Assessing the technical capability of a room- and a gantry-mounted kV imaging device for intra-fractional fluoroscopy during stereotactic lung radiotherapy at a C-arm linear accelerator
Hannah Jungreuthmayer , Barbara Knäusl , Julius Arnold , Martin Buschmann , Andreas Renner , Maximilian Schmid , Dietmar Georg , Wolfgang Lechner
{"title":"Assessing the technical capability of a room- and a gantry-mounted kV imaging device for intra-fractional fluoroscopy during stereotactic lung radiotherapy at a C-arm linear accelerator","authors":"Hannah Jungreuthmayer , Barbara Knäusl , Julius Arnold , Martin Buschmann , Andreas Renner , Maximilian Schmid , Dietmar Georg , Wolfgang Lechner","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose:</h3><div>Monitoring lung tumors during stereotactic radiotherapy is important for managing breathing motion, yet the high-performance imaging modules on C-arm linear accelerators are mainly used for patient positioning. This study benchmarked a room-mounted against a gantry-mounted kilovolt (kV) imaging device to assess their potential for lung tumor fluoroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>The investigated systems were the ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD, Brainlab, Germany) and the X-ray Volumetric Imaging (XVI, Elekta, Sweden). Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) and entrance air kerma were measured for different imaging settings — tube voltage (70<!--> <!-->kV to 130<!--> <!-->kV), current (10<!--> <!-->mA to 320<!--> <!-->mA), exposure time (100<!--> <!-->ms and 40<!--> <!-->ms) — using two anthropomorphic thorax phantoms housing three tumors. Additionally, CNR change as a function of time, achievable fluoroscopy imaging duration based on X-ray generator and anode heat and X-ray tube cool-down were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>CNRs agreed within 15% for the two systems and changed less than 2% over the investigated fluoroscopy durations. Using default imaging settings and considering the average clinical duration of stereotactic lung treatments, entrance air kermas were 44<!--> <!-->mGy (room-mounted) and 41<!--> <!-->mGy (gantry-mounted). Achievable fluoroscopy durations with default settings were 87<!--> <!-->s and 1350<!--> <!-->s, respectively. Anode cool-down times were 125<!--> <!-->min (room-mounted) and 215<!--> <!-->min (gantry-mounted).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The performance metrics of the room-mounted imaging system aligned with those of the gantry-mounted device with regard to CNR and air kerma. The room-mounted system showed a preferable cool-down behavior. However, adaptation of imaging settings is necessary to increase the fluoroscopy duration and avoid overheating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626000886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose:
Monitoring lung tumors during stereotactic radiotherapy is important for managing breathing motion, yet the high-performance imaging modules on C-arm linear accelerators are mainly used for patient positioning. This study benchmarked a room-mounted against a gantry-mounted kilovolt (kV) imaging device to assess their potential for lung tumor fluoroscopy.
Materials and Methods:
The investigated systems were the ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD, Brainlab, Germany) and the X-ray Volumetric Imaging (XVI, Elekta, Sweden). Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) and entrance air kerma were measured for different imaging settings — tube voltage (70 kV to 130 kV), current (10 mA to 320 mA), exposure time (100 ms and 40 ms) — using two anthropomorphic thorax phantoms housing three tumors. Additionally, CNR change as a function of time, achievable fluoroscopy imaging duration based on X-ray generator and anode heat and X-ray tube cool-down were evaluated.
Results:
CNRs agreed within 15% for the two systems and changed less than 2% over the investigated fluoroscopy durations. Using default imaging settings and considering the average clinical duration of stereotactic lung treatments, entrance air kermas were 44 mGy (room-mounted) and 41 mGy (gantry-mounted). Achievable fluoroscopy durations with default settings were 87 s and 1350 s, respectively. Anode cool-down times were 125 min (room-mounted) and 215 min (gantry-mounted).
Conclusion:
The performance metrics of the room-mounted imaging system aligned with those of the gantry-mounted device with regard to CNR and air kerma. The room-mounted system showed a preferable cool-down behavior. However, adaptation of imaging settings is necessary to increase the fluoroscopy duration and avoid overheating.