Sarah M Kodres-O'Brien, Mackenzie Koellermeier, Nayan Shah, Peter Langenstroer
{"title":"Management of retained bullet fragments from posterior urethra after gunshot wound: a case report.","authors":"Sarah M Kodres-O'Brien, Mackenzie Koellermeier, Nayan Shah, Peter Langenstroer","doi":"10.32604/cju.2025.069550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained bullet fragments in the genitourinary tract following gunshot wound is rare and require removal.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>We present the case of a retained bullet in the prostate following a gunshot wound to the pelvis, which was endoscopically removed. A urethral catheter and suprapubic tube were placed. The patient then had migration of a second bullet fragment into the prostatic urethra six weeks later, requiring open removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case shows that several approaches can be considered to remove retained bullet fragments from the urinary tract. Furthermore, access to the bladder via a suprapubic tube can be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":520500,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of urology","volume":"33 2","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.069550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Retained bullet fragments in the genitourinary tract following gunshot wound is rare and require removal.
Case description: We present the case of a retained bullet in the prostate following a gunshot wound to the pelvis, which was endoscopically removed. A urethral catheter and suprapubic tube were placed. The patient then had migration of a second bullet fragment into the prostatic urethra six weeks later, requiring open removal.
Conclusions: This case shows that several approaches can be considered to remove retained bullet fragments from the urinary tract. Furthermore, access to the bladder via a suprapubic tube can be beneficial.