Disrupted sediment pathways and coastal erosion governance: Integrating riverine dynamics and livelihood-dependent community perception along Sri Lanka’s southwestern coast

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Regional Studies in Marine Science Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.rsma.2026.105038
Dilshan Vithanage , R.S.M. Samarasekara , Charmalie Nahallage , Hasitha Siriwardana , J.K.V. Karunathilaka , S.M.L.M.B. Samarakoon , T.S.B. Wedagedara , D.M.S. Murage , N. Pathinayake
{"title":"Disrupted sediment pathways and coastal erosion governance: Integrating riverine dynamics and livelihood-dependent community perception along Sri Lanka’s southwestern coast","authors":"Dilshan Vithanage ,&nbsp;R.S.M. Samarasekara ,&nbsp;Charmalie Nahallage ,&nbsp;Hasitha Siriwardana ,&nbsp;J.K.V. Karunathilaka ,&nbsp;S.M.L.M.B. Samarakoon ,&nbsp;T.S.B. Wedagedara ,&nbsp;D.M.S. Murage ,&nbsp;N. Pathinayake","doi":"10.1016/j.rsma.2026.105038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal erosion along river-influenced shorelines results from complex interactions between altered sediment dynamics and human interventions, yet management strategies often rely on fragmented physical or social assessments. This study investigates coastal erosion along the Bentota-Colombo Port City coastline in Southwest Sri Lanka by integrating empirical sediment transport analysis of the Kalu River system with an assessment of coastal stakeholder perceptions. Sediment transport patterns were analysed to quantify changes in river-coast connectivity, particularly following the 2017 estuarine modification, while community perceptions were evaluated using structured surveys and stakeholder engagement across multiple coastal user groups. Results indicate that riverine and estuarine modifications have altered sediment flux pathways, contributing to sediment deficits along adjacent beaches and exacerbating shoreline instability. Conversely, stakeholder perceptions of erosion drivers are primarily shaped by visible coastal interventions, such as hard engineering structures and large-scale developments, while upstream sediment processes remain underrecognized. This mismatch between measured sediment dynamics and public understanding influences management preferences, often favouring reactive, site-specific engineering solutions over holistic strategies. By linking physical sediment evidence with community perceptions, the study demonstrates how gaps between scientific knowledge and social interpretation can undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of coastal management interventions. The findings emphasize the need for integrated, source-to-sink governance approaches that align sediment management strategies with stakeholder awareness and participation. This framework provides actionable insights for erosion management in monsoon-dominated, data-limited coastal systems undergoing rapid development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21070,"journal":{"name":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 105038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485526002938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal erosion along river-influenced shorelines results from complex interactions between altered sediment dynamics and human interventions, yet management strategies often rely on fragmented physical or social assessments. This study investigates coastal erosion along the Bentota-Colombo Port City coastline in Southwest Sri Lanka by integrating empirical sediment transport analysis of the Kalu River system with an assessment of coastal stakeholder perceptions. Sediment transport patterns were analysed to quantify changes in river-coast connectivity, particularly following the 2017 estuarine modification, while community perceptions were evaluated using structured surveys and stakeholder engagement across multiple coastal user groups. Results indicate that riverine and estuarine modifications have altered sediment flux pathways, contributing to sediment deficits along adjacent beaches and exacerbating shoreline instability. Conversely, stakeholder perceptions of erosion drivers are primarily shaped by visible coastal interventions, such as hard engineering structures and large-scale developments, while upstream sediment processes remain underrecognized. This mismatch between measured sediment dynamics and public understanding influences management preferences, often favouring reactive, site-specific engineering solutions over holistic strategies. By linking physical sediment evidence with community perceptions, the study demonstrates how gaps between scientific knowledge and social interpretation can undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of coastal management interventions. The findings emphasize the need for integrated, source-to-sink governance approaches that align sediment management strategies with stakeholder awareness and participation. This framework provides actionable insights for erosion management in monsoon-dominated, data-limited coastal systems undergoing rapid development.
泥沙路径中断与海岸侵蚀治理:整合斯里兰卡西南海岸的河流动态和依赖生计的社区感知
受河流影响的海岸线沿岸侵蚀是泥沙动态变化和人类干预之间复杂的相互作用的结果,但管理策略往往依赖于零碎的物理或社会评估。本研究对斯里兰卡西南部本托塔-科伦坡港口城市海岸线的海岸侵蚀进行了调查,方法是将卡鲁河系统的泥沙输运经验分析与沿海利益相关者的看法评估相结合。分析了沉积物运输模式,以量化河流与海岸连通性的变化,特别是在2017年河口改造之后,同时使用结构化调查和多个沿海用户群体的利益相关者参与来评估社区观念。结果表明,河流和河口的改造改变了泥沙通量路径,导致邻近海滩的泥沙不足,加剧了海岸线的不稳定性。相反,利益相关者对侵蚀驱动因素的看法主要是由可见的海岸干预(如硬工程结构和大规模开发)形成的,而上游沉积过程仍未得到充分认识。测量沉积物动态和公众理解之间的不匹配影响了管理偏好,通常倾向于反应性的、特定地点的工程解决方案,而不是整体策略。通过将物理沉积物证据与社区观念联系起来,该研究展示了科学知识和社会解释之间的差距如何破坏海岸管理干预措施的有效性和合法性。研究结果强调,需要采用综合的、从源到汇的治理方法,使沉积物管理战略与利益相关者的意识和参与保持一致。该框架为快速发展的季风主导、数据有限的沿海系统的侵蚀管理提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regional Studies in Marine Science
Regional Studies in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
336
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE will publish scientifically sound papers on regional aspects of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, coastal zones, continental shelf, the seas and oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书