Online support and co-rumination experiences among adults in substance use recovery.

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xiangyu Tao, María E Contreras Pérez, Arielle Estes, Vincent DiGioia-Laird, Margaret Swarbrick, Kristina Jackson
{"title":"Online support and co-rumination experiences among adults in substance use recovery.","authors":"Xiangyu Tao, María E Contreras Pérez, Arielle Estes, Vincent DiGioia-Laird, Margaret Swarbrick, Kristina Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2026.210007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined patterns of perceived social support and co-rumination (e.g., repeatedly discussing problems) in social media recovery groups and associated whole-person wellness among adults in recovery from substance use disorder (SUD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey (n = 468) was conducted in collaboration with a Community Advisory Board (CAB). The CAB reviewed and refined the survey, led recruitment, interpreted results, and co-authored this manuscript. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified subgroups based on four online social support domains and three co-rumination domains. Differences were tested in eight wellness dimensions across profiles, adjusting for demographics and engagement frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four profiles emerged: Low Support-Low Co-rumination, Moderate Support-Moderate Co-rumination, High Support-Minimal Co-rumination, and Very High Support-High Co-rumination. Support and co-rumination consistently co-occurred, and in most profiles, their levels aligned. Both high-support profiles reported higher wellness across all dimensions than the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-quality perceived support, whether paired with minimal or frequent co-rumination, was linked to greater engagement in wellness behaviors, challenging the view of co-rumination as uniformly maladaptive. Findings underscore the value of moving beyond abstinence-focused metrics toward outcomes that capture connection, purpose, and quality of life. Intentionally designed online recovery spaces that foster multidimensional support can harness co-rumination as a constructive force for sustaining recovery and promoting holistic wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":" ","pages":"210007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2026.210007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined patterns of perceived social support and co-rumination (e.g., repeatedly discussing problems) in social media recovery groups and associated whole-person wellness among adults in recovery from substance use disorder (SUD).

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (n = 468) was conducted in collaboration with a Community Advisory Board (CAB). The CAB reviewed and refined the survey, led recruitment, interpreted results, and co-authored this manuscript. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified subgroups based on four online social support domains and three co-rumination domains. Differences were tested in eight wellness dimensions across profiles, adjusting for demographics and engagement frequency.

Results: Four profiles emerged: Low Support-Low Co-rumination, Moderate Support-Moderate Co-rumination, High Support-Minimal Co-rumination, and Very High Support-High Co-rumination. Support and co-rumination consistently co-occurred, and in most profiles, their levels aligned. Both high-support profiles reported higher wellness across all dimensions than the other groups.

Conclusions: High-quality perceived support, whether paired with minimal or frequent co-rumination, was linked to greater engagement in wellness behaviors, challenging the view of co-rumination as uniformly maladaptive. Findings underscore the value of moving beyond abstinence-focused metrics toward outcomes that capture connection, purpose, and quality of life. Intentionally designed online recovery spaces that foster multidimensional support can harness co-rumination as a constructive force for sustaining recovery and promoting holistic wellness.

成人药物使用康复中的在线支持和共同反思经验。
目的:本研究考察了物质使用障碍(SUD)康复成人在社交媒体康复小组中感知到的社会支持和共同反思模式(如反复讨论问题)以及相关的整体健康。方法:与社区咨询委员会(CAB)合作进行横断面在线调查(n = 468)。CAB审查并完善了调查,领导了招募,解释了结果,并共同撰写了这份手稿。潜在特征分析(LPA)基于四个在线社会支持域和三个共同反刍域确定了子群体。研究人员根据人口统计数据和参与频率进行了调整,测试了8个健康维度的差异。结果:出现了四种情况:低支持-低共同反刍,中等支持-中等共同反刍,高支持-最小共同反刍,以及非常高支持-高共同反刍。支持和共同思考始终同时发生,并且在大多数情况下,它们的水平是一致的。两组高支持的人在所有方面都比其他组更健康。结论:高质量的感知支持,无论是与少量或频繁的共同反刍相结合,都与更大程度的健康行为有关,挑战了共同反刍是一致的适应不良的观点。研究结果强调了超越以禁欲为中心的指标,转向捕捉联系、目的和生活质量的结果的价值。有意设计的在线康复空间可以促进多维支持,利用共同沉思作为维持康复和促进整体健康的建设性力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书