Moral Injury as a Wound of Meaning and Conscience: An Introductory Synthesis of Conceptual Foundations, Spiritual Dimensions, and Clinical Implications.

IF 2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tugba Yilmaz, Yusuf Ziya Koç, Eda Şen, Rüşen Sinecem
{"title":"Moral Injury as a Wound of Meaning and Conscience: An Introductory Synthesis of Conceptual Foundations, Spiritual Dimensions, and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Tugba Yilmaz, Yusuf Ziya Koç, Eda Şen, Rüşen Sinecem","doi":"10.1007/s10943-026-02674-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral injury (MI) refers to moral, relational, and existential suffering that may follow exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs), including violence, betrayal, systemic injustice, or interpersonal abuse. Although initially conceptualized within military contexts, moral injury has increasingly been documented across civilian, occupational, and clinical populations such as healthcare professionals, first responders, and humanitarian workers. Despite rapid growth in the literature, the construct remains theoretically fragmented and diagnostically undefined, complicating assessment and intervention. This narrative review synthesizes conceptual, empirical, and methodological literature on moral injury with particular attention to its psychological, moral, and existential dimensions. The literature suggests that moral injury is best understood as a multidimensional form of trauma-related harm characterized by moral emotions such as guilt, shame, anger, and betrayal, alongside disruptions in meaning-making, relational trust, and moral identity. These experiences may also involve existential and spiritual struggles related to conscience, responsibility, forgiveness, and reconciliation. Measurement approaches have increasingly shifted toward multidimensional outcome measures that distinguish exposure to morally injurious events from the emotional and existential consequences that follow. Emerging clinical interventions emphasize meaning-oriented, compassion-based, and moral repair processes aimed at restoring moral identity, relational trust, and a sense of purpose. Overall, moral injury represents a distinct but overlapping construct within the broader trauma spectrum that cannot be adequately captured by fear-based models alone. Future progress requires conceptually aligned measurement strategies and integrative clinical approaches that address moral, relational, and existential suffering while recognizing the role of meaning-making and spiritually informed healing processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-026-02674-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral injury (MI) refers to moral, relational, and existential suffering that may follow exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs), including violence, betrayal, systemic injustice, or interpersonal abuse. Although initially conceptualized within military contexts, moral injury has increasingly been documented across civilian, occupational, and clinical populations such as healthcare professionals, first responders, and humanitarian workers. Despite rapid growth in the literature, the construct remains theoretically fragmented and diagnostically undefined, complicating assessment and intervention. This narrative review synthesizes conceptual, empirical, and methodological literature on moral injury with particular attention to its psychological, moral, and existential dimensions. The literature suggests that moral injury is best understood as a multidimensional form of trauma-related harm characterized by moral emotions such as guilt, shame, anger, and betrayal, alongside disruptions in meaning-making, relational trust, and moral identity. These experiences may also involve existential and spiritual struggles related to conscience, responsibility, forgiveness, and reconciliation. Measurement approaches have increasingly shifted toward multidimensional outcome measures that distinguish exposure to morally injurious events from the emotional and existential consequences that follow. Emerging clinical interventions emphasize meaning-oriented, compassion-based, and moral repair processes aimed at restoring moral identity, relational trust, and a sense of purpose. Overall, moral injury represents a distinct but overlapping construct within the broader trauma spectrum that cannot be adequately captured by fear-based models alone. Future progress requires conceptually aligned measurement strategies and integrative clinical approaches that address moral, relational, and existential suffering while recognizing the role of meaning-making and spiritually informed healing processes.

作为意义和良心伤口的道德伤害:概念基础、精神维度和临床含义的介绍性综合。
道德伤害(MI)是指暴露于潜在的道德伤害事件(pmii)后可能产生的道德、关系和存在的痛苦,包括暴力、背叛、系统性不公正或人际虐待。尽管最初的概念是在军事背景下提出的,但道德伤害已经越来越多地在平民、职业和临床人群(如医疗保健专业人员、急救人员和人道主义工作者)中得到记录。尽管文献快速增长,该结构在理论上仍然是碎片化的,诊断上不明确,使评估和干预复杂化。这篇叙事性评论综合了关于道德伤害的概念、经验和方法论文献,特别关注其心理、道德和存在维度。文献表明,道德伤害最好被理解为一种多维形式的创伤相关伤害,其特征是道德情感,如内疚、羞耻、愤怒和背叛,以及意义创造、关系信任和道德认同的中断。这些经历也可能涉及与良心、责任、宽恕和和解有关的存在主义和精神斗争。测量方法越来越多地转向多维结果测量,以区分暴露于道德伤害事件与随之而来的情感和存在后果。新兴的临床干预强调以意义为导向,以同情为基础,以及旨在恢复道德认同,关系信任和目的感的道德修复过程。总的来说,在更广泛的创伤谱系中,道德伤害代表了一种独特但重叠的结构,仅凭基于恐惧的模型无法充分捕捉。未来的进展需要概念上一致的测量策略和综合临床方法,以解决道德、关系和存在的痛苦,同时认识到意义创造和精神上知情的治疗过程的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书