Co-creating learning: A qualitative exploration of physiotherapy clinical education.

IF 1.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2026-04-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v82i2.2299
Alison Lupton-Smith, Anna M Schmutz
{"title":"Co-creating learning: A qualitative exploration of physiotherapy clinical education.","authors":"Alison Lupton-Smith, Anna M Schmutz","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v82i2.2299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A large part of physiotherapy clinical training is situated in the workplace. Learning in an authentic environment is supported by facilitators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study focussed on the perceptions and understanding of physiotherapy students and facilitators while learning on the clinical platform.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative methodology within an interpretivist paradigm was followed using convenience sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physiotherapy students (<i>n</i> = 45) in their fourth and final year of study and clinical facilitators of this student group (<i>n</i> = 13) were invited to participate in a focus group discussion (FGD) for the students (<i>n</i> = 7) and semi-structured interviews for the facilitators (<i>n</i> = 7). An inductive data analysis approach was followed. Three themes were generated: <i>Learning as a Shared, Active Process</i>; <i>Relationships, Role Modelling and Power Dynamics in Clinical Learning</i>; and <i>the Clinical Environment as Both Constraint and Catalyst</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across themes, learning was shaped by how students and facilitators understood and enacted their roles, the degree to which student agency was recognised and supported, and how relational safety and environmental constraints mediated engagement. Implicit and sometimes misaligned expectations between students and facilitators influenced whether learning opportunities were taken up or constrained. Clinical learning emerged as a co-constructed, relational process rather than a unidirectional transfer of knowledge.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Supporting meaningful learning in the clinical environment requires greater attention to implicit expectations, relational dynamics and the conditions under which student agency can be enacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"82 2","pages":"2299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13149561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v82i2.2299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A large part of physiotherapy clinical training is situated in the workplace. Learning in an authentic environment is supported by facilitators.

Objectives: This study focussed on the perceptions and understanding of physiotherapy students and facilitators while learning on the clinical platform.

Method: A qualitative methodology within an interpretivist paradigm was followed using convenience sampling.

Results: Physiotherapy students (n = 45) in their fourth and final year of study and clinical facilitators of this student group (n = 13) were invited to participate in a focus group discussion (FGD) for the students (n = 7) and semi-structured interviews for the facilitators (n = 7). An inductive data analysis approach was followed. Three themes were generated: Learning as a Shared, Active Process; Relationships, Role Modelling and Power Dynamics in Clinical Learning; and the Clinical Environment as Both Constraint and Catalyst.

Conclusion: Across themes, learning was shaped by how students and facilitators understood and enacted their roles, the degree to which student agency was recognised and supported, and how relational safety and environmental constraints mediated engagement. Implicit and sometimes misaligned expectations between students and facilitators influenced whether learning opportunities were taken up or constrained. Clinical learning emerged as a co-constructed, relational process rather than a unidirectional transfer of knowledge.

Clinical implications: Supporting meaningful learning in the clinical environment requires greater attention to implicit expectations, relational dynamics and the conditions under which student agency can be enacted.

共创学习:物理治疗临床教学的定性探索。
背景:很大一部分物理治疗临床培训是在工作场所进行的。在真实的环境中学习是由辅导员支持的。目的:本研究的重点是物理治疗学生和辅导员在临床平台学习时的认知和理解。方法:在解释主义范式下,采用方便抽样的定性方法。结果:我们邀请四年级和最后一年的物理治疗专业学生(n = 45)和该学生组的临床辅导员(n = 13)参加学生(n = 7)的焦点小组讨论(FGD)和辅导员(n = 7)的半结构化访谈。采用归纳数据分析方法。会议产生了三个主题:学习是一个共享的、积极的过程;临床学习中的关系、角色建模和权力动力学临床环境既是约束又是催化剂。结论:在各个主题中,学习是由学生和辅导员如何理解和扮演他们的角色,学生代理的认可和支持程度,以及关系安全和环境约束如何中介参与来塑造的。学生和辅导员之间隐含的、有时不一致的期望影响了学习机会是被利用还是被限制。临床学习成为一种共同构建的关系过程,而不是单向的知识转移。临床意义:在临床环境中支持有意义的学习需要更多地关注内隐期望、关系动态和学生代理可以实施的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书