Comparison of Antero-Posterior versus Posterio-Anterior Screw Fixation Techniques in Bryan-Morrey Type 4 Capitellum Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Murat Onder, Manuel Kramer, Melisa Ercan, Abdurrahman Aydın, Gökhan Pehlıvanoglu, Kutalmıs Albayrak
{"title":"Comparison of Antero-Posterior versus Posterio-Anterior Screw Fixation Techniques in Bryan-Morrey Type 4 Capitellum Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Murat Onder, Manuel Kramer, Melisa Ercan, Abdurrahman Aydın, Gökhan Pehlıvanoglu, Kutalmıs Albayrak","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures present unique challenges for screw fixation due to their medial extension. Although both anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) screw orientations have been described, their clinical outcomes have not yet been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients with Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures treated with headless compression screws were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into AP (n = 12) and PA (n = 9) groups based on screw orientation according to the treating surgeon's preference. Primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Secondary outcomes included range of motion, screw angular parameters, analgesic duration, fluoroscopy count, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved excellent functional outcomes with no significant difference in MEPI scores (AP: 87.9 ± 7.8 vs. PA: 90.6 ± 5.8; P = .274). The PA group showed reduced postoperative analgesic duration (6.7 ± 2.2 vs. 14.1 ± 3.5 days; P < .001), lower fluoroscopy exposure (5.6 ± 1.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.1 images; P = .005), and more parallel screw orientation (9.3 ° ± 1.6 ° vs. 16.8 ° ± 7.1 °; P < .001). Although the complication rate trended lower in the PA group (11.1% vs. 41.7%; P = .178), this difference was not statistically significant. Olecranon fossa penetration and transient neuropraxia occurred exclusively in the AP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AP and PA screw fixation techniques achieved excellent functional outcomes in Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures. The PA technique demonstrated perioperative advantages including reduced analgesic requirements and lower fluoroscopy exposure. These exploratory findings suggest that the PA technique appears promising, but confirmation in larger prospective studies is warranted.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; Retrospective Comparative Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures present unique challenges for screw fixation due to their medial extension. Although both anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) screw orientations have been described, their clinical outcomes have not yet been directly compared.

Methods: Twenty-one patients with Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures treated with headless compression screws were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into AP (n = 12) and PA (n = 9) groups based on screw orientation according to the treating surgeon's preference. Primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Secondary outcomes included range of motion, screw angular parameters, analgesic duration, fluoroscopy count, and complications.

Results: Both groups achieved excellent functional outcomes with no significant difference in MEPI scores (AP: 87.9 ± 7.8 vs. PA: 90.6 ± 5.8; P = .274). The PA group showed reduced postoperative analgesic duration (6.7 ± 2.2 vs. 14.1 ± 3.5 days; P < .001), lower fluoroscopy exposure (5.6 ± 1.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.1 images; P = .005), and more parallel screw orientation (9.3 ° ± 1.6 ° vs. 16.8 ° ± 7.1 °; P < .001). Although the complication rate trended lower in the PA group (11.1% vs. 41.7%; P = .178), this difference was not statistically significant. Olecranon fossa penetration and transient neuropraxia occurred exclusively in the AP group.

Conclusion: Both AP and PA screw fixation techniques achieved excellent functional outcomes in Bryan-Morrey Type 4 capitellum fractures. The PA technique demonstrated perioperative advantages including reduced analgesic requirements and lower fluoroscopy exposure. These exploratory findings suggest that the PA technique appears promising, but confirmation in larger prospective studies is warranted.

Level of evidence: III; Retrospective Comparative Study.

Bryan-Morrey 4型小头骨折前后螺钉固定技术与前后螺钉固定技术的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:Bryan-Morrey型4型肱骨小头骨折由于其内侧延伸,对螺钉固定提出了独特的挑战。虽然前后位螺钉(AP)和后前位螺钉(PA)的定位都有描述,但它们的临床结果尚未直接比较。方法:回顾性分析21例应用无头加压螺钉治疗Bryan-Morrey型4型肱骨小头骨折的病例。根据治疗术者的喜好,将患者根据螺钉的定位分为AP组(n = 12)和PA组(n = 9)。主要观察指标为Mayo肘部运动指数(MEPI)。次要结果包括活动范围、螺钉角度参数、镇痛持续时间、透视计数和并发症。结果:两组功能预后均良好,MEPI评分差异无统计学意义(AP: 87.9±7.8 vs. PA: 90.6±5.8;P = 0.274)。PA组术后镇痛时间缩短(6.7±2.2天和14.1±3.5天);P结论:AP和PA螺钉固定技术在Bryan-Morrey 4型小头骨折中均获得了良好的功能效果。PA技术表现出围手术期的优势,包括减少止痛需求和更低的透视暴露。这些探索性发现表明,PA技术似乎很有希望,但需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中得到证实。证据等级:III;回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书