Reduction of simultaneous ordering rate of high sensitivity C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in a veteran affairs healthcare system.

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1729117
Luke Valencia
{"title":"Reduction of simultaneous ordering rate of high sensitivity C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in a veteran affairs healthcare system.","authors":"Luke Valencia","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1729117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is widely recognized that the ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) and hs-CRP (C-Reactive Protein) are comparable inflammatory markers. In this reported veteran population, there is a significant correlation between the two assays. The simultaneous ordering of ESR and hs-CRP for evaluation of acute inflammation is unnecessary and wasteful. Various hospitals have implemented processes to reduce co-ordering habits through best practice advisories (BPAs) and/or educational interventions. In this retrospective study spanning twelve months, the Northern California Veteran Affairs Hospital System had a co-ordering rate of approximately 72% (number of hs-CRP orders with a co-ordered ESR compared to the total number of hs-CRP orders). After implementing a best practice ordering advisory and providing education to the clinical teams, there was a significant decrease in co-ordering of the assays (-34%, <i>p</i>-value = 0.00036). There was also a significant decrease in standalone ESR ordering and standalone hs-CRP ordering (<i>p</i>-value = 0.0003 and 0.0042, respectively). Departments receiving both interventions, an ordering advisory and education, had the largest decrease in co-ordering habits, the largest decrease seen being more than 56%. Proper implementation of ordering advisories paired with education results in better test utilization and lower co-ordering rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1729117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13144006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1729117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely recognized that the ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) and hs-CRP (C-Reactive Protein) are comparable inflammatory markers. In this reported veteran population, there is a significant correlation between the two assays. The simultaneous ordering of ESR and hs-CRP for evaluation of acute inflammation is unnecessary and wasteful. Various hospitals have implemented processes to reduce co-ordering habits through best practice advisories (BPAs) and/or educational interventions. In this retrospective study spanning twelve months, the Northern California Veteran Affairs Hospital System had a co-ordering rate of approximately 72% (number of hs-CRP orders with a co-ordered ESR compared to the total number of hs-CRP orders). After implementing a best practice ordering advisory and providing education to the clinical teams, there was a significant decrease in co-ordering of the assays (-34%, p-value = 0.00036). There was also a significant decrease in standalone ESR ordering and standalone hs-CRP ordering (p-value = 0.0003 and 0.0042, respectively). Departments receiving both interventions, an ordering advisory and education, had the largest decrease in co-ordering habits, the largest decrease seen being more than 56%. Proper implementation of ordering advisories paired with education results in better test utilization and lower co-ordering rates.

降低退伍军人医疗保健系统中高敏c反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率的同时订购率。
人们普遍认为,ESR(红细胞沉降率)和hs-CRP (c反应蛋白)是可比较的炎症标志物。在这个报告的退伍军人人群中,两种分析之间存在显著的相关性。同时订购ESR和hs-CRP来评估急性炎症是不必要和浪费的。各医院已实施流程,通过最佳实践咨询和/或教育干预措施来减少共同订购习惯。在这项为期12个月的回顾性研究中,北加州退伍军人事务医院系统的共订率约为72%(共订ESR的hs-CRP订单数量与hs-CRP订单总数相比)。在实施最佳实践排序咨询并向临床团队提供教育后,检测共排序显著减少(-34%,p值= 0.00036)。独立ESR排序和独立hs-CRP排序也显著降低(p值分别为0.0003和0.0042)。同时接受点菜咨询和教育这两种干预措施的部门,共同点餐习惯的降幅最大,降幅超过56%。适当实施排序通知与教育相结合,可以提高考试利用率,降低协同排序率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书