De-risking Biopharma Asset Acquisition: Towards a Quantitative Framework for Strategic Decision-making.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xiaotang Ma, Zheng Lu, Yating Zhao, Jennifer Sheng
{"title":"De-risking Biopharma Asset Acquisition: Towards a Quantitative Framework for Strategic Decision-making.","authors":"Xiaotang Ma, Zheng Lu, Yating Zhao, Jennifer Sheng","doi":"10.1208/s12248-026-01246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impending patent cliff projected between 2028-2030 poses significant commercial and strategic challenges for innovative pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. To sustain growth and maintain competitive positioning, organizations are increasingly relying on strategic mergers, acquisitions, and partnerships to replenish pipelines. However, systematic quantitative strategies and framework for asset evaluation remain limited. This review outlines how clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics (CPP) can support asset evaluation and decision-making during the asset due diligence. First, CPP spans the entire drug development continuum, providing a quantitative framework for evaluating external assets, including pharmacological plausibility, dosing feasibility, and overall development risks. Second, Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches can be applied to predict human pharmacokinetics, inform dose selection, and estimate the probability of technical and regulatory success. Third, we examine the emerging role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in asset evaluation and portfolio decision-making, by discovering prognostic and predictive factors, and identifying the patient sub-group. We also introduce NewCo as an emerging drug-development and business model, where quantitative strategies may be deployed. Further, we address cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and sunk cost fallacies that can influence acquisition outcomes. Importantly, we propose the development of a bias-aware, fit-for-purpose corporate template to integrate CPP and MIDD insights, standardize evaluation criteria, and support cross-functional decision-making during asset due diligence. Embedding quantitative and bias-mitigated CPP frameworks into due diligence workflows, can help identify high-value opportunities, de-risk development uncertainties, and accelerate delivery of innovative therapies to patients with unmet medical needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-026-01246-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impending patent cliff projected between 2028-2030 poses significant commercial and strategic challenges for innovative pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. To sustain growth and maintain competitive positioning, organizations are increasingly relying on strategic mergers, acquisitions, and partnerships to replenish pipelines. However, systematic quantitative strategies and framework for asset evaluation remain limited. This review outlines how clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics (CPP) can support asset evaluation and decision-making during the asset due diligence. First, CPP spans the entire drug development continuum, providing a quantitative framework for evaluating external assets, including pharmacological plausibility, dosing feasibility, and overall development risks. Second, Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches can be applied to predict human pharmacokinetics, inform dose selection, and estimate the probability of technical and regulatory success. Third, we examine the emerging role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in asset evaluation and portfolio decision-making, by discovering prognostic and predictive factors, and identifying the patient sub-group. We also introduce NewCo as an emerging drug-development and business model, where quantitative strategies may be deployed. Further, we address cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and sunk cost fallacies that can influence acquisition outcomes. Importantly, we propose the development of a bias-aware, fit-for-purpose corporate template to integrate CPP and MIDD insights, standardize evaluation criteria, and support cross-functional decision-making during asset due diligence. Embedding quantitative and bias-mitigated CPP frameworks into due diligence workflows, can help identify high-value opportunities, de-risk development uncertainties, and accelerate delivery of innovative therapies to patients with unmet medical needs.

降低生物制药资产收购风险:迈向战略决策的量化框架。
预计2028-2030年之间即将到来的专利悬崖将给创新制药和生物技术公司带来重大的商业和战略挑战。为了维持增长和保持竞争地位,组织越来越依赖战略合并、收购和伙伴关系来补充管道。然而,系统的量化策略和资产评估框架仍然有限。本文概述了临床药理学和药物计量学(CPP)如何在资产尽职调查期间支持资产评估和决策。首先,CPP跨越了整个药物开发连续体,为评估外部资产提供了定量框架,包括药理学合理性、给药可行性和整体开发风险。其次,基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)方法可用于预测人体药代动力学,为剂量选择提供信息,并估计技术和监管成功的可能性。第三,我们通过发现预后和预测因素以及确定患者亚组,研究了人工智能和机器学习在资产评估和投资组合决策中的新兴作用。我们还介绍了NewCo作为一种新兴的药物开发和商业模式,可以在其中部署定量战略。此外,我们解决认知偏差,如确认偏差和沉没成本谬误,可以影响收购结果。重要的是,我们建议开发一个具有偏见意识的、符合目的的公司模板,以整合CPP和MIDD见解,标准化评估标准,并在资产尽职调查期间支持跨职能决策。在尽职调查工作流程中嵌入量化和减少偏见的CPP框架,可以帮助识别高价值机会,降低开发不确定性的风险,并加速向医疗需求未得到满足的患者提供创新疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书