Return-to-Work self-efficacy in cancer survivors: A scoping review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sheel V Singh, Stephen Brumbach Wechsler, Deirdre Connolly, Anna Blythe, Ryley McCarron, Brenna Bigenwald, Areej El-Jawahri, Kathleen Doyle Lyons
{"title":"Return-to-Work self-efficacy in cancer survivors: A scoping review.","authors":"Sheel V Singh, Stephen Brumbach Wechsler, Deirdre Connolly, Anna Blythe, Ryley McCarron, Brenna Bigenwald, Areej El-Jawahri, Kathleen Doyle Lyons","doi":"10.1177/10519815261445913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile enhancing return-to-work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) is known to improve return-to-work (RTW) outcomes in other populations, its conceptualization, measurement, and application within cancer populations remain unclear.ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to examine the empirical literature regarding how RTW-SE has been described, measured, and addressed among cancer survivors.Methods<i>Data Sources:</i> Seven databases were searched. In total, 1208 articles were identified and screened by title and abstract. After full-text review, 29 articles were included in the final data extraction and analysis for this scoping review. <i>Data Extraction</i>: Data related to sample characteristics, study design and objectives, and psychometric properties of RTW-SE measures used were extracted from full texts. <i>Data Synthesis</i>: Descriptive statistics were used to synthesize data extracted from the articles.ResultsTen different instruments were used across the 29 articles, with the RTWSE-11 (n = 9) being the most frequently used. Articles explored the relationship between RTW-SE and various outcome variables including employment status, and expected time to RTW. Several articles also examined the extent to which RTW-SE predicted RTW, time to RTW, and work ability. Six articles tested psychosocial interventions, with half also incorporating a physical component to improve RTW-SE. None of the articles reported information about thresholds for meaningful change for RTW-SE.ConclusionsThis scoping review summarizes the current literature that describes the role of RTW-SE among cancer survivors who are in the process of returning to work. Future research is needed to determine the predictive validity and sensitivity to change of RTW-SE measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261445913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261445913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWhile enhancing return-to-work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) is known to improve return-to-work (RTW) outcomes in other populations, its conceptualization, measurement, and application within cancer populations remain unclear.ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to examine the empirical literature regarding how RTW-SE has been described, measured, and addressed among cancer survivors.MethodsData Sources: Seven databases were searched. In total, 1208 articles were identified and screened by title and abstract. After full-text review, 29 articles were included in the final data extraction and analysis for this scoping review. Data Extraction: Data related to sample characteristics, study design and objectives, and psychometric properties of RTW-SE measures used were extracted from full texts. Data Synthesis: Descriptive statistics were used to synthesize data extracted from the articles.ResultsTen different instruments were used across the 29 articles, with the RTWSE-11 (n = 9) being the most frequently used. Articles explored the relationship between RTW-SE and various outcome variables including employment status, and expected time to RTW. Several articles also examined the extent to which RTW-SE predicted RTW, time to RTW, and work ability. Six articles tested psychosocial interventions, with half also incorporating a physical component to improve RTW-SE. None of the articles reported information about thresholds for meaningful change for RTW-SE.ConclusionsThis scoping review summarizes the current literature that describes the role of RTW-SE among cancer survivors who are in the process of returning to work. Future research is needed to determine the predictive validity and sensitivity to change of RTW-SE measures.

癌症幸存者重返工作岗位的自我效能:一项范围审查。
虽然在其他人群中,提高重返工作自我效能(RTW- se)可以改善重返工作(RTW)的结果,但其概念、测量和在癌症人群中的应用仍不清楚。本综述的目的是研究关于RTW-SE如何在癌症幸存者中被描述、测量和处理的实证文献。方法资料来源:检索7个数据库。通过题目和摘要共筛选出1208篇文章。经过全文审查,29篇文章被纳入本次范围审查的最终数据提取和分析。数据提取:从全文中提取与样本特征、研究设计和目标以及RTW-SE测量方法的心理测量特性相关的数据。数据综合:采用描述性统计对文章中提取的数据进行综合。结果29篇文章使用了10种不同的仪器,其中RTWSE-11 (n = 9)是使用频率最高的。文章探讨了RTW- se与就业状况、期望RTW时间等不同结果变量的关系。一些文章还研究了RTW- se预测RTW、RTW时间和工作能力的程度。六篇文章测试了社会心理干预,其中一半还结合了身体成分来改善RTW-SE。没有一篇文章报告有关RTW-SE有意义变化的阈值的信息。本综述总结了目前描述RTW-SE在重返工作岗位的癌症幸存者中的作用的文献。RTW-SE测量的预测效度和对变化的敏感性有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书