Melissa Harris-Gersten, Zhen Li, Pujan Patel, Jeanie Lo, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Katherine Miller, Josephine Jacobs, Susan Nicole Hastings, Nadya Majette, Cassandra Dictus, Timothy Jobin, Courtney Van Houtven
{"title":"Factors Associated with Respite Care Use Among Veteran Caregivers: A Machine Learning Analysis.","authors":"Melissa Harris-Gersten, Zhen Li, Pujan Patel, Jeanie Lo, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Katherine Miller, Josephine Jacobs, Susan Nicole Hastings, Nadya Majette, Cassandra Dictus, Timothy Jobin, Courtney Van Houtven","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnag098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Respite care provides temporary relief to family caregivers yet remains underused, and the factors shaping its utilization among Veteran caregivers are not well understood. This evaluation examined caregiver‑ and Veteran‑specific characteristics associated with respite care use within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program's Program of General Caregiver Support Services (PGCSS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed survey and administrative data from 1,727 caregivers of Veterans enrolled in PGCSS who completed baseline surveys between 2018 and 2021. Caregivers were predominantly female (96%) with a mean age of 62 years; Veterans averaged 70 years. Respite use within two years of survey completion was identified through linked VA data. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model, 34 caregiver and Veteran variables were evaluated with random forest models to identify characteristics that most strongly differentiated respite users from non‑users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respite care was used by 23.5% of caregivers. Use was more common among older caregivers and Veterans (predisposing factors), among caregivers reporting greater burden, depression, or financial strain and Veterans with higher frailty, functional limitation, or dementia (need factors), and among caregivers perceiving stronger communication and collaboration with the clinical team (enabling factors). Model performance was strong (testing accuracy = 0.79 with all variables; 0.77 with the top 15), and results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to caregivers of Veterans who survived the two‑year follow‑up period.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Both caregiving intensity and care‑recipient complexity characterize respite use even within a system of broad service availability. Findings provide a foundation for future hypothesis‑driven studies and inform efforts to align respite programs more closely with caregiver-Veteran needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Respite care provides temporary relief to family caregivers yet remains underused, and the factors shaping its utilization among Veteran caregivers are not well understood. This evaluation examined caregiver‑ and Veteran‑specific characteristics associated with respite care use within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program's Program of General Caregiver Support Services (PGCSS).
Research design and methods: We analyzed survey and administrative data from 1,727 caregivers of Veterans enrolled in PGCSS who completed baseline surveys between 2018 and 2021. Caregivers were predominantly female (96%) with a mean age of 62 years; Veterans averaged 70 years. Respite use within two years of survey completion was identified through linked VA data. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model, 34 caregiver and Veteran variables were evaluated with random forest models to identify characteristics that most strongly differentiated respite users from non‑users.
Results: Respite care was used by 23.5% of caregivers. Use was more common among older caregivers and Veterans (predisposing factors), among caregivers reporting greater burden, depression, or financial strain and Veterans with higher frailty, functional limitation, or dementia (need factors), and among caregivers perceiving stronger communication and collaboration with the clinical team (enabling factors). Model performance was strong (testing accuracy = 0.79 with all variables; 0.77 with the top 15), and results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to caregivers of Veterans who survived the two‑year follow‑up period.
Discussion and implications: Both caregiving intensity and care‑recipient complexity characterize respite use even within a system of broad service availability. Findings provide a foundation for future hypothesis‑driven studies and inform efforts to align respite programs more closely with caregiver-Veteran needs.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.