Factors Associated with Respite Care Use Among Veteran Caregivers: A Machine Learning Analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Melissa Harris-Gersten, Zhen Li, Pujan Patel, Jeanie Lo, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Katherine Miller, Josephine Jacobs, Susan Nicole Hastings, Nadya Majette, Cassandra Dictus, Timothy Jobin, Courtney Van Houtven
{"title":"Factors Associated with Respite Care Use Among Veteran Caregivers: A Machine Learning Analysis.","authors":"Melissa Harris-Gersten, Zhen Li, Pujan Patel, Jeanie Lo, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Katherine Miller, Josephine Jacobs, Susan Nicole Hastings, Nadya Majette, Cassandra Dictus, Timothy Jobin, Courtney Van Houtven","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnag098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Respite care provides temporary relief to family caregivers yet remains underused, and the factors shaping its utilization among Veteran caregivers are not well understood. This evaluation examined caregiver‑ and Veteran‑specific characteristics associated with respite care use within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program's Program of General Caregiver Support Services (PGCSS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed survey and administrative data from 1,727 caregivers of Veterans enrolled in PGCSS who completed baseline surveys between 2018 and 2021. Caregivers were predominantly female (96%) with a mean age of 62 years; Veterans averaged 70 years. Respite use within two years of survey completion was identified through linked VA data. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model, 34 caregiver and Veteran variables were evaluated with random forest models to identify characteristics that most strongly differentiated respite users from non‑users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respite care was used by 23.5% of caregivers. Use was more common among older caregivers and Veterans (predisposing factors), among caregivers reporting greater burden, depression, or financial strain and Veterans with higher frailty, functional limitation, or dementia (need factors), and among caregivers perceiving stronger communication and collaboration with the clinical team (enabling factors). Model performance was strong (testing accuracy = 0.79 with all variables; 0.77 with the top 15), and results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to caregivers of Veterans who survived the two‑year follow‑up period.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Both caregiving intensity and care‑recipient complexity characterize respite use even within a system of broad service availability. Findings provide a foundation for future hypothesis‑driven studies and inform efforts to align respite programs more closely with caregiver-Veteran needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Respite care provides temporary relief to family caregivers yet remains underused, and the factors shaping its utilization among Veteran caregivers are not well understood. This evaluation examined caregiver‑ and Veteran‑specific characteristics associated with respite care use within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program's Program of General Caregiver Support Services (PGCSS).

Research design and methods: We analyzed survey and administrative data from 1,727 caregivers of Veterans enrolled in PGCSS who completed baseline surveys between 2018 and 2021. Caregivers were predominantly female (96%) with a mean age of 62 years; Veterans averaged 70 years. Respite use within two years of survey completion was identified through linked VA data. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model, 34 caregiver and Veteran variables were evaluated with random forest models to identify characteristics that most strongly differentiated respite users from non‑users.

Results: Respite care was used by 23.5% of caregivers. Use was more common among older caregivers and Veterans (predisposing factors), among caregivers reporting greater burden, depression, or financial strain and Veterans with higher frailty, functional limitation, or dementia (need factors), and among caregivers perceiving stronger communication and collaboration with the clinical team (enabling factors). Model performance was strong (testing accuracy = 0.79 with all variables; 0.77 with the top 15), and results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to caregivers of Veterans who survived the two‑year follow‑up period.

Discussion and implications: Both caregiving intensity and care‑recipient complexity characterize respite use even within a system of broad service availability. Findings provide a foundation for future hypothesis‑driven studies and inform efforts to align respite programs more closely with caregiver-Veteran needs.

与退伍军人护理人员使用临时护理相关的因素:机器学习分析。
背景和目的:暂息护理为家庭护理人员提供了暂时的救济,但仍未得到充分利用,而影响退伍军人护理人员使用暂息护理的因素尚不清楚。该评估检查了退伍军人事务部(VA)护理人员支持计划的一般护理人员支持服务计划(PGCSS)中与临时护理使用相关的护理人员和退伍军人特定特征。研究设计和方法:我们分析了 1,727名 参加PGCSS的退伍军人护理人员的调查和管理数据,他们在 2018 和 2021之间完成了基线调查。照顾者主要为女性 (96%),平均 年龄 为 62 岁;70年退伍军人平均  年。通过关联的VA数据确定了在2 年内完成调查的喘息使用情况。在安徒生医疗保健利用模型的指导下,使用随机森林模型评估了34个 护理人员和退伍军人变量,以确定最明显区分喘息使用者和非使用者的特征。结果: 23.5% 的护理人员采用暂息护理。老年护理人员和退伍军人(诱发因素)、负担更重、抑郁或经济压力更大的护理人员和体弱多病、功能受限或痴呆更严重的退伍军人(需要因素)以及与临床团队沟通和协作更强的护理人员(使能因素)中使用更为常见。模型的性能很好(所有变量的测试精度 = 0.79 ; 顶部的测试精度 0.77  15),并且在仅限于存活两年随访期的退伍军人护理人员的敏感性分析中结果保持一致。讨论和影响:即使在广泛提供服务的系统中,护理强度和护理对象的复杂性都是喘息使用的特征。研究结果为未来的假设驱动研究提供了基础,并为使喘息计划更紧密地与护理人员-退伍军人的需求相结合提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书