Evaluation of standardized pharmacist dosing approach of epoetin in acutely hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease

JAPhA Practice Innovations Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.japhpi.2026.100109
Dennis Dubovetsky, Heeyun Choi, Maha Fansa
{"title":"Evaluation of standardized pharmacist dosing approach of epoetin in acutely hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease","authors":"Dennis Dubovetsky,&nbsp;Heeyun Choi,&nbsp;Maha Fansa","doi":"10.1016/j.japhpi.2026.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Practice guidelines recommend an individualized dosing strategy approach for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy because of the narrow therapeutic range of target hemoglobin (Hb). Data on optimal dosing of ESA in acutely hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well established.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The study aimed to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-driven dosing standardization of ESA on efficacy, safety, and associated costs in acutely hospitalized non-dialysis and dialysis-dependent patients with CKD anemia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort evaluating the impact of pharmacist-driven initial ESA dose optimization intervention compared to standard of care. Outcomes evaluated included ESA dosing characterization, clinical safety, and efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included a total of 254 patients. Baseline characteristics were equally balanced for the majority. The intervention group favored a reduction in the primary outcome of median ESA dose: 100 units/kg/dose compared to 137 units/kg/dose (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The intervention group was associated with reduced ESA dosing characteristics: total dose of ESA per patient (30,000 units vs. 40,000 units, <em>P</em> = 0.047); total dose of ESA (5,659,000 units vs. 6,733,000 units, <em>P</em> = 0.047); and the total weekly dose of ESA used per patient (15,000 units vs. 20,000 units, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The intervention group yielded a total estimated drug-related savings of $19,267.56. There were no differences in clinical outcomes: the last known Hb (<em>P</em> = 0.096), relative change of Hb (<em>P</em> = 0.768), absolute change of Hb (<em>P</em> = 0.809), packed red blood cell transfusion (<em>P</em> = 0.167), hospitalization within 90 days due to thrombotic events (<em>P</em> = 0.271), proportion of patients experiencing hypertensive crisis (<em>P</em> = 0.132), and inpatient survival (<em>P</em> = 0.725). The intervention group was associated with a longer length of stay (15 days vs. 11 days, <em>P</em> = 0.009), a finding likely associated with confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pharmacist-driven dosing standardization protocol limited to initial ESA dose adjustment was associated with reduced ESA use in acutely hospitalized patients with CKD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100737,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969026000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Practice guidelines recommend an individualized dosing strategy approach for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy because of the narrow therapeutic range of target hemoglobin (Hb). Data on optimal dosing of ESA in acutely hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well established.

Objectives

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-driven dosing standardization of ESA on efficacy, safety, and associated costs in acutely hospitalized non-dialysis and dialysis-dependent patients with CKD anemia.

Methods

The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort evaluating the impact of pharmacist-driven initial ESA dose optimization intervention compared to standard of care. Outcomes evaluated included ESA dosing characterization, clinical safety, and efficacy.

Results

The study included a total of 254 patients. Baseline characteristics were equally balanced for the majority. The intervention group favored a reduction in the primary outcome of median ESA dose: 100 units/kg/dose compared to 137 units/kg/dose (P < 0.001). The intervention group was associated with reduced ESA dosing characteristics: total dose of ESA per patient (30,000 units vs. 40,000 units, P = 0.047); total dose of ESA (5,659,000 units vs. 6,733,000 units, P = 0.047); and the total weekly dose of ESA used per patient (15,000 units vs. 20,000 units, P < 0.001). The intervention group yielded a total estimated drug-related savings of $19,267.56. There were no differences in clinical outcomes: the last known Hb (P = 0.096), relative change of Hb (P = 0.768), absolute change of Hb (P = 0.809), packed red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.167), hospitalization within 90 days due to thrombotic events (P = 0.271), proportion of patients experiencing hypertensive crisis (P = 0.132), and inpatient survival (P = 0.725). The intervention group was associated with a longer length of stay (15 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.009), a finding likely associated with confounders.

Conclusion

Pharmacist-driven dosing standardization protocol limited to initial ESA dose adjustment was associated with reduced ESA use in acutely hospitalized patients with CKD.
急性住院慢性肾病患者依生成素标准化给药方法的评价
背景:由于靶血红蛋白(Hb)的治疗范围较窄,实践指南推荐个体化的促红细胞生成素(ESA)治疗策略。急性住院慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者服用ESA的最佳剂量尚无明确的数据。目的:本研究旨在评估药师驱动的ESA剂量标准化对急性住院非透析和透析依赖的CKD贫血患者的疗效、安全性和相关成本的影响。方法本研究采用单中心、回顾性队列研究,评估药师驱动的初始ESA剂量优化干预与标准护理的影响。评估的结果包括ESA给药特性、临床安全性和有效性。结果共纳入254例患者。基线特征对大多数人来说是平衡的。干预组倾向于降低ESA中位剂量的主要结局:100单位/kg/剂量与137单位/kg/剂量相比(P < 0.001)。干预组与降低ESA给药特征相关:每位患者的ESA总剂量(30,000单位对40,000单位,P = 0.047);欧空局总剂量(5,659,000单位对6,733,000单位,P = 0.047);以及每位患者每周使用的ESA总剂量(15,000单位对20,000单位,P < 0.001)。干预组估计总共节省了19 267.56美元与毒品有关的费用。两组临床结局无差异:最后已知Hb (P = 0.096)、Hb相对变化(P = 0.768)、Hb绝对变化(P = 0.809)、填充红细胞输注(P = 0.167)、因血栓形成事件住院90天(P = 0.271)、高血压危重患者比例(P = 0.132)、住院生存率(P = 0.725)。干预组的住院时间较长(15天对11天,P = 0.009),这一发现可能与混杂因素有关。结论限于初始ESA剂量调整的药师驱动剂量标准化方案与CKD急性住院患者ESA使用减少相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书