Five-year tomographic and clinical evaluation of the socket shield technique: Case report.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Renan Dalla, Khalila C Cotrim, Rafael A Siqueira, Eduardo C Kalil
{"title":"Five-year tomographic and clinical evaluation of the socket shield technique: Case report.","authors":"Renan Dalla, Khalila C Cotrim, Rafael A Siqueira, Eduardo C Kalil","doi":"10.1002/cap.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The socket shield technique, one modality of partial extraction therapy, aims to preserve periodontal tissues and maintain the buccal alveolar bone volume following immediate implant placement or in prosthetic pontic sites, by the strategic maintenance of a tooth root fragment. This case report presents a 5 year-follow up of this technique, in a full maxillary implant-supported rehabilitation, evaluating the alveolar dimensional changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 54-year-old patient underwent a full maxillary implant-supported rehabilitation. Partial tooth extraction was performed on the five anterior sites, numbers 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11. In each site where the socket shield technique was performed, changes in alveolar dimensions at the cervical, middle, and apical levels were measured using computed tomography at baseline, 1, 3, and 5-year follow-up intervals. In addition, the Pink Esthetic Score evaluation was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values (mm) in the five evaluated sites, at each time period, were respectively: cervical = 7.92 ± 0.46; 8.38 ± 0.61; 8.28 ± 0.51; and 8.32 ± 0.47. Medium third = 7.84 ± 0.99; 8.18 ± 1.05; 7.22 ± 0.69; 7.24 ± 0.72. Apical = 6.84 ± 0.91; 6.88 ± 0.74; 6.40 ± 0.70; 6.40 ± 0.69.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite its inherent limitations, this case report suggests that the socket shield technique can represent a promising alternative for the stability of peri-implant tissues, in pontic and implant sites.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>In this case report, the socket shield technique was able to preserve alveolar dimension in both implant and pontic sites at 5-year follow-up. Careful planning and execution are crucial to prevent interference between retained root fragments and prosthetic components. Patient satisfaction and favorable Pink Esthetic Scores demonstrated good esthetic outcomes with this technique.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Preserving bone and soft tissue volume and position after tooth extraction is a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly in anterior sites. This case report illustrates the five-year follow-up of a patient who received a full-arch, implant-supported rehabilitation in the upper jaw using the socket shield technique. This approach preserves a portion of the tooth root to help maintain the natural contour of bone and soft tissues. Clinical and tomographic evaluations, along with esthetic scoring systems, were used to assess tissue stability and appearance over time. In this case report, after five years, the technique showed stable preservation of bone and gingival tissues, with favorable esthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Although based on a single case, these findings suggest that the socket shield technique may be a useful option for achieving long-term tissue stability and esthetic success in challenging implant-supported rehabilitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The socket shield technique, one modality of partial extraction therapy, aims to preserve periodontal tissues and maintain the buccal alveolar bone volume following immediate implant placement or in prosthetic pontic sites, by the strategic maintenance of a tooth root fragment. This case report presents a 5 year-follow up of this technique, in a full maxillary implant-supported rehabilitation, evaluating the alveolar dimensional changes over time.

Methods: A 54-year-old patient underwent a full maxillary implant-supported rehabilitation. Partial tooth extraction was performed on the five anterior sites, numbers 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11. In each site where the socket shield technique was performed, changes in alveolar dimensions at the cervical, middle, and apical levels were measured using computed tomography at baseline, 1, 3, and 5-year follow-up intervals. In addition, the Pink Esthetic Score evaluation was performed.

Results: The mean values (mm) in the five evaluated sites, at each time period, were respectively: cervical = 7.92 ± 0.46; 8.38 ± 0.61; 8.28 ± 0.51; and 8.32 ± 0.47. Medium third = 7.84 ± 0.99; 8.18 ± 1.05; 7.22 ± 0.69; 7.24 ± 0.72. Apical = 6.84 ± 0.91; 6.88 ± 0.74; 6.40 ± 0.70; 6.40 ± 0.69.

Conclusion: Despite its inherent limitations, this case report suggests that the socket shield technique can represent a promising alternative for the stability of peri-implant tissues, in pontic and implant sites.

Key points: In this case report, the socket shield technique was able to preserve alveolar dimension in both implant and pontic sites at 5-year follow-up. Careful planning and execution are crucial to prevent interference between retained root fragments and prosthetic components. Patient satisfaction and favorable Pink Esthetic Scores demonstrated good esthetic outcomes with this technique.

Plain language summary: Preserving bone and soft tissue volume and position after tooth extraction is a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly in anterior sites. This case report illustrates the five-year follow-up of a patient who received a full-arch, implant-supported rehabilitation in the upper jaw using the socket shield technique. This approach preserves a portion of the tooth root to help maintain the natural contour of bone and soft tissues. Clinical and tomographic evaluations, along with esthetic scoring systems, were used to assess tissue stability and appearance over time. In this case report, after five years, the technique showed stable preservation of bone and gingival tissues, with favorable esthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Although based on a single case, these findings suggest that the socket shield technique may be a useful option for achieving long-term tissue stability and esthetic success in challenging implant-supported rehabilitations.

颅脑窝屏蔽技术的5年断层摄影和临床评价:1例报告。
背景:牙槽屏蔽技术是部分拔牙治疗的一种方式,其目的是通过对牙根碎片的策略性维护,保护牙周组织,并在立即植入种植体或假桥部位维持颊槽骨体积。本病例报告对该技术进行了为期5年的随访,在全颌种植体支持的康复中,评估了牙槽骨尺寸随时间的变化。方法:一位54岁的患者接受了上颌种植体支持的全康复治疗。在6、8、9、10和11个前牙位置进行部分拔牙。在每一个进行骨臼屏蔽术的部位,在基线、1、3和5年随访间隔时,使用计算机断层扫描测量颈椎、中部和根尖水平的肺泡尺寸变化。此外,还进行了粉红色审美评分评估。结果:5个评估部位各时间段的平均值(mm)分别为:宫颈= 7.92±0.46;8.38±0.61;8.28±0.51;8.32±0.47。中三分之一= 7.84±0.99;8.18±1.05;7.22±0.69;7.24±0.72。根尖= 6.84±0.91;6.88±0.74;6.40±0.70;6.40±0.69。结论:尽管有其固有的局限性,但本病例报告表明,在桥体和种植体部位,套管保护技术可以代表一种有希望的种植体周围组织稳定性的替代方法。关键点:在本病例报告中,在5年的随访中,套窝屏蔽技术能够保持种植体和桥体部位的牙槽尺寸。仔细的计划和执行是至关重要的,以防止保留的根碎片和假体部件之间的干扰。患者满意度和良好的粉红色美学评分表明该技术具有良好的美学效果。简单的语言总结:在拔牙后保留骨和软组织的体积和位置是种植牙科的主要挑战,特别是在前牙位。本病例报告描述了一个患者接受全弓,种植体支持的康复在上颌使用窝盾技术的五年随访。这种方法保留了一部分牙根,以帮助维持骨骼和软组织的自然轮廓。临床和断层扫描评估,以及美学评分系统,用于评估组织稳定性和外观随时间的变化。在这个病例报告中,5年后,该技术显示了稳定的骨和牙龈组织保存,具有良好的美学效果和很高的患者满意度。虽然仅基于一个病例,但这些研究结果表明,在具有挑战性的种植体支持康复中,套窝保护技术可能是实现长期组织稳定性和美学成功的有用选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书