Expanded Biological Characterization of Autograft-Derived Contributions to Spinal Fusion: Graft-Derived Progenitors Contribute via Endochondral Bone Formation.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Atsuyuki Kawabata, Duby D Okonkwo, Takuya Oyaizu, Byron F Stephens, Craig R Louer, Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge, Rachel M Mckee, J Court Reese, Satoru Egawa, Toshitaka Yoshii, Jonathan G Schoenecker
{"title":"Expanded Biological Characterization of Autograft-Derived Contributions to Spinal Fusion: Graft-Derived Progenitors Contribute via Endochondral Bone Formation.","authors":"Atsuyuki Kawabata, Duby D Okonkwo, Takuya Oyaizu, Byron F Stephens, Craig R Louer, Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge, Rachel M Mckee, J Court Reese, Satoru Egawa, Toshitaka Yoshii, Jonathan G Schoenecker","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Autologous bone graft remains the clinical standard in spinal fusion due to its reliable performance. Characterization of the biological mechanism underlying the clinical superiority of autologous bone graft in spinal fusion remains incomplete. The field is divided between \"creeping substitution,\" which posits the graft as a passive scaffold whose cells perish, and the \"cellular hypothesis,\" which argues for an active contribution from viable donor cells.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to build upon prior work by further characterizing graft-derived cell survival after transplantation and identify the biological mechanisms by which these cells may contribute to spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We employed an immunocompetent \"sibling-pair\" murine posterolateral fusion model (L3-L4) of Iliac bone grafting for this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Autologous Iliac bone grafts from fluorescent reporter mice were transplanted into non-fluorescent siblings. A panel of inducible Cre-lox reporter lines (CAG, Col1a1, Sox9, and Aggrecan) was used to trace the fate of specific graft-derived cell populations. A pre-grafting induction strategy was used to label mature cells at harvest, while a post-grafting induction strategy identified donor progenitor cells that survived and differentiated in vivo. Fusion masses were analyzed at 2- and 6-weeks following grafting via microCT, histology, and fluorescence microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pan-cellular (CAG-Cre) tracing suggests robust donor cell survival and integration into the 2 and 6-week fusion masses. In contrast, pre-labeled grafted mature osteoblasts and osteocytes (Col1a1-Cre) were largely absent at all time points, suggesting this population does not meaningfully survive transplantation. Post-grafting induction of Col1a1-Cre mice revealed the emergence of numerous new, donor-derived osteoblasts at 2 and 6 weeks, suggesting their origin from an unlabeled progenitor pool. Additionally, post-grafting induction of chondrocyte-lineage reporters (Sox9-Cre, Aggrecan-Cre) demonstrated the appearance of donor-derived chondrocytes at 2 weeks, which subsequently transitioned into osteocytes within the mature bone by 6 weeks suggesting endochondral ossification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings builds on prior work supporting the \"cellular hypothesis\" which argues that autologous bone grafts contribute viable cells. Furthermore, our findings suggest a model of \" Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells (SSPC)-driven Adaptation,\" where the ICBG serves as a vehicle for resilient Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells (SSPCs). These progenitors, rather than mature osteoblasts, appear to survive transplantation and adapt to the avascular fusion bed by initiating endochondral ossification to form the fusion mass.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This suggests that the clinical focus on mature \"osteogenic\" cells may be complemented by consideration of skeletal stem and progenitor cell (SSPC) populations. Autograft quality may be defined, in part, by its SSPC content. This provides an additional potential benchmark for evaluating autograft quality and developing cell-based biologics. Furthermore, these findings have potential implications for intraoperative decisions regarding graft handling and harvesting to preserve SSPC-rich regions such as periosteum.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Autologous bone graft remains the clinical standard in spinal fusion due to its reliable performance. Characterization of the biological mechanism underlying the clinical superiority of autologous bone graft in spinal fusion remains incomplete. The field is divided between "creeping substitution," which posits the graft as a passive scaffold whose cells perish, and the "cellular hypothesis," which argues for an active contribution from viable donor cells.

Purpose: This study aimed to build upon prior work by further characterizing graft-derived cell survival after transplantation and identify the biological mechanisms by which these cells may contribute to spinal fusion.

Study design: We employed an immunocompetent "sibling-pair" murine posterolateral fusion model (L3-L4) of Iliac bone grafting for this study.

Methods: Autologous Iliac bone grafts from fluorescent reporter mice were transplanted into non-fluorescent siblings. A panel of inducible Cre-lox reporter lines (CAG, Col1a1, Sox9, and Aggrecan) was used to trace the fate of specific graft-derived cell populations. A pre-grafting induction strategy was used to label mature cells at harvest, while a post-grafting induction strategy identified donor progenitor cells that survived and differentiated in vivo. Fusion masses were analyzed at 2- and 6-weeks following grafting via microCT, histology, and fluorescence microscopy.

