Opioid-free anaesthesia with loco-regional block enhances safety and recovery in patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Aparna Sinha, Dinesh Punhani, Abhishek Sharma, Sangeetha Patro, Neha Gupta, Misha Katyal
{"title":"Opioid-free anaesthesia with loco-regional block enhances safety and recovery in patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Aparna Sinha, Dinesh Punhani, Abhishek Sharma, Sangeetha Patro, Neha Gupta, Misha Katyal","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_35_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA), when incorporated into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, may improve peri-operative safety and recovery in patients with obesity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a multimodal OFA regimen incorporating loco-regional anaesthesia in this population undergoing general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective randomised study with participant and outcome-assessor blinding, 380 adults (body mass index >35 kg/m 2 ) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to receive OFA or non-OFA (N-OFA). The OFA group received dexmedetomidine (0.3-0.5 μg/kg/h), low-dose ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) and an ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The N-OFA group received fentanyl (1-2 μg/kg ideal body weight). All patients received total intravenous anaesthesia. The primary outcome was time to discharge readiness (DR). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid requirement, quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) and airway-related adverse events (ARAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable, and pain scores were significantly lower in the OFA group at 3 and 24 h ( P < 0.001). At 24 h, 61.1% of patients in the OFA group reported no pain compared with 42.6% in the N-OFA group. Rescue opioid requirement was markedly reduced (2.1% vs. 95.5%, P < 0.001). Time to DR was shorter (9.7 ± 1.6 h vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 h, P < 0.001), and QoR-40 scores were higher in the OFA group. ARAEs were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OFA using loco-regional block, dexmedetomidine and ketamine improves recovery, reduces opioid use and accelerates DR in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_35_26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA), when incorporated into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, may improve peri-operative safety and recovery in patients with obesity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a multimodal OFA regimen incorporating loco-regional anaesthesia in this population undergoing general anaesthesia.

Patients and methods: In this prospective randomised study with participant and outcome-assessor blinding, 380 adults (body mass index >35 kg/m 2 ) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to receive OFA or non-OFA (N-OFA). The OFA group received dexmedetomidine (0.3-0.5 μg/kg/h), low-dose ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) and an ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The N-OFA group received fentanyl (1-2 μg/kg ideal body weight). All patients received total intravenous anaesthesia. The primary outcome was time to discharge readiness (DR). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid requirement, quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) and airway-related adverse events (ARAEs).

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, and pain scores were significantly lower in the OFA group at 3 and 24 h ( P < 0.001). At 24 h, 61.1% of patients in the OFA group reported no pain compared with 42.6% in the N-OFA group. Rescue opioid requirement was markedly reduced (2.1% vs. 95.5%, P < 0.001). Time to DR was shorter (9.7 ± 1.6 h vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 h, P < 0.001), and QoR-40 scores were higher in the OFA group. ARAEs were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: OFA using loco-regional block, dexmedetomidine and ketamine improves recovery, reduces opioid use and accelerates DR in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

一项随机对照试验:局部-区域阻滞的无阿片类麻醉增强了接受非减肥手术的肥胖患者的安全性和恢复。
无阿片类麻醉(OFA),当纳入术后增强恢复(ERAS)途径时,可以提高肥胖患者围手术期的安全性和恢复。我们评估了多模式OFA方案结合局部-区域麻醉在接受全身麻醉的人群中的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:在这项前瞻性随机研究中,采用参与者和结果评估者盲法,380名接受选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成年人(体重指数bb0 ~ 35 kg/ m2)被随机分为OFA组和非OFA组(N-OFA)。OFA组给予右美托咪定(0.3 ~ 0.5 μg/kg/h)、低剂量氯胺酮(0.2 mg/kg)及超声引导下肋下经腹平面阻滞30 ml 0.25%布比卡因。N-OFA组给予芬太尼(1 ~ 2 μg/kg理想体重)。所有患者均接受全静脉麻醉。主要观察指标为出院准备时间(DR)。次要结局包括疼痛评分、阿片类药物需求、恢复质量-40 (QoR-40)和气道相关不良事件(arae)。结果:基线特征具有可比性,OFA组疼痛评分在3和24 h时显著降低(P < 0.001)。24小时时,OFA组61.1%的患者报告无疼痛,而N-OFA组为42.6%。救援阿片类药物需求显著降低(2.1% vs. 95.5%, P < 0.001)。OFA组发生DR的时间较短(9.7±1.6 h比11.6±2.7 h, P < 0.001), QoR-40评分较高。arae无统计学意义。结论:应用局部-区域阻滞、右美托咪定和氯胺酮的OFA可改善腹腔镜手术肥胖患者的恢复,减少阿片类药物的使用,加速DR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书