalities, and clinical phase I, II and III trials. It is essential reading for pharmacologists and oncologists giving results recorded in the following areas: clinical toxicology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and indications for chemotherapy in cancer treatment strategy.