Results: Pan-cellular (CAG-Cre) tracing suggests robust donor cell survival and integration into the 2 and 6-week fusion masses. In contrast, pre-labeled grafted mature osteoblasts and osteocytes (Col1a1-Cre) were largely absent at all time points, suggesting this population does not meaningfully survive transplantation. Post-grafting induction of Col1a1-Cre mice revealed the emergence of numerous new, donor-derived osteoblasts at 2 and 6 weeks, suggesting their origin from an unlabeled progenitor pool. Additionally, post-grafting induction of chondrocyte-lineage reporters (Sox9-Cre, Aggrecan-Cre) demonstrated the appearance of donor-derived chondrocytes at 2 weeks, which subsequently transitioned into osteocytes within the mature bone by 6 weeks suggesting endochondral ossification.

Conclusions: These findings builds on prior work supporting the "cellular hypothesis" which argues that autologous bone grafts contribute viable cells. Furthermore, our findings suggest a model of " Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells (SSPC)-driven Adaptation," where the ICBG serves as a vehicle for resilient Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells (SSPCs). These progenitors, rather than mature osteoblasts, appear to survive transplantation and adapt to the avascular fusion bed by initiating endochondral ossification to form the fusion mass.

Clinical significance: This suggests that the clinical focus on mature "osteogenic" cells may be complemented by consideration of skeletal stem and progenitor cell (SSPC) populations. Autograft quality may be defined, in part, by its SSPC content. This provides an additional potential benchmark for evaluating autograft quality and developing cell-based biologics. Furthermore, these findings have potential implications for intraoperative decisions regarding graft handling and harvesting to preserve SSPC-rich regions such as periosteum.

自体移植物对脊柱融合贡献的扩展生物学特性:移植物衍生祖细胞通过软骨内骨形成发挥作用。
背景背景:自体骨移植由于其可靠的性能而成为脊柱融合的临床标准。关于自体骨移植在脊柱融合术中临床优势的生物学机制的描述仍然不完整。该领域分为“缓慢替代”和“细胞假说”两种,前者认为移植物是一种被动的支架,其细胞会死亡,后者认为有活力的供体细胞会积极贡献。目的:本研究旨在建立在先前工作的基础上,进一步表征移植后移植物来源的细胞存活,并确定这些细胞可能有助于脊柱融合的生物学机制。研究设计:本研究采用具有免疫功能的“兄弟姐妹”小鼠髂骨移植后外侧融合模型(L3-L4)。方法:将荧光报告小鼠的自体髂骨移植物移植到非荧光兄弟姐妹中。一组可诱导的Cre-lox报告系(CAG、Col1a1、Sox9和Aggrecan)用于追踪特定移植物来源细胞群体的命运。移植前诱导策略用于在收获时标记成熟细胞,而移植后诱导策略用于鉴定存活并在体内分化的供体祖细胞。在移植后2周和6周通过显微ct、组织学和荧光显微镜分析融合块。结果:泛细胞(CAG-Cre)示踪显示供体细胞存活良好,并融入2周和6周的融合团。相比之下,预先标记的移植成熟成骨细胞和骨细胞(Col1a1-Cre)在所有时间点都基本缺失,这表明这一群体在移植后无法存活。移植后诱导的Col1a1-Cre小鼠在2周和6周时出现了许多新的供体来源的成骨细胞,表明它们来自未标记的祖细胞池。此外,移植后诱导的软骨细胞谱系报告者(Sox9-Cre, aggrean - cre)在2周时显示供体来源的软骨细胞出现,随后在6周时在成熟骨内转变为骨细胞,表明软骨内成骨。结论:这些发现建立在先前支持“细胞假说”的工作基础上,该假说认为自体骨移植可以提供活细胞。此外,我们的研究结果提出了一个“骨骼干细胞和祖细胞(SSPC)驱动的适应”模型,其中ICBG作为弹性骨骼干细胞和祖细胞(SSPC)的载体。这些祖细胞,而不是成熟的成骨细胞,似乎在移植中存活下来,并通过启动软骨内成骨形成融合块来适应无血管融合床。临床意义:这表明临床对成熟“成骨”细胞的关注可以通过考虑骨骼干细胞和祖细胞(SSPC)群体来补充。自体移植物的质量可以部分地由其SSPC含量来定义。这为评估自体移植物质量和开发基于细胞的生物制剂提供了一个额外的潜在基准。此外,这些发现对术中关于移植物处理和收获的决策具有潜在的意义,以保护骨膜等富含sspc的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书