Reducing Time Off Work Through an Integrated Care Pathway for Shoulder Injuries: Evidence from a Workers' Compensation Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Anelise Silveira, Lauren A Beaupre, Donald Voaklander, Riikka Niemelainen, C Allyson Jones
{"title":"Reducing Time Off Work Through an Integrated Care Pathway for Shoulder Injuries: Evidence from a Workers' Compensation Cohort Study.","authors":"Anelise Silveira, Lauren A Beaupre, Donald Voaklander, Riikka Niemelainen, C Allyson Jones","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10409-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of implementing a care pathway on return-to-work (RTW) levels and identify prognostic factors among workers filing their first shoulder injury claim.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 5075 workers with a first claim for shoulder injury: 2593 workers (2004-2008) received standard of care consultations, while 2482 workers (2014-2018) underwent specialized shoulder assessments through a care pathway that also included collaborative planning for RTW. Multinomial logistic regression determined the effect of implementing a care pathway on RTW levels and identified demographics, injury, occupational and program factors associated with RTW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common injuries were traumatic (92.4%) and sprains/strains (64%). Median claim duration was 114 days (IQR = 140), with 80.6% receiving wage replacement benefits. The care pathway cohort was younger with shorter claim duration than the pre-care pathway cohort. They had 1.8 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4; 2.3) greater risk of returning to modified duties than the pre-care pathway cohort. Days receiving wage replacement benefits 12-month post-claim closure were similar between cohorts (p = 0.8). RTW outcomes were impacted by demographics, injury, occupational, and program factors, with interpreter use, prolonged claims, poor compliance, and delayed treatment most strongly associated with failure to RTW at pre-accident levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate that the care pathway cohort was associated with quicker return to modified duties without compromising long-term RTW outcome. This underscores the importance of proactive intervention strategies like care pathways in optimizing workplace rehabilitation outcomes and minimizing long-term disability. Clinical Trial Number Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10409-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of implementing a care pathway on return-to-work (RTW) levels and identify prognostic factors among workers filing their first shoulder injury claim.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 5075 workers with a first claim for shoulder injury: 2593 workers (2004-2008) received standard of care consultations, while 2482 workers (2014-2018) underwent specialized shoulder assessments through a care pathway that also included collaborative planning for RTW. Multinomial logistic regression determined the effect of implementing a care pathway on RTW levels and identified demographics, injury, occupational and program factors associated with RTW.

Results: The most common injuries were traumatic (92.4%) and sprains/strains (64%). Median claim duration was 114 days (IQR = 140), with 80.6% receiving wage replacement benefits. The care pathway cohort was younger with shorter claim duration than the pre-care pathway cohort. They had 1.8 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4; 2.3) greater risk of returning to modified duties than the pre-care pathway cohort. Days receiving wage replacement benefits 12-month post-claim closure were similar between cohorts (p = 0.8). RTW outcomes were impacted by demographics, injury, occupational, and program factors, with interpreter use, prolonged claims, poor compliance, and delayed treatment most strongly associated with failure to RTW at pre-accident levels.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that the care pathway cohort was associated with quicker return to modified duties without compromising long-term RTW outcome. This underscores the importance of proactive intervention strategies like care pathways in optimizing workplace rehabilitation outcomes and minimizing long-term disability. Clinical Trial Number Not applicable.

通过肩部损伤的综合护理途径减少休假时间:来自工人赔偿队列研究的证据。
目的:确定实施护理途径对重返工作(RTW)水平的影响,并确定工人首次提交肩伤索赔的预后因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括5075名首次索赔肩伤的工人:2593名工人(2004-2008年)接受了标准护理咨询,而2482名工人(2014-2018年)通过护理途径接受了专门的肩部评估,其中包括RTW的协同规划。多项逻辑回归确定了实施护理途径对RTW水平的影响,并确定了与RTW相关的人口统计学、伤害、职业和项目因素。结果:最常见的损伤是外伤性损伤(92.4%)和扭伤/拉伤(64%)。申领时间中位数为114天(IQR = 140), 80.6%的人领取工资替代福利。护理途径队列比护理前途径队列更年轻,索赔时间更短。95%置信区间(CI) 1.4;2.3)与护理前路径队列相比,返回修改职责的风险更高。索赔结束后12个月领取工资替代福利的天数在队列之间相似(p = 0.8)。RTW结果受人口统计学、伤害、职业和项目因素的影响,其中口译员的使用、索赔时间延长、依从性差和延迟治疗与事故前RTW失败最密切相关。结论:研究结果表明,护理途径队列与在不影响长期RTW结果的情况下更快地返回修改后的职责相关。这强调了主动干预策略(如护理路径)在优化工作场所康复结果和最大限度地减少长期残疾方面的重要性。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书