Prison Abolition: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis With Implications for Nursing.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kendra Birnley, Dena Hassouneh
{"title":"Prison Abolition: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis With Implications for Nursing.","authors":"Kendra Birnley, Dena Hassouneh","doi":"10.1111/jan.70635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To clarify the concept of prison abolition in the context of United States mass incarceration and to discuss its implications for nursing ethics, knowledge production, and practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A critical literature review using Rodger's evolutionary concept analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We coded and thematically analysed sources to identify associated terms, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of prison abolition.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched six databases and a book catalogue between May 2024 and April 2025 to yield a sample of 30 interdisciplinary academic texts. No date limits were set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified nine attributes: Counterhegemonic, Recognizing Carceral Harm and Failure, New Public Discourse, Incremental, Culture of Care, Equitable Justice, Elimination Not Reform, Evolving, and Grassroots with consistent interdisciplinary and temporal characterization. There is a relative absence of this concept in nursing literature even though it addresses health concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prison abolition aligns with the American Nursing Association's Nursing Code of Ethics and could inform and guide nurses toward improvements in health equity.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession: </strong>Nursing in the United States has not engaged with abolition as much as other disciplines, but our Code of Ethics compels us to. Prison abolition is concerned with health equity, and marginalized populations could benefit if we incorporate the concept into our practice, scholarship, and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This review addressed a potential lack of understanding or awareness of the concept of prison abolition within nursing discourse. The main finding is that this concept aligns with U.S. nursing ethics. This research may impact nurses looking to incorporate a theory and practice to improve approaches to health equity.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>We were unable to find an EQUATOR reporting method for concept analyses.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To clarify the concept of prison abolition in the context of United States mass incarceration and to discuss its implications for nursing ethics, knowledge production, and practice.

Design: A critical literature review using Rodger's evolutionary concept analysis.

Methods: We coded and thematically analysed sources to identify associated terms, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of prison abolition.

Data sources: We searched six databases and a book catalogue between May 2024 and April 2025 to yield a sample of 30 interdisciplinary academic texts. No date limits were set.

Results: We identified nine attributes: Counterhegemonic, Recognizing Carceral Harm and Failure, New Public Discourse, Incremental, Culture of Care, Equitable Justice, Elimination Not Reform, Evolving, and Grassroots with consistent interdisciplinary and temporal characterization. There is a relative absence of this concept in nursing literature even though it addresses health concerns.

Conclusion: Prison abolition aligns with the American Nursing Association's Nursing Code of Ethics and could inform and guide nurses toward improvements in health equity.

Implications for the profession: Nursing in the United States has not engaged with abolition as much as other disciplines, but our Code of Ethics compels us to. Prison abolition is concerned with health equity, and marginalized populations could benefit if we incorporate the concept into our practice, scholarship, and advocacy.

Impact: This review addressed a potential lack of understanding or awareness of the concept of prison abolition within nursing discourse. The main finding is that this concept aligns with U.S. nursing ethics. This research may impact nurses looking to incorporate a theory and practice to improve approaches to health equity.

Reporting method: We were unable to find an EQUATOR reporting method for concept analyses.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

废除监狱:一个进化的概念分析与启示护理。
目的:阐明在美国大规模监禁的背景下废除监狱的概念,并讨论其对护理伦理、知识生产和实践的影响。设计:使用罗杰的进化概念分析的批判性文献综述。方法:我们对来源进行编码和主题分析,以确定废除监狱概念的相关术语、属性、前因和后果。数据来源:我们在2024年5月至2025年4月期间检索了6个数据库和一个图书目录,以产生30个跨学科学术文本的样本。没有设定日期限制。结果:我们确定了九个属性:反霸权,认识到癌症的伤害和失败,新的公共话语,增量,关怀文化,公平正义,消除而不是改革,演变,以及具有一致的跨学科和时间特征的基层。在护理文献中相对缺乏这一概念,尽管它解决了健康问题。结论:废除监狱符合美国护理协会的护理道德准则,可以告知和指导护士改善健康公平。对职业的影响:美国的护理没有像其他学科那样致力于废除,但我们的道德准则迫使我们这样做。废除监狱关系到卫生公平,如果我们将这一概念纳入我们的实践、学术研究和宣传中,边缘化人群就会受益。影响:本综述解决了护理话语中对废除监狱概念缺乏理解或认识的潜在问题。主要的发现是,这个概念与美国的护理伦理是一致的。这项研究可能会影响护士寻求将理论和实践结合起来,以改善卫生公平的方法。报告方法:我们无法找到用于概念分析的EQUATOR报告方法。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书