RETURN Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Adult Routine Dental Visits.

IF 5.9
R V Harris, V Lowers, J Green, R Kirby, J Hennessy, J E Clarkson, G Burnside
{"title":"RETURN Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Adult Routine Dental Visits.","authors":"R V Harris, V Lowers, J Green, R Kirby, J Hennessy, J E Clarkson, G Burnside","doi":"10.1177/00220345261425929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Groups with low socioeconomic status are less likely to make planned dental visits even though routine attenders have fewer caries and less tooth loss. Because behavioral interventions positioned in urgent dental care may improve health and inequalities, RETURN, which involved a nurse conversation supported by videos, booklets, and goal/action-plan setting, was developed. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the RETURN intervention at increasing planned dental visits and lessening the oral health impact. Adults attending 14 National Health Service urgent dental services were recruited to a randomized controlled trial and followed up after 6, 12, and 18 mo. Co-primary outcomes were (1) planned visits at 12 mo as measured by Business Services Authority (BSA) data and (2) Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) summary score at 12 mo adjusted for baseline. Of the 1,176 consenting adults who were randomized, 591 were allocated to the RETURN group. More than half (55.2%, 315 intervention; 54.7%, 310 control) lived in the lowest Index Multiple Deprivation decile. RETURN participants had a 20% greater odds of planned care as recorded by the BSA at 12 mo (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 97.5% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86, 1.70; <i>P</i> = 0.217). There was a reduction (improvement) in OHIP scores at 12 mo in both groups (RETURN group, mean = -7.4, standard deviation [SD] = 12.9; control group, mean = -6.2, SD = 12.9). The least squares mean of the RETURN Modified Dental Anxiety Score decreased with time (anxiety improved) whereas it increased (worsened) in the control group (Modified Dental Anxiety Scale time and treatment group interaction = -0.01; CI = -0.03, 0.00; <i>P</i> = 0.027). RETURN participants had a more than 3 times greater odds of attempting to make an appointment, with the treatment effect increasing with time (at 18 mo: OR = 3.39; 95% CI = 1.83, 6.27; <i>P</i> = 0.0001). We are moderately certain RETURN produced small, consistently favorable effects on routine visits, oral health impact, and dental anxiety despite limited-service availability. RETURN also significantly increased attempts to make routine appointments even in a disadvantaged cohort. This supports integrating behavioral support alongside service reforms to support the transition into continuing care and the optimum use of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental research","volume":" ","pages":"220345261425929"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345261425929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groups with low socioeconomic status are less likely to make planned dental visits even though routine attenders have fewer caries and less tooth loss. Because behavioral interventions positioned in urgent dental care may improve health and inequalities, RETURN, which involved a nurse conversation supported by videos, booklets, and goal/action-plan setting, was developed. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the RETURN intervention at increasing planned dental visits and lessening the oral health impact. Adults attending 14 National Health Service urgent dental services were recruited to a randomized controlled trial and followed up after 6, 12, and 18 mo. Co-primary outcomes were (1) planned visits at 12 mo as measured by Business Services Authority (BSA) data and (2) Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) summary score at 12 mo adjusted for baseline. Of the 1,176 consenting adults who were randomized, 591 were allocated to the RETURN group. More than half (55.2%, 315 intervention; 54.7%, 310 control) lived in the lowest Index Multiple Deprivation decile. RETURN participants had a 20% greater odds of planned care as recorded by the BSA at 12 mo (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 97.5% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86, 1.70; P = 0.217). There was a reduction (improvement) in OHIP scores at 12 mo in both groups (RETURN group, mean = -7.4, standard deviation [SD] = 12.9; control group, mean = -6.2, SD = 12.9). The least squares mean of the RETURN Modified Dental Anxiety Score decreased with time (anxiety improved) whereas it increased (worsened) in the control group (Modified Dental Anxiety Scale time and treatment group interaction = -0.01; CI = -0.03, 0.00; P = 0.027). RETURN participants had a more than 3 times greater odds of attempting to make an appointment, with the treatment effect increasing with time (at 18 mo: OR = 3.39; 95% CI = 1.83, 6.27; P = 0.0001). We are moderately certain RETURN produced small, consistently favorable effects on routine visits, oral health impact, and dental anxiety despite limited-service availability. RETURN also significantly increased attempts to make routine appointments even in a disadvantaged cohort. This supports integrating behavioral support alongside service reforms to support the transition into continuing care and the optimum use of resources.

增加成人常规牙科就诊的随机对照试验。
社会经济地位较低的群体不太可能进行有计划的牙科检查,即使定期就诊的人龋齿和牙齿脱落的情况较少。由于紧急牙科护理中的行为干预措施可以改善健康和不平等现象,因此开发了“回归”,其中包括由视频、小册子和目标/行动计划制定支持的护士对话。本研究的目的是调查回归干预在增加计划牙科就诊和减少口腔健康影响方面的有效性。参加14个国家卫生服务紧急牙科服务的成年人被招募到一项随机对照试验中,并在6、12和18个月后进行随访。共同主要结果是(1)12个月的计划就诊,由商业服务管理局(BSA)数据测量,(2)12个月的口腔健康影响概况(OHIP)总结评分调整为基线。在1176名同意的成年人中,591人被分配到RETURN组。超过一半(55.2%,315例干预;54.7%,310例对照)生活在最低指数多重剥夺十分位数。根据12个月时的BSA记录,回归组参与者获得计划护理的几率高出20%(优势比[OR] = 1.21; 97.5%可信区间[CI] = 0.86, 1.70; P = 0.217)。两组患者12月时OHIP评分均有降低(改善)(RETURN组,均值= -7.4,标准差[SD] = 12.9;对照组,均值= -6.2,SD = 12.9)。改良牙科焦虑量表时间与治疗组交互作用= -0.01,CI = -0.03, 0.00, P = 0.027,对照组最小二乘均值随时间降低(焦虑改善),最小二乘均值随时间升高(焦虑加重)。回归组患者尝试预约的几率是对照组的3倍多,治疗效果随着时间的推移而增加(18个月时:OR = 3.39; 95% CI = 1.83, 6.27; P = 0.0001)。我们可以适度肯定,尽管服务有限,但复诊对常规就诊、口腔健康影响和牙科焦虑产生了小而持续的有利影响。即使在弱势群体中,RETURN也显著增加了常规预约的尝试。这有助于将行为支持与服务改革结合起来,以支持向持续护理和资源的最佳利用过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书