From Patienthood to Active Collaboration: Advancing Lived Experience Expertise in Addressing the Economic Determinants of Mental Health.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-06 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000466
Oscar Jiménez-Solomon, Laura López-Aybar
{"title":"From Patienthood to Active Collaboration: Advancing Lived Experience Expertise in Addressing the Economic Determinants of Mental Health.","authors":"Oscar Jiménez-Solomon, Laura López-Aybar","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Economic hardship-including poverty, housing insecurity, unemployment, food insecurity, and debt-is among the most consistently documented determinants of mental health. Extensive epidemiologic and social science research shows that adverse economic conditions increase the risk, severity, and persistence of depression, anxiety, suicidality, and severe mental illness. Although social policies can improve mental health outcomes, relatively few interventions within mental health systems target economic determinants. Those that do are often professionally designed and limited in scope. In this perspective article, we argue that advancing effective and equitable interventions that address economic determinants of mental health requires meaningful participation of people with lived experiences of economic hardship and mental health challenges. Drawing on epistemological and empirical literatures, we conceptualize lived experience as a form of expertise and contend that its systematic exclusion constitutes epistemic injustice and a barrier to intervention relevance and effectiveness. Using the International Association for Public Participation's Spectrum of Public Participation, we propose a framework for integrating lived experience expertise across the intervention cycle (i.e., needs assessment, design, implementation, and evaluation). Emphasizing collaboration and empowerment, we illustrate this framework with examples from the literature and highlight both its promise and limitations. We then identify systemic factors underlying these challenges-such as funding structures, governance, regulatory constraints, and capacity gaps-and offer practice-informed recommendations to address them. We conclude with a call to psychiatry and clinical professions to act as allies in redistributing epistemic and decision-making authority, positioning lived expertise as essential to interventions addressing economic determinants of mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":"34 3","pages":"189-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic hardship-including poverty, housing insecurity, unemployment, food insecurity, and debt-is among the most consistently documented determinants of mental health. Extensive epidemiologic and social science research shows that adverse economic conditions increase the risk, severity, and persistence of depression, anxiety, suicidality, and severe mental illness. Although social policies can improve mental health outcomes, relatively few interventions within mental health systems target economic determinants. Those that do are often professionally designed and limited in scope. In this perspective article, we argue that advancing effective and equitable interventions that address economic determinants of mental health requires meaningful participation of people with lived experiences of economic hardship and mental health challenges. Drawing on epistemological and empirical literatures, we conceptualize lived experience as a form of expertise and contend that its systematic exclusion constitutes epistemic injustice and a barrier to intervention relevance and effectiveness. Using the International Association for Public Participation's Spectrum of Public Participation, we propose a framework for integrating lived experience expertise across the intervention cycle (i.e., needs assessment, design, implementation, and evaluation). Emphasizing collaboration and empowerment, we illustrate this framework with examples from the literature and highlight both its promise and limitations. We then identify systemic factors underlying these challenges-such as funding structures, governance, regulatory constraints, and capacity gaps-and offer practice-informed recommendations to address them. We conclude with a call to psychiatry and clinical professions to act as allies in redistributing epistemic and decision-making authority, positioning lived expertise as essential to interventions addressing economic determinants of mental health.

从耐心到积极合作:在解决心理健康的经济决定因素方面推进生活经验专业知识。
经济困难——包括贫困、住房无保障、失业、粮食无保障和债务——是记录最一致的心理健康决定因素之一。广泛的流行病学和社会科学研究表明,不利的经济条件增加了抑郁、焦虑、自杀和严重精神疾病的风险、严重程度和持久性。虽然社会政策可以改善精神卫生结果,但精神卫生系统内针对经济决定因素的干预措施相对较少。那些做的通常是专业设计的,范围有限。在这篇观点文章中,我们认为,推进有效和公平的干预措施,解决心理健康的经济决定因素,需要有经济困难和心理健康挑战的生活经历的人有意义的参与。借鉴认识论和经验文献,我们将生活经验概念化为一种专业知识形式,并认为其系统性排斥构成了认识上的不公正,并成为干预相关性和有效性的障碍。利用国际公众参与协会的公众参与频谱,我们提出了一个框架,用于整合整个干预周期(即需求评估、设计、实施和评估)的生活经验专业知识。强调协作和授权,我们用文献中的例子来说明这个框架,并强调其前景和局限性。然后,我们确定了这些挑战背后的系统性因素——如资金结构、治理、监管约束和能力差距——并提供了基于实践的建议来解决这些问题。最后,我们呼吁精神病学和临床专业人士作为重新分配知识和决策权威的盟友,将生活专业知识定位为解决精神健康经济决定因素的干预措施的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书