Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50).

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Celalettin Cevik, Hande Vurgun, Hakan Baydur, Beyhan Eroglu
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50).","authors":"Celalettin Cevik, Hande Vurgun, Hakan Baydur, Beyhan Eroglu","doi":"10.1177/10519815261442855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOccupational safety climate, a key predictor of workplace safety performance and employee well-being, requires culturally adapted and psychometrically robust measurement tools such as the NOSACQ-50 to effectively assess safety perceptions across different industries and populations.ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of the interview-administered Turkish version of the Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50) and to assess its psychometric properties in the metal industry.MethodsA methodological study was conducted among 387 employees working in a metal industry enterprise in Balikesir BEST Transformer. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and known-groups comparisons, and discriminant validity was evaluated via correlation analyses with related scales. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 and Jamovi 2.3.28.ResultsThe Turkish version of NOSACQ-50 comprises seven subscales, with Cronbach's α coefficients ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. Person reliability values from Rasch analysis ranged between 0.81 and 0.87. CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit indices for all subscales. Significant correlations were observed between NOSACQ-50 subscales and the peer support, supervisor support, sense of community, trust, job satisfaction, and burnout subscales of the KOPSOR-TR. Furthermore, NOSACQ-50 subscales showed significant associations with the subscales of the Safety Climate Scale, supporting convergent validity.ConclusionsThe Turkish version of NOSACQ-50 demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity, and it can be used as a standardized tool for assessing occupational safety climate among employees in Turkey.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261442855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261442855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOccupational safety climate, a key predictor of workplace safety performance and employee well-being, requires culturally adapted and psychometrically robust measurement tools such as the NOSACQ-50 to effectively assess safety perceptions across different industries and populations.ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of the interview-administered Turkish version of the Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50) and to assess its psychometric properties in the metal industry.MethodsA methodological study was conducted among 387 employees working in a metal industry enterprise in Balikesir BEST Transformer. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and known-groups comparisons, and discriminant validity was evaluated via correlation analyses with related scales. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 and Jamovi 2.3.28.ResultsThe Turkish version of NOSACQ-50 comprises seven subscales, with Cronbach's α coefficients ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. Person reliability values from Rasch analysis ranged between 0.81 and 0.87. CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit indices for all subscales. Significant correlations were observed between NOSACQ-50 subscales and the peer support, supervisor support, sense of community, trust, job satisfaction, and burnout subscales of the KOPSOR-TR. Furthermore, NOSACQ-50 subscales showed significant associations with the subscales of the Safety Climate Scale, supporting convergent validity.ConclusionsThe Turkish version of NOSACQ-50 demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity, and it can be used as a standardized tool for assessing occupational safety climate among employees in Turkey.

土耳其版北欧职业安全气候问卷(NOSACQ-50)的心理测量特性。
职业安全气候是工作场所安全绩效和员工幸福感的关键预测因素,需要具有文化适应性和心理测量学上强大的测量工具,如NOSACQ-50,以有效评估不同行业和人群的安全感知。目的本研究旨在对访谈管理的土耳其版北欧职业安全气候问卷(NOSACQ-50)进行跨文化改编,并评估其在金属行业的心理测量特性。方法对巴勒克西尔百思特变压器某金属工业企业387名职工进行方法调查。采用Cronbach’s α评价内部一致性,采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和已知组比较检验构念效度,采用相关量表的相关分析评价判别效度。采用SPSS 27.0和Jamovi 2.3.28进行统计学分析。结果土耳其版NOSACQ-50量表由7个分量表组成,Cronbach’s α系数在0.85 ~ 0.92之间。Rasch分析得出的人的信度值在0.81到0.87之间。CFA证明了所有子量表的模型拟合指数都是可接受的。NOSACQ-50量表与KOPSOR-TR的同伴支持、上级支持、社区意识、信任、工作满意度和倦怠量表存在显著相关。此外,NOSACQ-50分量表与安全气候量表的分量表存在显著的相关性,支持收敛效度。结论土耳其版NOSACQ-50具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估土耳其员工职业安全气候的标准化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书