AI Characterisation of Discordance Profiles Between Stress Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Tomoscintigraphy Using Random Forest XGBoost and SHAP.

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2026-05-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S595176
Youness El Maadaoui, Abdelaziz Belaguid, Mohamed Aziz Bsiss, Aboubaker Matrane
{"title":"AI Characterisation of Discordance Profiles Between Stress Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Tomoscintigraphy Using Random Forest XGBoost and SHAP.","authors":"Youness El Maadaoui, Abdelaziz Belaguid, Mohamed Aziz Bsiss, Aboubaker Matrane","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S595176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) using stress ECG and Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS) frequently reveals discrepancies, particularly in patients with a positive ECG and a negative MPS (MPS-/ECG+). This paradoxical group poses a diagnostic challenge, often unexplained by classic statistical analyses. Our study aims to characterize this profile using interpretable Artificial Intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cohort of 86 patients with negative MPS was stratified into a \"discordant\" group (MPS-/ECG+, n=19) and a \"concordant\" group (MPS-/ECG-, n=67). A two-pronged analytical approach was used: (1) bivariate statistical analysis and (2) machine learning modelling. Two algorithms, Random Forest and XGBoost, were trained on a dataset rebalanced using SMOTE. Performance was assessed by AUC, and interpretability was ensured by SHAP analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional univariate statistical analysis did not identify any variable significantly associated with discordance (all p>0.05). In contrast, the XGBoost model, exploiting multivariate interactions, surpassed Random Forest, achieving a moderate but informative performance (AUC = 0.78), with a Sensitivity (Recall) of 67%, a Precision (Positive Predictive Value) of 50% for the discordant class (Class 1), and an overall Accuracy of 76%. SHAP analysis revealed that the most important predictors of discordance were female gender, advanced age, and the presence of diabetes, indicating that the prediction was influenced by the combination of these factors rather than a single one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory study demonstrates the potential value of explainable AI for deciphering complex clinical problems such as MPS/ECG discordance. Our multivariate models identified a potential patient profile associated with of MPS-/ECG+ discordance, characterized by the synergy of clinical factors. These preliminary results suggest that ECG abnormalities in the absence of a perfusion deficit might reflect an underlying pathology (e.g. microvascular disease) rather than a simple false positive, warranting further prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"595176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13156977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S595176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) using stress ECG and Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS) frequently reveals discrepancies, particularly in patients with a positive ECG and a negative MPS (MPS-/ECG+). This paradoxical group poses a diagnostic challenge, often unexplained by classic statistical analyses. Our study aims to characterize this profile using interpretable Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Patients and methods: A cohort of 86 patients with negative MPS was stratified into a "discordant" group (MPS-/ECG+, n=19) and a "concordant" group (MPS-/ECG-, n=67). A two-pronged analytical approach was used: (1) bivariate statistical analysis and (2) machine learning modelling. Two algorithms, Random Forest and XGBoost, were trained on a dataset rebalanced using SMOTE. Performance was assessed by AUC, and interpretability was ensured by SHAP analysis.

Results: Conventional univariate statistical analysis did not identify any variable significantly associated with discordance (all p>0.05). In contrast, the XGBoost model, exploiting multivariate interactions, surpassed Random Forest, achieving a moderate but informative performance (AUC = 0.78), with a Sensitivity (Recall) of 67%, a Precision (Positive Predictive Value) of 50% for the discordant class (Class 1), and an overall Accuracy of 76%. SHAP analysis revealed that the most important predictors of discordance were female gender, advanced age, and the presence of diabetes, indicating that the prediction was influenced by the combination of these factors rather than a single one.

Conclusion: This exploratory study demonstrates the potential value of explainable AI for deciphering complex clinical problems such as MPS/ECG discordance. Our multivariate models identified a potential patient profile associated with of MPS-/ECG+ discordance, characterized by the synergy of clinical factors. These preliminary results suggest that ECG abnormalities in the absence of a perfusion deficit might reflect an underlying pathology (e.g. microvascular disease) rather than a simple false positive, warranting further prospective validation.

随机森林XGBoost和SHAP对应激心电图和心肌断层扫描不一致谱的AI表征。
目的:使用应激心电图和心肌灌注SPECT (MPS)评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)经常发现差异,特别是在ECG阳性和MPS阴性(MPS-/ECG+)的患者中。这一矛盾的群体给诊断带来了挑战,通常无法用经典的统计分析来解释。我们的研究旨在利用可解释的人工智能(AI)来描述这一特征。患者和方法:86例MPS阴性患者被分为“不一致”组(MPS-/ECG+, n=19)和“一致”组(MPS-/ECG-, n=67)。采用了双管齐下的分析方法:(1)双变量统计分析和(2)机器学习建模。随机森林和XGBoost两种算法在使用SMOTE重新平衡的数据集上进行了训练。通过AUC评估性能,并通过SHAP分析确保可解释性。结果:常规单因素统计分析未发现任何与不一致性显著相关的变量(p < 0.05)。相比之下,利用多变量相互作用的XGBoost模型超越了随机森林,实现了中等但信息丰富的性能(AUC = 0.78),敏感度(召回率)为67%,不协调类别(1类)的精度(阳性预测值)为50%,总体准确率为76%。SHAP分析显示,最重要的预测不一致的因素是女性性别、高龄和糖尿病的存在,这表明预测是由这些因素的组合而不是单一因素影响的。结论:本探索性研究证明了可解释人工智能在解读MPS/ECG不一致等复杂临床问题方面的潜在价值。我们的多变量模型确定了MPS-/ECG+不一致的潜在患者特征,其特征是临床因素的协同作用。这些初步结果表明,在没有灌注缺陷的情况下,ECG异常可能反映了潜在的病理(如微血管疾病),而不是简单的假阳性,需要进一步的前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书