Cultural Adaptation of the Workplace Age-Friendliness Measure to German with Validation in Austrian Organizations.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Gert Lang, Raphael Eppler-Hattab
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation of the Workplace Age-Friendliness Measure to German with Validation in Austrian Organizations.","authors":"Gert Lang, Raphael Eppler-Hattab","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnag082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The workplace age-friendliness measure is a multidimensional, four-factor instrument measuring organizational support for maintaining the employability of older workers that was developed in English and Hebrew. This study aimed to adapt it culturally for use in organizations where German is spoken, and to validate its psychometric properties in the context of workplace health promotion initiatives.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The English version of the scale was cross-translated into German and piloted in a convenience sample in Austria. It was then circulated in six Austrian organizations across various industries and regions, mostly from health and education sectors, within their workplace health promotion projects, resulting in 1,725 employee responses. This sample was used to report on and validate the scale's psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated construct validity and measurement equivalence across multigroup socio-demographic variables of age, gender, and education. The results also supported the four-factor solution of the construct, with acceptable internal consistency and reliability. Correlations demonstrated the criterion (concurrent) validity of the scale with related constructs. An analysis of variance revealed meaningful differences in factor mean scores across individual and organizational characteristics.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This is the first study to develop and validate a German-language version of the workplace age-friendliness measure. As a reliable and valid instrument, it can be used to assess organizations' practices regarding their support for an aging workforce. Further implications and limitations of using this instrument in future empirical research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The workplace age-friendliness measure is a multidimensional, four-factor instrument measuring organizational support for maintaining the employability of older workers that was developed in English and Hebrew. This study aimed to adapt it culturally for use in organizations where German is spoken, and to validate its psychometric properties in the context of workplace health promotion initiatives.

Research design and methods: The English version of the scale was cross-translated into German and piloted in a convenience sample in Austria. It was then circulated in six Austrian organizations across various industries and regions, mostly from health and education sectors, within their workplace health promotion projects, resulting in 1,725 employee responses. This sample was used to report on and validate the scale's psychometric properties.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated construct validity and measurement equivalence across multigroup socio-demographic variables of age, gender, and education. The results also supported the four-factor solution of the construct, with acceptable internal consistency and reliability. Correlations demonstrated the criterion (concurrent) validity of the scale with related constructs. An analysis of variance revealed meaningful differences in factor mean scores across individual and organizational characteristics.

Discussion and implications: This is the first study to develop and validate a German-language version of the workplace age-friendliness measure. As a reliable and valid instrument, it can be used to assess organizations' practices regarding their support for an aging workforce. Further implications and limitations of using this instrument in future empirical research are discussed.

工作场所年龄友好措施对德语的文化适应与奥地利组织的验证。
背景和目标:工作场所年龄友好度测量是一个多维的、四因素的工具,测量组织对维持老年工人就业能力的支持,是用英语和希伯来语开发的。本研究旨在对其进行文化调整,以便在使用德语的组织中使用,并在工作场所健康促进倡议的背景下验证其心理测量特性。研究设计和方法:量表的英文版本被交叉翻译成德语,并在奥地利的一个方便样本中进行试点。然后,在奥地利不同行业和地区的6个组织(主要来自卫生和教育部门)的工作场所健康促进项目中分发了这份报告,收到了1 725名员工的答复。该样本用于报告和验证量表的心理测量特性。结果:验证性因子分析证明了结构效度和测量在年龄、性别和教育等多群体社会人口变量之间的等效性。结果也支持结构的四因素解,具有可接受的内部一致性和信度。相关性表明量表与相关构念的标准(并发)效度。方差分析显示,在个体和组织特征的因素平均得分有意义的差异。讨论和启示:这是第一个开发和验证德语版本的工作场所年龄友好性测量的研究。作为一种可靠和有效的工具,它可以用来评估组织对老龄化劳动力的支持的实践。讨论了在未来实证研究中使用该工具的进一步含义和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书