Visitor responses to emergency evacuation: A human behavior approach.

IF 4.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-12-30 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.025.44366
Omid Akbarzadeh, Parisa Moshashaei, Hamed Golzad, Henry Liu, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh
{"title":"Visitor responses to emergency evacuation: A human behavior approach.","authors":"Omid Akbarzadeh, Parisa Moshashaei, Hamed Golzad, Henry Liu, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh","doi":"10.34172/hpp.025.44366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates human behaviours during emergency evacuations using data collected at the Tabriz Grand Bazaar (TGB), a UNESCO World Heritage site and the world's largest covered market. While past studies modelled crowd evacuations through simulations, limited empirical research exists on real human behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing on 749 questionnaire responses from TGB visitors, the study explores four key aspects of evacuation dynamics: (1) proactive vs. reactive responses; (2) competitive vs. cooperative interactions; (3) symmetry-breaking behaviours; and (4) route selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that 44.2% of participants reported engaging in competitive behaviours (e.g., pushing), while only 8.4% showed a strong willingness to help others. Over 90% tended to follow others during evacuations, and 77.8% preferred to avoid the least crowded exit, indicating high symmetry-breaking tendencies. No significant correlation was found between gender and evacuation behaviours, but marital status, education, and age were significantly associated with different behavioural strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study contributes by (1) providing behavioural insights for emergency planning, (2) informing the design of realistic evacuation simulations, and (3) offering empirical evidence to support future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"15 4","pages":"370-383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13156258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.025.44366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigates human behaviours during emergency evacuations using data collected at the Tabriz Grand Bazaar (TGB), a UNESCO World Heritage site and the world's largest covered market. While past studies modelled crowd evacuations through simulations, limited empirical research exists on real human behaviour.

Methods: Drawing on 749 questionnaire responses from TGB visitors, the study explores four key aspects of evacuation dynamics: (1) proactive vs. reactive responses; (2) competitive vs. cooperative interactions; (3) symmetry-breaking behaviours; and (4) route selection.

Results: The analysis revealed that 44.2% of participants reported engaging in competitive behaviours (e.g., pushing), while only 8.4% showed a strong willingness to help others. Over 90% tended to follow others during evacuations, and 77.8% preferred to avoid the least crowded exit, indicating high symmetry-breaking tendencies. No significant correlation was found between gender and evacuation behaviours, but marital status, education, and age were significantly associated with different behavioural strategies.

Conclusion: The study contributes by (1) providing behavioural insights for emergency planning, (2) informing the design of realistic evacuation simulations, and (3) offering empirical evidence to support future research.

访客对紧急疏散的反应:人类行为方法。
背景:本研究利用在大不里士大集市(TGB)收集的数据调查紧急疏散期间的人类行为,大不里士大集市是联合国教科文组织世界遗产,也是世界上最大的有盖市场。虽然过去的研究通过模拟来模拟人群疏散,但对真实人类行为的实证研究有限。方法:通过对749名游客的问卷调查,研究了疏散动态的四个关键方面:(1)主动响应与被动响应;(2)竞争与合作互动;(3)对称破缺行为;(4)路线选择。结果:分析显示,44.2%的参与者报告有竞争行为(例如,推动),而只有8.4%的参与者表现出强烈的帮助他人的意愿。超过90%的人在疏散时倾向于跟随他人,77.8%的人倾向于避开最不拥挤的出口,表明高度的对称性破坏倾向。性别与疏散行为之间无显著相关性,但婚姻状况、教育程度和年龄与不同的行为策略显著相关。结论:该研究的贡献在于:(1)为应急规划提供行为洞察;(2)为真实疏散模拟的设计提供信息;(3)为未来的研究提供经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书