Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: From general theory to practical insights.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Marlena S Bannick, Yanyao Yi, Ting Ye
{"title":"Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: From general theory to practical insights.","authors":"Marlena S Bannick, Yanyao Yi, Ting Ye","doi":"10.1177/17407745261442586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Covariate adjustment uses baseline prognostic variables to improve the precision of treatment effect estimates. Recent Food and Drug Administration guidance and scientific consensus emphasize three principles for its use, namely estimand-focused analyses, assumption-lean robustness, and fit-for-purpose variance estimation. Despite substantial methodological progress, practical guidance for trial practitioners remains fragmented. We review covariate adjustment strategies for continuous, discrete, and time-to-event endpoints in randomized trials that adhere to these three principles. We show how unadjusted estimators, as well as linear and non-linear adjusted estimators, can be viewed as special cases of the general augmented inverse probability weighting framework. For time-to-event endpoints, we describe how covariate adjustment can be applied to Kaplan-Meier estimators, log-rank tests, and estimation of the unconditional hazard ratio without altering the estimand or introducing additional assumptions. We also synthesize recent developments in multi-arm trials, covariate-adaptive randomization, data-adaptive covariate selection, and covariate adjustment in interim analyses, and we provide practical insights for implementation. Covariate-adjusted estimators target the same marginal estimands as unadjusted analyses but typically achieve greater efficiency. Linear adjustment with Analysis of Heterogeneous Covariance guarantees asymptotic efficiency gains under minimal assumptions. Augmented inverse probability weighting generalizes covariate adjustment to flexible modeling frameworks and remains consistent even under model misspecification. For survival analysis, covariate-adjusted versions of the log-rank test and Cox model improve power without altering the estimand or requiring additional assumptions. Properly accounting for covariate-adaptive randomization is essential for valid inference. The reviewed methods are implemented in the RobinCar family of R packages: RobinCar and RobinCar2. Covariate adjustment is a principled and practical approach for improving trial efficiency, aligned with current regulatory guidance. By adhering to the principles of estimand-focus, assumption-lean robustness, and fit-for-purpose variance estimation, practitioners can apply covariate adjustment with confidence across diverse trial settings. Further work on evaluating finite-sample performance and re-analyses of completed trials will deepen understanding of covariate adjustment in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"17407745261442586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261442586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covariate adjustment uses baseline prognostic variables to improve the precision of treatment effect estimates. Recent Food and Drug Administration guidance and scientific consensus emphasize three principles for its use, namely estimand-focused analyses, assumption-lean robustness, and fit-for-purpose variance estimation. Despite substantial methodological progress, practical guidance for trial practitioners remains fragmented. We review covariate adjustment strategies for continuous, discrete, and time-to-event endpoints in randomized trials that adhere to these three principles. We show how unadjusted estimators, as well as linear and non-linear adjusted estimators, can be viewed as special cases of the general augmented inverse probability weighting framework. For time-to-event endpoints, we describe how covariate adjustment can be applied to Kaplan-Meier estimators, log-rank tests, and estimation of the unconditional hazard ratio without altering the estimand or introducing additional assumptions. We also synthesize recent developments in multi-arm trials, covariate-adaptive randomization, data-adaptive covariate selection, and covariate adjustment in interim analyses, and we provide practical insights for implementation. Covariate-adjusted estimators target the same marginal estimands as unadjusted analyses but typically achieve greater efficiency. Linear adjustment with Analysis of Heterogeneous Covariance guarantees asymptotic efficiency gains under minimal assumptions. Augmented inverse probability weighting generalizes covariate adjustment to flexible modeling frameworks and remains consistent even under model misspecification. For survival analysis, covariate-adjusted versions of the log-rank test and Cox model improve power without altering the estimand or requiring additional assumptions. Properly accounting for covariate-adaptive randomization is essential for valid inference. The reviewed methods are implemented in the RobinCar family of R packages: RobinCar and RobinCar2. Covariate adjustment is a principled and practical approach for improving trial efficiency, aligned with current regulatory guidance. By adhering to the principles of estimand-focus, assumption-lean robustness, and fit-for-purpose variance estimation, practitioners can apply covariate adjustment with confidence across diverse trial settings. Further work on evaluating finite-sample performance and re-analyses of completed trials will deepen understanding of covariate adjustment in practice.

随机临床试验中的协变量调整:从一般理论到实践见解。
协变量调整使用基线预后变量来提高治疗效果估计的精度。最近美国食品和药物管理局的指导和科学共识强调了其使用的三个原则,即以估计为中心的分析,假设精益的稳健性和适合目的的方差估计。尽管在方法学上取得了实质性进展,但对临床试验从业人员的实际指导仍然支离破碎。我们回顾了遵循这三个原则的随机试验中连续、离散和事件时间终点的协变量调整策略。我们展示了未调整估计量,以及线性和非线性调整估计量,如何被视为一般增广逆概率加权框架的特殊情况。对于时间到事件的终点,我们描述了协变量调整如何应用于Kaplan-Meier估计、对数秩检验和无条件风险比的估计,而不改变估计或引入额外的假设。我们还综合了多组试验、协变量自适应随机化、数据自适应协变量选择和中期分析协变量调整的最新进展,并为实施提供了实用的见解。协变量调整估计器的目标是与未调整分析相同的边际估计,但通常达到更高的效率。采用异质协方差分析的线性调整保证了在最小假设下的渐近效率增益。增广逆概率加权将协变量调整推广到灵活的建模框架中,即使在模型不规范的情况下也保持一致。对于生存分析,对数秩检验和Cox模型的协变量调整版本在不改变估计或需要额外假设的情况下提高了功效。正确考虑协变量自适应随机化是有效推理的必要条件。回顾的方法是在RobinCar家族的R包中实现的:RobinCar和robinc2。协变量调整是提高审判效率的一种原则性和实用性的方法,符合当前的监管指导。通过坚持以估计为中心、假设精益的稳健性和符合目的的方差估计的原则,从业者可以在不同的试验设置中有信心地应用协变量调整。进一步评估有限样本性能和重新分析已完成的试验将加深对协变量调整在实践中的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书