Artificial intelligence-powered H&E-based quantification of spatial tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte distribution identifies prognostic immune niches in colorectal cancer.

IF 5.1
Hyun-Hee Koh, Seungeun Lee, Chiyoon Oum, Sanghoon Song, Soo Ick Cho, Sérgio Pereira, Chang Ho Ahn, Jun Yong Kim, Milim Kim, Minsun Jung
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-powered H&E-based quantification of spatial tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte distribution identifies prognostic immune niches in colorectal cancer.","authors":"Hyun-Hee Koh, Seungeun Lee, Chiyoon Oum, Sanghoon Song, Soo Ick Cho, Sérgio Pereira, Chang Ho Ahn, Jun Yong Kim, Milim Kim, Minsun Jung","doi":"10.1007/s00262-026-04409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established; however, existing approaches inadequately capture their spatial distribution. We investigated the prognostic implications of TIL spatial distribution in CRC using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 202 patients with stage II-III CRC were included. TIL densities in intratumoral (iTIL) and stromal (sTIL) regions were quantified using AI-based analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained images. Based on proximity to the tumor-stromal border (TSB), TILs were subclassified into core iTIL, bounding iTIL, bounding sTIL, and outermost sTIL. Immunoscore was calculated from CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell densities in the tumor center and invasive margin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations between AI-based and pathologist assessments (iTIL: r = 0.57; sTIL: r = 0.70) were comparable to inter-pathologist correlations (iTIL: r = 0.47; sTIL: r = 0.70). In univariate Cox regression analysis, bounding iTIL, bounding sTIL, and outermost sTIL were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), whereas core iTIL was not. Composite TIL and TSB scores were developed by incorporating the prognostically significant regions. In multivariable analysis, the TIL score (p = 0.001), TSB score (p < 0.001), and Immunoscore (p < 0.001) independently predicted RFS. In microsatellite instability-high tumors, only the TSB score remained prognostically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-powered spatial analysis of TILs, particularly the TSB score, demonstrated prognostic performance comparable to conventional Immunoscore, thereby supporting the value of spatial immune profiling and AI-driven analysis of H&E-stained slides for improved risk stratification in CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":"75 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13139513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04409-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established; however, existing approaches inadequately capture their spatial distribution. We investigated the prognostic implications of TIL spatial distribution in CRC using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method.

Methods: A total of 202 patients with stage II-III CRC were included. TIL densities in intratumoral (iTIL) and stromal (sTIL) regions were quantified using AI-based analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained images. Based on proximity to the tumor-stromal border (TSB), TILs were subclassified into core iTIL, bounding iTIL, bounding sTIL, and outermost sTIL. Immunoscore was calculated from CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities in the tumor center and invasive margin.

Results: Correlations between AI-based and pathologist assessments (iTIL: r = 0.57; sTIL: r = 0.70) were comparable to inter-pathologist correlations (iTIL: r = 0.47; sTIL: r = 0.70). In univariate Cox regression analysis, bounding iTIL, bounding sTIL, and outermost sTIL were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), whereas core iTIL was not. Composite TIL and TSB scores were developed by incorporating the prognostically significant regions. In multivariable analysis, the TIL score (p = 0.001), TSB score (p < 0.001), and Immunoscore (p < 0.001) independently predicted RFS. In microsatellite instability-high tumors, only the TSB score remained prognostically significant.

Conclusion: AI-powered spatial analysis of TILs, particularly the TSB score, demonstrated prognostic performance comparable to conventional Immunoscore, thereby supporting the value of spatial immune profiling and AI-driven analysis of H&E-stained slides for improved risk stratification in CRC.

基于人工智能的空间肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞分布定量识别结直肠癌的预后免疫龛。
目的:肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(tumor-浸润淋巴细胞,til)在结直肠癌(colorectal cancer, CRC)预后中的意义已得到明确;然而,现有的方法不能充分捕捉它们的空间分布。我们使用基于人工智能(AI)的方法研究了TIL空间分布在结直肠癌中的预后意义。方法:共纳入202例II-III期结直肠癌患者。采用基于人工智能的苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色图像分析,定量肿瘤内(iTIL)和间质(sTIL)区域TIL密度。根据与肿瘤间质边界(TSB)的接近程度,将til分为核心iTIL、边界iTIL、边界sTIL和最外层sTIL。免疫评分由肿瘤中心和浸润边缘的CD3+和CD8+ t细胞密度计算。结果:人工智能与病理评估之间的相关性(iTIL: r = 0.57; sTIL: r = 0.70)与病理间相关性(iTIL: r = 0.47; sTIL: r = 0.70)相当。在单变量Cox回归分析中,边界iTIL、边界sTIL和最外侧sTIL与无复发生存率(RFS)显著相关,而核心iTIL则无显著相关。综合TIL和TSB评分纳入预后显著区域。在多变量分析中,TIL评分(p = 0.001), TSB评分(p)。结论:人工智能驱动的TILs空间分析,特别是TSB评分,显示出与传统免疫评分相当的预后表现,从而支持空间免疫谱分析和人工智能驱动的h&e染色切片分析对改善CRC风险分层的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书